Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences

Table 1 Transition probabilities for the transitions 1s² np–1s² 2s calculated in this work compared with other results

From: Rydberg energies and transition probabilities of Li I for np–ms (m ≤ 5) transitions

Configuration		Energy	Transition probabilities
Upper level	Lower level	cm⁻¹	This work	Other results
1s² 2p	1s² 2s	14,903.66	3.64E+07	3.66E+07^a,3.69E+7^b, 3.79E+07^c, 3.86E+07^d, 3.67E+07^e, 3.27E+07^f, 3.67E+07^g
1s² 3p	1s² 2s	30,925.38	1.00E+06	8.98E+05^a, 1.00E+06^b, 1.20E+06^c, 1.00E+06^d,5.98E+05^e, 1.7E+06^f, 1.09E+06^g
1s² 4p	1s² 2s	36,469.55	1.27E+06	1.17E+06^a, 1.25E+06^b, 8.48E+05^c, 1.69E+06^f, 1.4E+06^g
1s² 5p	1s² 2s	39,015.56	8.72E+05	8.04E+05,9.00E+05, 5.85E+05
1s² 6p	1s² 2s	40,390.84	5.77E+05	5.31E+05^a, 5.73E+05^b, 3.86E+05^e, 3.32E+06^g
1s² 7p	1s² 2s	41,217.05	3.91E+05	3.59E+05^a, 3.82E+05^b
1s² 8p	1s² 2s	41,751.86	2.74E+05	2.59E+05^a, 2.66E+05^b
1s² 9p	1s² 2s	42,117.78	1.98E+05	1.80E+05^a, 1.917E+5^b
1s² 10p	1s² 2s	42,379.09	1.48E+05	1.38E+05^a, 2.09E+5^b
1s² 11p	1s² 2s	42,572.16	1.12E+05	1.42E+05^a, 1.65E+05^b
1s² 12p	1s² 2s	42,718.85	8.75E+04	7.93E+04^a, 1.34E+05^b
1s² 13p	1s² 2s	42,832.9	6.94E+04	1.09E+05^b
1s² 14p	1s² 2s	42,923.31	5.59E+04
1s² 15p	1s² 2s	42,996.21	4.57E+04
1s² 16p	1s² 2s	43,055.82	3.78E+04
1s² 17p	1s² 2s	43,105.21	1.09E+04
1s² 18p	1s² 2s	43,146.57	2.67E+04
1s² 19p	1s² 2s	43,181.56	2.27E+04
1s² 20p	1s² 2s	43,211.42	1.95E+04
1s² 21p	1s² 2s	43,237.11	1.69E+04
1s² 22p	1s² 2s	43,259.37	1.47E+04
1s² 23p	1s² 2s	43,278.78	1.29E+04
1s² 24p	1s² 2s	43,295.82	1.14E+04
1s² 25p	1s² 2s	43,310.84	1.01E+04
1s² 26p	1s² 2s	43,324.17	8.95E+03
1s² 27p	1s² 2s	43,336.03	8.00E+03
1s² 28p	1s² 2s	43,346.65	7.18E+03
1s² 29p	1s² 2s	43,356.19	6.46E+03
1s² 30p	1s² 2s	43,364.78	5.84E+03

^aLingard [8], ^bNIST [5], ^c,dCelik [12], ^eZheng [11], ^fHeavens[6], ^gKostelecky[9]

Back to article page