Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences

Table 4 Comparison solution by MDTM, FDM, and shooting method with Nu and HPM [35] for V (η) when \(\varphi\) = 0.01, δ = 1, P = 0, Ha = 0, \(\frac{1}{{R_{d} }}\) = 0, Ec = 1, Pr = 6.2, and \(\alpha\) = 0

From: Radiative MHD flow of Rivlin–Ericksen nanofluid of grade three through porous medium with uniform heat source

η	Present v (η)			v (η) [35]
η	MDTM	FDM	Shooting method	Nu	HPM
− 1	0	0	0.000008625000000	0	− 1.00e−12
− 0.8	0.0248889137406262	0.025100805859412	0.025678351456000	2.49e-02	0.024978
− 0.6	0.0343610151313935	0.034694542987441	0.035179982872000	0.034361	0.034499
− 0.4	0.0315996426708186	0.031972343649594	0.032362783968000	0.0316000	0.031771
− 0.2	0.0205042979192536	0.020866193989263	0.021116768584000	0.020505	0.020717
0	0.0050363939659476	0.005367924421495	0.005374300000000	0.005037	0.005283
0.2	− 0.0109298916536909	− 0.010638770093157	− 0.01088830874400	− 1.09e−02	− 1.07e−02
0.4	− 0.0234796480160966	− 0.023252896625209	− 0.02364919452800	− 2.35e−02	− 2.32e−02
0.6	− 0.0285202216294248	− 0.028395751318524	− 0.02883934383200	− 2.85e−02	− 2.83e−02
0.8	− 0.0218952703866748	− 0.021876616709771	− 0.02234099241600	− 2.19e−02	− 2.17e−02
1	1.27761*10^-7	0	0.000013975000000	0	1.00e−12

Back to article page