Lai Q, Chen C, Zhang Z, Zhang S, Yu Q, Yang P et al (2013) The significance of antral follicle size prior to stimulation in predicting ovarian response in a multiple dose GnRH antagonist protocol. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 6(2):258–266
CAS
Google Scholar
La Marca A, Sunkara SK (2014) Individualization of controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF using ovarian reserve markers: from theory to practice. Hum Reprod Update 20(1):124–140
Article
Google Scholar
van der Gaast MH, Eijkemans MJ, van der Net JB, de Boer EJ, Burger CW, van Leeuwen FE et al (2006) Optimum number of oocytes for a successful first IVF treatment cycle. Reprod Biomed Online 13(4):476–480
Article
Google Scholar
Aboulghar MA, Mansour RT (2003) Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: classifications and critical analysis of preventive measures. Hum Reprod Update 9(3):275–289
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Sunkara SK, Rittenberg V, Raine-Fenning N, Bhattacharya S, Zamora J, Coomarasamy A (2011) Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles. Hum Reprod 26(7):1768–1774
Article
Google Scholar
Tal R, Seifer DB (2013) Potential mechanisms for racial and ethnic differences in anti-Müllerian hormone and ovarian reserve. Int J Endocrinol 2013:818912
Article
Google Scholar
Broekmans FJ, Kwee J, Hendriks DJ, Mol BW, Lambalk CB (2006) A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome. Hum Reprod Update 12(6):685–718
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Lensen SF, Wilkinson J, Leijdekkers JA, La Marca A, Mol BWJ, Marjoribanks J et al (2018) Individualised gonadotropin dose selection using markers of ovarian reserve for women undergoing in vitro fertilisation plus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2(2):Cd012693
Google Scholar
Nyboe Andersen A, Nelson SM, Fauser BC, García-Velasco JA, Klein BM, Arce JC (2017) Individualized versus conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a multicenter, randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, phase 3 noninferiority trial. Fertil Steril 107(2):387–96.e4
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Li HW, Lee VC, Ho PC, Ng EH (2014) Ovarian sensitivity index is a better measure of ovarian responsiveness to gonadotrophin stimulation than the number of oocytes during in-vitro fertilization treatment. J Assist Reprod Genet 31(2):199–203
Article
Google Scholar
Tomas C, Nuojua-Huttunen S, Martikainen H (1997) Pretreatment transvaginal ultrasound examination predicts ovarian responsiveness to gonadotrophins in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 12(2):220–223
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Gallot V, Berwanger da Silva AL, Genro V, Grynberg M, Frydman N, Fanchin R (2012) Antral follicle responsiveness to follicle-stimulating hormone administration assessed by the Follicular Output RaTe (FORT) may predict in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer outcome. Hum Reprod 27(4):1066–1072
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Genro VK, Grynberg M, Scheffer JB, Roux I, Frydman R, Fanchin R (2011) Serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels are negatively related to Follicular Output RaTe (FORT) in normo-cycling women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Hum Reprod 26(3):671–677
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Haadsma ML, Bukman A, Groen H, Roeloffzen EM, Groenewoud ER, Heineman MJ et al (2007) The number of small antral follicles (2–6 mm) determines the outcome of endocrine ovarian reserve tests in a subfertile population. Hum Reprod 22(7):1925–1931
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Bessow C, Donato R, de Souza T, Chapon R, Genro V, Cunha-Filho JS (2019) Antral follicle responsiveness assessed by follicular output RaTe(FORT) correlates with follicles diameter. J Ovarian Res 12(1):48
Article
Google Scholar
Bayu P, Syam HH (2021) P-604 Effectiveness comparison of antral follicular count (AFC), follicular-output-rate (FORT), follicle-to-oocyte-index (FOI), oocyte-sensitivity-index (OSI), and follicular-sensitivity-idex (FSI) for predicting clinical pregnancy rates in IVF. Hum Reprod 36(1):1306
Google Scholar
Vrontikis A, Chang PL, Kovacs P, Lindheim SR (2010) Antral follice counts (AFC) predict ovarian response and pregnancy outcomes in oocyte donation cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 27(7):383–389
Article
Google Scholar
Coelho Neto MA, Ludwin A, Borrell A, Benacerraf B, Dewailly D, da Silva CF et al (2018) Counting ovarian antral follicles by ultrasound: a practical guide. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 51(1):10–20
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Solernou R, Peralta S, Casals G, Guimera M, Solsona M, Borras A et al (2021) The Follicular Output Rate (FORT) as a method to evaluate transdermal testosterone efficacy in poor responders. JBRA Assist Reprod 25(2):229–234
Article
Google Scholar
Li A, Zhang J, Kuang Y, Yu C (2020) Analysis of IVF/ICSI-FET outcomes in women with advanced endometriosis: influence on ovarian response and oocyte competence. Front Endocrinol 11:427
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Zhang N, Hao CF, Zhuang LL, Liu XY, Gu HF, Liu S et al (2013) Prediction of IVF/ICSI outcome based on the follicular output rate. Reprod Biomed Online 27(2):147–153
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Grynberg M, Labrosse J (2019) Understanding follicular output rate (FORT) and its implications for POSEIDON criteria. Front Endocrinol 10:246
Article
Google Scholar
Broer SL, van Disseldorp J, Broeze KA, Dolleman M, Opmeer BC, Bossuyt P et al (2013) Added value of ovarian reserve testing on patient characteristics in the prediction of ovarian response and ongoing pregnancy: an individual patient data approach. Hum Reprod Update 19(1):26–36
Article
Google Scholar
Papathanasiou A, Searle BJ, King NM, Bhattacharya S (2016) Trends in ‘poor responder’research: lessons learned from RCTs in assisted conception. Hum Reprod Update 22(3):306–319
Article
Google Scholar
Halvaei I, Ali Khalili M, Razi MH, Nottola SA (2012) The effect of immature oocytes quantity on the rates of oocytes maturity and morphology, fertilization, and embryo development in ICSI cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 29(8):803–810
Article
Google Scholar
Grøndahl ML, Christiansen SL, Kesmodel US, Agerholm IE, Lemmen JG, Lundstrøm P et al (2017) Effect of women’s age on embryo morphology, cleavage rate and competence-A multicenter cohort study. PLoS ONE 12(4):e0172456
Article
Google Scholar
Poulain M, Younes R, Pirtea P, Trichereau J, Ziegler D, Benammar A et al (2021) Impact of ovarian yield—number of total and mature oocytes per antral follicular count—on live birth occurrence after IVF treatment. Front Med 8:1164
Article
Google Scholar
Moon KY, Kim H, Lee JY, Lee JR, Jee BC, Suh CS et al (2016) Nomogram to predict the number of oocytes retrieved in controlled ovarian stimulation. Clin Exp Reprod Med 43(2):112–118
Article
Google Scholar
Revelli A, Gennarelli G, Biasoni V, Chiadò A, Carosso A, Evangelista F et al (2020) The ovarian sensitivity index (OSI) significantly correlates with ovarian reserve biomarkers, is more predictive of clinical pregnancy than the total number of oocytes, and is consistent in consecutive IVF cycles. J Clin Med 9(6):1914
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Guo Y, Jiang H, Hu S, Liu S, Li F, Jin L (2021) Efficacy of three COS protocols and predictability of AMH and AFC in women with discordant ovarian reserve markers: a retrospective study on 19,239 patients. J Ovarian Res 14(1):111
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Danis RB, Sriprasert I, Ho JR, McGinnis LK, Kumar A, Stanczyk FZ (2021) Association of bioavailable inhibin B and oocyte yield in controlled ovarian stimulation. F&S Rep 2(2):189–194
Article
Google Scholar
Sonigo C, Simon C, Boubaya M, Benoit A, Sifer C, Sermondade N et al (2016) What threshold values of antral follicle count and serum AMH levels should be considered for oocyte cryopreservation after in vitro maturation? Hum Reprod 31(7):1493–1500
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Bishop LA, Richter KS, Patounakis G, Andriani L, Moon K, Devine K (2017) Diminished ovarian reserve as measured by means of baseline follicle-stimulating hormone and antral follicle count is not associated with pregnancy loss in younger in vitro fertilization patients. Fertil Steril 108(6):980–987
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Yakubu MT, Olutoye AF (2016) Aphrodisiac activity of aqueous extract of Anthonotha macrophylla P. Beauv. leaves in female Wistar rats. J Integrat Med 14(5):400–408
Article
Google Scholar
Scheffer GJ, Broekmans FJ, Dorland M, Habbema JD, Looman CW, te Velde ER (1999) Antral follicle counts by transvaginal ultrasonography are related to age in women with proven natural fertility. Fertil Steril 72(5):845–851
Article
CAS
Google Scholar
Tal R, Seifer DB (2013) Potential mechanisms for racial and ethnic differences in antimüllerian hormone and ovarian reserve. Int J Endocrinol. 2013:1–7
Article
Google Scholar
Moolhuijsen LME, Visser JA (2020) Anti-Müllerian hormone and ovarian reserve: update on assessing ovarian function. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 105(11):3361–3373
Article
Google Scholar
Umarsingh S, Adam JK, Krishna SBN (2020) The relationship between anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels and pregnancy outcomes in patients undergoing assisted reproductive techniques (ART). PeerJ 8:e10390
Article
Google Scholar