Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences

Table 7 Comparison solution by MDTM, FDM, and shooting method with Nu and HPM [35] for θ (η) when \(\varphi\) = 0.07, δ = 2, P = 0, Ha = 0, \(\frac{1}{{R_{d} }}\) = 0, Ec = 2, Pr = 6.2, and \(\alpha\) = 0

From: Radiative MHD flow of Rivlin–Ericksen nanofluid of grade three through porous medium with uniform heat source

η	Present θ (η)			θ (η) [35]
η	MDTM	FDM	Shooting method	Nu	HPM
− 1	0.500000000000000	0.500000000000000	0.501532200000000	5.00e−01	0.500000
− 0.8	0.4122424546865951	0.411231537502520	0.412400824640000	0.412251	0.410966
− 0.6	0.3184236211524941	0.319967177782257	0.320214567360000	0.318437	0.317645
− 0.4	0.2238523181397247	0.226206920839213	0.226089794880000	0.223868	0.223923
− 0.2	0.1285597853705173	0.129950766673386	0.130139604800000	0.128579	0.129006
0	0.0307284125447637	0.031198715284777	0.031893000000000	0.030749	0.030992
0.2	− 0.0709204281187916	− 0.070049233326614	− 0.06928593696000	− 7.09e−02	− 7.10e−02
0.4	− 0.1760391250819469	− 0.173793079160787	− 0.17377886944000	− 0.176022	− 0.176076
0.6	− 0.282882693412802	− 0.280032822217743	− 0.28129403232000	− 0.282871	− 0.282354
0.8	− 0.3900682662257274	− 0.388768462497480	− 0.39044705760000	− 0.390062	− 0.389033
1	− 0.4999999247040331	− 0.500000000000000	− 0.49834180000000	− 0.500000	− 0.500000

Back to article page