Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences

Table 5 Comparison solution by MDTM, FDM, and shooting method with Nu and HPM [35] for V (η) when \(\varphi\) = 0.07, δ = 2, P = 0, Ha = 0, \(\frac{1}{{R_{d} }}\) = 0, Ec = 2, Pr = 6.2, and \(\alpha\) = 0

From: Radiative MHD flow of Rivlin–Ericksen nanofluid of grade three through porous medium with uniform heat source

η	Present v (η)			v (η) [35]
η	MDTM	FDM	Shooting method	Nu	HPM
− 1	0	0	0.000017360000000	0.000000	2.00e−11
− 0.8	0.0263871069970389	0.026756648117180	0.028131952780800	2.64e−02	0.026707
− 0.6	0.0377968202181078	0.038456991519952	0.039791286425600	0.037801	0.038229
− 0.4	0.0366455592452191	0.037449540554391	0.038657135014400	0.036652	0.037135
− 0.2	0.0266332183474780	0.027461728992522	0.028476807859200	0.026641	0.027227
0	0.0116755798181022	0.012471144615492	0.013091000000000	0.011684	0.012360
0.2	− 0.0044314126089784	− 0.003695940273408	− 0.00355835729920	− 4.42e−03	− 3.73e−03
0.4	− 0.0178316240970406	− 0.017207382328530	− 0.01742024605440	− 1.78e−02	− 1.72e−02
0.6	− 0.0243573107682773	− 0.023940881135197	− 0.02432671106560	− 2.44e−02	− 2.37e−02
0.8	0.0196282178526106	− 0.019476674321430	− 0.01998500942080	− 1.96e−02	− 1.90e−02
1	3.524349637965*^-7	0	0.000030240000000	0.000000	0.000000

Back to article page