Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline and pre-operative data of the studied patients (N = 101):

From: Ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus conventional c-arm-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective randomized comparative study

 

Studied groups

P value

 

US-PCNL N = 51

FL-PCNL N = 50

 

Sex; N (%)

   

 Female

25 (49.0%)

19 (38.0%)

0.180

 Male

26 (51.0%)

31 (62.0%)

 

Age; (years)

   

 Mean ± SD

37.39 ± 12.52

39.86 ± 14.22

0.357

 Range

19.00–65.00

18.00–78.00

 

Side; N (%)

   

 Rt

25 (49.0%)

25 (50.0%)

0.541

 Lt

26 (51.0%)

25 (50.0%)

 

Previous renal stone surgery; N (%)

   

 No

46 (90.2%)

39 (78.0%)

0.079

 Yes

5 (9.8%)

11 (22.0%)

 

Hydronephrosis grade; N (%)

   

 None

7 (13.7%)

10 (20.0%)

0.598

 Mild

29 (56.9%)

23 (46.0%)

 

 Moderate

13 (25.5%)

13 (26.0%)

 

 Severe

2 (3.9%)

4 (8.0%)

 

Stone site; N (%)

   

 Single

16 (31.4%)

15 (30.0%)

0.257

 Multiple

32 (62.7%)

27 (54.0%)

 

 Stag horn

3 (5.9%)

8 (16.0%)

 

Guy’s score; N (%)

   

 1

30 (58.9%)

24 (48.0%)

0.154

 2

18 (35.2%)

15 (30.0%)

 

 3

0 (0.0%)

3 (6.0%)

 

 4

3 (5.9%)

8 (16.0%)

 

Stone type; N (%)

   

 Radio-lucent

9 (17.6%)

5 (10.0%)

0.206

 Radio-opaque

42 (82.4%)

45 (90.0%)

 

Stone size

   

 Mean ± SD

3.11 ± 0.06

3.35 ± 1.27

0.221

 Range

2.00–5.00

1.20–7.00

 

Stone density

   

 Mean ± SD

1266.06 ± 289.15

1289.64 ± 276.84

0.676

 Range

636.00–1780.00

680.00–1814.00

 

Haemoglobin; g/dL

   

 Mean ± SD

13.09 ± 1.29

12.73 ± 1.19

0.154

 Range

11.00–16.00

10.5–16.00