Skip to main content

Table 12 The comparison of present, existing, and exact solutions with \(\sigma\) = 0.5, \(\alpha\) = 0.5, \(M\) = 120, and \(\hat{\nu }\) = 1 at \(t\) = 1 for Example 3

From: A hybrid B-spline collocation technique for the Caputo time fractional nonlinear Burgers’ equation

 

Present

QBSG [19]

Present

QBSG [19]

Present

QBSG [19]

Present

QBSG

[19]

Exact

\(\boldsymbol{x}\)

\(\boldsymbol{\Delta t}\) = 0.0025

\(\boldsymbol{\Delta t}\) = 0.002

\(\boldsymbol{\Delta t}\) = 0.001

\(\boldsymbol{\Delta t}\) = 0.0005

 

0.0

0.000000

0.000000

0.000000

0.000000

0.000000

0.000000

0.000000

0.000000

0.000000

0.1

0.587705

0.588970

0.587708

0.588675

0.587719

0.588083

0.587729

0.587788

0.587785

0.2

0.950923

0.952952

0.950927

0.952484

0.950945

0.951545

0.950963

0.951076

0.951057

0.3

0.950916

0.952914

0.950922

0.952458

0.950940

0.951544

0.950959

0.951086

0.951057

0.4

0.587695

0.588914

0.587698

0.588635

0.587711

0.588087

0.587723

0.587810

0.587785

0.5

0.000000

0.000005

0.000000

0.000005

0.000000

0.000005

0.000000

0.000004

0.000000

0.6

 − 0.587695

 − 0.588905

 − 0.587698

 − 0.588630

 − 0.587711

 − 0.588077

 − 0.587723

 − 0.587801

 − 0.587785

0.7

 − 0.950916

 − 0.952912

 − 0.950922

 − 0.952456

 − 0.950940

 − 0.951540

 − 0.950959

 − 0.951084

 − 0.951057

0.8

 − 0.950923

 − 0.952949

 − 0.950927

 − 0.952479

 − 0.950945

 − 0.951540

 − 0.950963

 − 0.951070

 − 0.951057

0.9

 − 0.587705

 − 0.588968

− 0.587708

 − 0.588672

 − 0.587719

 − 0.588080

 − 0.587729

 − 0.587784

 − 0.587785

1.0

0.000000

0.000000

− 0.587708

0.000000

0.000000

0.000000

0.000000

0.000000

0.000000

\(L_{2}\)

1.0200e−04

1.39237e−03

9.7988e−05

1.04859e−03

8.4639e−05

3.5948e−04

7.0823e−05

1.7823e−05

 

\(L_{\infty }\)

1.4438e−04

1.97435e−03

1.3870e−04

1.48780e−03

1.1979e−04

5.1210e−04

1.0022e−04

3.2161e−05