Skip to main content

Table 7 Comparison of Van der Pol–Duffing oscillator response obtained by different techniques and their relative errors compared to RK4. \(\varepsilon = - \mu = 0.2, F = 0.53\), \(\omega = 1\), \(y\left( {t_{0} } \right) = 0.1\) and \(\dot{y}\left( {t_{0} } \right) = - 0.2\)

From: Novel approach for solving higher-order differential equations with applications to the Van der Pol and Van der Pol–Duffing equations

t

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Present

0.100

0.786

0.751

− 1.035

− 0.553

− 0.072

− 1.426

0.334

0.786

ode15s

0.100

0.784

0.755

− 1.018

− 0.575

− 0.195

− 1.465

1.140

− 0.342

ode45

0.100

0.786

0.758

− 1.007

− 0.593

− 0.283

− 1.386

1.566

− 0.952

RK4

0.100

0.786

0.751

− 1.030

− 0.562

− 0.126

− 1.475

0.716

0.240

erropres

0

0

0

1

1

42

3

53

227

errode15s

0

0

0

1

2

55

1

59

242

errode45

0

0

1

2

6

125

6

119

496

t

18

20

22

24

26

28

30

32

34

Present

− 1.628

2.068

− 2.195

1.809

− 0.415

− 1.053

− 0.309

− 0.596

− 1.140

ode15s

− 0.126

0.510

− 1.142

1.792

0.071

− 1.353

− 0.483

1.863

− 0.831

ode45

0.479

0.080

− 0.919

1.695

0.355

0.335

− 0.180

− 1.134

− 0.815

RK4

− 0.840

1.200

− 1.622

1.871

− 0.203

− 1.512

− 0.531

− 0.565

− 0.882

erropres

94

72

35

3

104

30

42

6

29

errode15s

85

58

30

4

135

11

9

430

6

errode45

157

93

43

9

275

122

66

101

8

t

36

38

40

42

44

46

48

50

Σerror

Present

− 0.938

0.344

0.975

− 1.861

2.128

− 1.483

0.080

1.372

 

ode15s

− 0.259

1.345

− 1.560

− 0.240

1.756

− 0.059

− 1.416

1.614

 

ode45

− 1.338

0.498

0.614

− 1.398

1.964

− 1.632

0.001

1.599

 

RK4

− 1.036

1.081

0.113

− 0.990

1.812

− 1.426

− 0.264

1.688

 

erropres

9

68

761

88

17

4

130

19

1842

errode15s

75

24

1478

76

3

96

437

4

3322

errode45

29

54

442

41

8

14

100

5

2324