Skip to main content

Table 6 Comparative study of different design antennas

From: Design optimization for microstrip antennas based on polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) substrate and carbon nanotube (CNT) conductive material in sub-6 Ghz band

Ref.

Substrate

Conductive material

Dielectric permittivity

Substrate thikness (mm)

Size (mm2)

Gain (dBi)

Effeciency

Operating bands (GHz)

[67]

FR-4

Patch: CNT

GND:Copper

4.3

1.62

80 × 80

8.86

0.95

6.63,

7.22,

7.29

[50]

Quartz glass

Graphene film

20 × 20

0.3

5.5

0.52

8.5,

11.5

[68]

PET

Free-standing CNT

3.5

Patch:

10 × 20

3.25

0.63

1.95

[69]

Textile (felt)

Carbon black ink

1.2

3

Patch:

35 × 35

6.1

0.39

3.3

[70]

PMMA and air

Metal Mesh Film (MMF)

3.7

8.5

110 × 157

6

2.46–2.75

[71]

FR-4

CNT

4.4

30 × 20

6.07

0.81

10

[72]

E-glass fiber

Flexible Polymer Matrix composite (FPMC)

1.17

1.3

50 × 55

7.9

0.71

5.8

[73]

Polyimide (PI)

Liquid Cristal (LCP)

CNT

3.5

2.9

0.3

18 × 27

19.5 × 29.5

2.61

3

0.97

0.99

2.34–2.56

4.45–5.78

Present work (circular)

PMMA

CNT

2.546

1.5

27.8 × 47.8

6.42

0.74

5.8

Present work (rectangular)

PMMA

CNT

2.546

1.5

22.8 × 39.5

5.62

0.85

5.6