Skip to main content

Table 6 Comparison solution by MDTM, FDM, and shooting method with Nu and HPM [35] for θ (η) when \({ }\varphi\) = 0.01, δ = 1, P = 0, Ha = 0, \(\frac{1}{{R_{d} }}\) = 0, Ec = 1, Pr = 6.2, and \(\alpha\) = 0

From: Radiative MHD flow of Rivlin–Ericksen nanofluid of grade three through porous medium with uniform heat source

η

Present θ (η)

θ (η) [35]

MDTM

FDM

Shooting method

Nu

HPM

 − 1

0.500000000000000

0.500000000000000

0.500612300000000

0.5

0.5

 − 0.8

0.4048517213003998

0.404741915710620

0.404681040960000

0.404852

0.404687

 − 0.6

0.3075705040841343

0.308430072374435

0.308052719840000

0.307571

0.307541

 − 0.4

0.2100694862476117

0.211064469991446

0.210698745920000

0.210070

0.210225

 − 0.2

0.1121566516441399

0.112645108561653

0.112462917600000

0.112157

0.112397

0

0.0130337276413045

0.013171988085055

0.013145000000000

0.013034

0.013246

0.2

 − 0.0877464857138474

 − 0.087354891438347

 − 0.08741569744000

 − 8.77e−02

 − 8.76e−02

0.4

 − 0.1899083279925779

 − 0.188935530008554

 − 0.18925674336000

 − 0.189907

 − 0.189774

0.6

 − 0.2926661222188964

 − 0.291569927625565

 − 0.29220900688000

 − 0.292665

 − 0.292458

0.8

 − 0.3955710872738615

 − 0.395258084289380

 − 0.39581308000000

 − 0.395570

 − 0.395312

1

 − 0.5000000187397369

 − 0.500000000000000

 − 0.49923570000000

 − 0.5

 − 0.5