Skip to main content

GC-MS analysis of honeybee products derived from medicinal plants



Honeybees provide a wealth of valuable natural products containing health-promoting bioactive compounds, including honey, bee bread, bee venom, bee pollen, propolis, and royal jelly. In the present study, we investigated the chemical composition of four honeybee products (bees, honey, royal jelly, and bee bread) derived from three medicinal plants (marjoram, trifolium, and citrus) using headspace GC-MS.


GC-MS analysis coupled with the headspace method resulted in identification of 24 volatile compounds in marjoram honey, 14 volatile compounds in trifolium honey, and 25 volatile compounds in citrus honey, e.g., some of these compounds appeared in all three types of honey aroma, which are 2,3-dihydro-3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl-4H-pyran-4-one, 2-furancarboxaldehyde, 5-(hydroxymethyl) and other unique compounds specific for each type where 23 compounds were from marjoram bees, 38 compounds from trifolium bees, and about 37 compounds were identified in citrus bees where 2,4-decadienal, (E, E) and methyl N-methyl anthranilate were common in all. Furthermore, the volatile compounds of all three types of royal jelly aroma were acetic acid, 2,3-dihydro-3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl-4H-pyran-4-one, 8-nonen-2-one and furfural where one compound appeared in both marjoram and trifolium royal jelly that is 2-furancarboxaldehyde,5-(Hydroxymethyl) and the volatile compounds in marjoram and citrus are 2,3-butanediol and 5-methylfurfural also only one volatile compound appear in both trifolium and citrus royal jelly that is furfur alcohol, Finally, 3 compounds from marjoram bee bread, 30 volatile compounds from trifolium bee bread, and 3 volatile compounds in citrus bee bread were identified.


A detailed metabolomic analysis of the four honey product groups revealed an intriguing chemical diversity, with each sample exhibiting its own chemical fingerprint.

1 Background

The honey bee Apis mellifera L. is an important pollinator species ecologically and economically worldwide, especially in Egypt [28]; it is essential because of its complex anatomy to collect plant nectar and chemically transform it into honey [6, 14].

Honey, bee bread, bee venom, bee pollen, propolis, and royal jelly are just a few of the valuable natural products produced by honeybees colonies and are attractive ingredients for healthy foods that include bioactive and beneficial chemicals for health [4, 5]

From ancient times, honey has been used as part of traditional medicine [9, 23]; it is a sweet natural substance produced by honey bees from nectar [3, 8].

Honey is a typical food used as an energy source; it contains simple sugars taken without being digested directly into the bloodstream. Nearly all foods pair nicely with honey since it works so well as a sweetener in hot and cold drinks and honey's ability to absorb moisture prolongs the freshness of cakes, cookies, bread, and candies [1]. Numerous elements of this usage indicate that it also serves additional purposes, such as being an antioxidant, an antibacterial, an anti-inflammatory, an anticancer, and an antiviral. The biological activity of honey is influenced mainly by its floral or geographic origin. Additionally, honey has been revealed to have some promising antibacterial and antiviral activities. As a result, honey is essentially a nutraceutical food [20].

Sugars are the primary constituent of honey [22], containing more than 200 additional components. Glucose and fructose are the most prevalent sugars, and water is the most abundant ingredient [29]. Minerals, vitamins, proteins, lipids, amino acids, phenolic compounds, enzymes, pigments, waxes, and pollen grains are examples of minor components [14, 33]. The bee species, raw material, edaphoclimatic conditions, floral source, processing, packaging, and storage conditions all affect the honey's composition, aroma, color, and flavor [13, 33].

Due to the existence of specific volatile organic components derived from the original nectar sources, the aroma of honey is the main feature [2, 7, 21, 30, 34]. It is possible to determine the honey's botanical and geographic origins by analyzing the volatile fraction of the honey. The flavor and aroma of honey vary significantly from variety to variety. Depending on the floral origin, the volatile chemicals considerably contribute to the distinctive flavor of honey. Honey aroma is quite complex, containing many tens of volatile components, and studies of the aroma composition of honey, as in all foods, traditionally utilize aromatic extracts. Different methods are employed to separate the volatile portion of honey, including hydro distillation, the method most commonly used to separate volatile components from a matrix [37].

Using GC-MS analysis, the following major chemical constituents were identified as 2,4-dimethyl-1-pentanol, 3- dihydro-4H-pyran-4-one, 3, 5-dihydroxy-6-methyl-2, 2-furancarboxaldehyde 5-hydroxy methyl, 2-butoxyethyl acetate. These substances are recognized to have some biological activities, including anti-inflammatory, antifungal, antioxidant properties, and makeup wound healing power activity [5].

Most European and Australian honey from various floral sources have also been documented to include certain benzene derivatives, such as benzaldehyde, benzyl alcohol, and 2-phenylethanol [8, 12, 35]. In addition, one of the substances that are thought to add to the aroma of honey is phenylacetaldehyde [7, 11].

Higher concentrations of linalool derivatives, linalool oxide, limonyl alcohol, 4-dimethyl-3-cyclohexene-1-acetaldehyde, a-terpineol, terpineal, and isomers of lilac aldehyde and lilac alcohol were found in the volatile compounds extracted from Spanish citrus honey using GC-MS and sensory analysis. Since sinensal isomers are found uniquely in this floral source, they are also suggested as potential chemical markers for citrus honey. It has been hypothesized that these chemicals significantly contributed to the characteristic aroma of citrus honeys [10, 11].

One of the most abundant volatile compounds in citrus honey is 4-dimethyl-3-cyclohexene-1-acetaldehyde; it has recently been reported in Greek citrus honeys [3].

Egyptian citrus honey was characterized by a higher concentration of lilac aldehyde C (isomer III), dill ether, methyl anthranilate [32], and herb oxide (isomer II). In earlier studies, citrus honey, among other varieties of honey, has been shown to have a volatile profile dominated by these substances. Also, the presence of suitable concentrations of 2-methylbutanal, 3-methylbutanal, 3-methyl-1-butanol, and 2-methyl-1-butanol was found in Egyptian clover honey. These volatile substances give food a fruity, malty flavor [17].

The sugars, acids, and other volatile honey ingredients are also thought to be responsible for honey's aroma and flavor. Various C1-C5 aldehydes and alcohols are among these volatile substances. In honey, methyl and ethyl formats have also been found when many phenylacetic esters have been shown to taste and smell similar to honey [31].

Young worker honeybees of the species A. mellifera L. generate royal jelly, which is a milky-white, extremely acidic (pH 3.1–3.9) fluid in their hypopharyngeal and mandibular glands (called nurses) [4].

Water (50–70%), proteins (9–18%), carbohydrates (7–18%), lipids (3–8%), mineral salts (1.5%), vitamins, polyphenols, enzymes, and hormones were determined to comprise the majority of royal jelly [19]. The lepidic fraction of R.J. is a distinctive and chemically exciting property. About 80–85% of this fraction are unusual short-chain hydroxy and dicarboxylic free fatty acids with 8–12 carbon atoms [4]. More than 50% of the free fatty acid content is made up of the primary compound, (E)-10-hydroxy-2-decanoic acid (10-HDA), which has not been found in any other naturally occurring products or even in products that are not directly associated with bees. In contrast to R.J.'s characterization as a mixture of proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, and phenols, which has received much study, its volatile portion has received less attention [4]. In addition, R.J. has been shown to possess some pharmacological effects, including antioxidant [19], anti-inflammatories [25, 36], antiaging, neuroprotective [25], antimicrobial [25, 26], anti-allergic, and antitumoral properties [25]. These qualities have led to the usage of R.J. in the food, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical industries [27].

Bee bread is a beehive product made from pollen that bees have collected. Proper hive management encourages pollen collecting to market for human consumption because it contains various nutrients and can be considered a valuable diet supplement. Bees treat pollen by adding honey and digestive enzymes, which are then stored in the honeycomb cells, where an anaerobic fermentation process changes its biochemistry. The amount of protein, amino acids, fatty acids, carbohydrates, mineral salts, polyphenols, and flavonoids in bee bread varies on the pollen's botanical source. Bee bread is currently being collected and consumed as a food supplement [18, 24]. Bee bread extract has antioxidant, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and neuroprotective properties [15].

Herein, we investigated the chemical composition of four honeybee products (bees, honey, royal jelly, and bee bread) raised upon three medicinal plants (marjoram, trifolium, and citrus) using GC-MS with headspace analysis followed by multivariate analysis.

2 Methods

2.1 Samples collection

Three samples each of honey, worker honeybees, bee bread, and royal jelly under investigation were obtained from apiaries located in different monofloral honey production regions in Egypt in each season of 2019 seasons during the flowering period of the following plants: Citrus sp (Murcott tangerine L. and Jaffa orange L.) at Wadi Al-Mollak region in Ismailia governorate in April, marjoram (Origanum majorana L.) from Sawiris Al-Gali manor, Tamiya district, Fayoum governorate, and Egyptian clover (Trifolium alexandrinum L.) in Mansoura region, Dakahlia Governorate, end of June 2019. The monospecificity of the samples was confirmed by examining the color uniformity and observing the shape and size of pollen grains under the microscope in all types of samples.

2.2 Specimen preparation

The different samples (honey, worker honeybees, bee bread, and royal jelly) from marjoram, trifolium, and citrus were used separately and directly for GC-MS analysis using the headspace technique.

2.3 Equipment

Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry was used to analyze the volatile compounds in the honey, worker honeybees, propolis, and bee bread for marjoram, trifolium, and citrus.

2.4 Experimental

Sample preparation: A small amount from each sample was used directly for the GC/MS analysis.

GC/MS analysis: The GC/MS analysis was carried out using Shimadzu GC-MS, Model QP-2010 Ultra, equipped with headspace AOC-5000 auto-injector, under the following condition: Column: Rtx-5 MS 30 m length, 0.25 mm ID, 0.25 mm film thickness (Cross bond 5% diphenyl/ 95% dimethyl polysiloxane), detector: mass spectroscopy, carrier gas: helium, oven temperature program: start temperature = 40 °C with a hold time = 2 min, rate of 3 °C/minute, while the final temperature = 220 °C with a hold time = 5 min at GC-MS program as follows: ion source temperature = 200 °C, interface temperature = 250ºC solvent cut time = 2 min, run time = 60 min, ACQ mode is Scan, event time = 0.30 s, scan detector gain mode is relative, detector gain = 1.08 kv + 0.00 kv, speed = 1.666, start m/z = 35.00 and end m/z is 500.0.

2.5 Multivariate analysis

Metabo Analyst software [38] was used to perform multivariate analysis (MVA) on GC-MS-derived data. First, principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to determine the samples' metabolite composition variations and identify the characteristic metabolites in each product. Then, log10 transformation was applied to the signal intensity of all variables.

3 Results

3.1 GC-MS analysis

GC-MS analysis coupled with the headspace method for the three types of honey (marjoram honey, trifolium honey, and citrus honey) was applied and resulted in the quantification of 45 volatile compounds. Twenty-four volatile compounds were identified in marjoram honey, 14 volatile compounds in trifolium honey, and 25 volatile compounds in citrus honey; furthermore, it can be seen that some compounds appeared in all three types of honey aroma, which are 2,3-dihydro-3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl -4H-pyran-4-one, 2-furancarboxaldehyde,5-(hydroxymethyl) [5], furfural and 2-acetylfuran. Also, we can see that hydroxy acetone and methyl furoate appear in marjoram and trifolium honey only. Moreover, 1-p-menthen-9-al and fenchyl acetate appear in marjoram and citrus honey without trifolium honey, trans-beta-ionone-5,6-epoxide, and ethanol in trifolium and citrus honey.

In addition, some unique volatiles such as methane tetranitro, formic acid, 2-furanmethanol, hyacinthin, linalool oxide, and dodecanol were presented in marjoram honey. Moreover, dimethyl ether, 1,2-benzenedicarboxylic acid diethyl ester and hexacosane were found in trifolium honey. While, methane amine N-methyl (silane methyl) [10], 2-furacarboxylic acid methyl ester, n-pentadecanoic acid, tetradecano, palmitic, stearic acid, methyl stearate, methyl anthranilate [17] and nonyl methoxy acetate were presented in citrus honey, as shown in Additional file 1: Table S1.

Consequently, about 85 volatile compounds were identified by the headspace technique when applied on Egypt's marjoram, trifolium, and citrus worker honeybees. Twenty-three compounds were identified from marjoram bees, 38 compounds from trifolium bees, and about 37 compounds identified by headspace in citrus bees.

2,4-Decadienal, (E,E) and methyl N-methyl anthranilate were present in the three types of bees marjoram, citrus and trifolium bees, where butanal, 2-methyl and camphene or (Limonene) were present in marjoram and trifolium bees only and acetic acid, propanoic acid, 2-methyl, 2,3-butanediol, oxime, methoxy-phenyl, 2-pyrrolidinone and E,E-2,4-dodecadienal were present in marjoram and citrus bees. H.D. analysis also demonstrated that methane, tetranitro, pyrazine, methyl, 2-heptanon, pyrazine, 2,5-dimethyl, gamma-valero lactone and trisulfide, dimethyl were present in trifolium and citrus bees, while every bee has its unique volatile compounds as in marjoram bee. It has l-alanine ethyl amide, ammonium acetate, hexanoic acid, cyclobutene-3,4-dione, 1-dimethylamino -2-hydroxy, butanal 3-methyl, formamide, 2-hydroxymethyl-3-methyl-oxirane, butanoic acid, 3-methyl, 1,2,3-propanetriol, pentanamide, iso amyl phenyl acetate, 9-hydroxy linalool, 2-undecenal, 1-hydroxylinalool, carbamic acid, (1-phenylethyl)-, 2-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl) cyclohexyl ester, tricosane and octadecamethylcyclonon, and the volatile compounds unique for trifolium are piperazine, amylene dichloride, disulfide, dimethyl, 2-pentanol, 3-methyl, 2-heptanol, propanal, 3-(methylthio), 9,12-octadecadien-1-ol, octanal, 1-pentanol, 2-ethyl-4-methyl, 1-butanamine, 2-methyl-n-(2-methy butylidene), hyacinthin, isoartemisia ketone, carveol 1, pyrazine, 3-ethyl-2,5-dimethyl, 2-nonanone, isoborneol, decanal, dimethyl anthranilate, isobornyl acrylate, 1-nonen-3-ol and 6-methyl-bicyclo[4.2.0]octan-7-one, and citrus bee has 11 volatile compounds as shown in Additional file 1: Table S2.

Furthermore, 53 volatile compounds were presented in the royal jelly of marjoram, trifolium, and citrus. 23 volatile compounds were identified through GC-MS with Head space in marjoram royal jelly, 22 volatile compounds were identified in trifolium royal jelly, and 20 volatile compounds were presented in citrus royal jelly.

The volatile compounds of all three types of royal jelly aroma were acetic acid, 2,3-dihydro-3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl-4h-pyran-4-one, 8-nonen-2-one and furfural where one compound appeared in both marjoram and trifolium royal jelly that is 2-furancarboxaldehyde, 5-(hydroxymethyl) and the volatile compounds in marjoram and citrus are 2,3-butanediol and 5-methylfurfural, also only one volatile compound appeared in both trifolium and citrus royal jelly that is furfur alcohol, and the rest of the volatile compounds appearing in the headspace analysis are specialized for every type of royal jelly analyzed as trans-beta-ionon-5,6-epoxid, methane tetranitro, oxirane, isobutane, formamidine acetate, d-alanine, 2,3-dihydro-3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl-1-piperazinecarboxylic acid, 2,3-butylene glycol and propiolic acid are specialized for marjoram propolis, octanoic acid, 8-hydroxy, 1-dodecanol, lauric acid, myristic acid, myristic alcohol and pentadecanoic acid for trifolium propolis and tetranitromethane, 2-pentanone, 4,4-dimethyl, hydroxy acetone, acetoin, 2,3-butanediol, 3,4,5,6,7,8-hexahydro-2h-chromene, octanoic acid, 2,4-decadienal, methyl n-methyl anthranilate and methyl linolenate for citrus propolis as shown in Additional file 1: Table S3.

Finally, the appearance of 34 volatile compounds in headspace analysis of marjoram, trifolium, and citrus bee bread resulted in 3 compounds for marjoram bee bread, 30 volatile compounds for trifolium bee bread, and 3 volatile compounds in citrus bee bread. Dimethylamine has appeared in marjoram and citrus bee bread, and carbamic acid and monoammonium salt are present in trifolium and citrus bee bread. In contrast, l-alanine ethyl amide and ethylene oxide are specialized for marjoram bee bread, pyridine-3-carboxamide, 1,2-dihydro-4,6-dimethyl-2-thioxo is specialized for citrus bee bread, while the rest or volatile compound in a table for representing the volatile compounds for trifolium or clover bee bread (Additional file 1: Table S4).

3.2 Multivariate analysis

The composition of volatile constituents in the studied honeybees and their products were investigated, and the GC-MS derived data were used to compare between them using multivariate analysis. The principal component analysis (PCA) scores plot of the GC-MS. Data (Fig. 1) showed a variation in the chemical composition of the three investigated bees and their related products (i.e., honey, royal jelly, and bread), indicating a different chemical makeup for each bee group according to the plant they raised beside.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Score plots representing PCA results based on the GC-MS data obtained for the studied honeybee groups (from marjoram, trifolium, and citrus) (A) and their related products: honey, royal jelly, and bread (BD, respectively). Red circles are for marjoram products, blue circles are for trifolium products, and green circles are for citrus products

PCA-derived variable importance in projection (VIP) scores (Table 1) was used to investigate the characteristic volatile components in each variety within each group of honey-related products (i.e., honeybees, honey, royal jelly, and bread) (variables with VIP values > 1.2).

Table 1 Dereplication table of the characteristic volatile constituents in the studied honeybee groups (from marjoram, trifolium, and citrus) and their related products

It is worth noting that there were a few by-product compounds that were detected and are highlighted in Table 1 [11], and these compounds indicate a possible exposure to high temperatures.

4 Discussion

By GC-MS analysis coupled with the headspace method for the analyzed honeybee products collected from the nectar of honeybees, especially fed on three plants with special medicinal values in Egypt namely Marjoram, Trifolium, and Citrus, the analyzed species gave different number of components present in the bees and its product as well as different from those present in the corresponding products of the other species. The analyzed Marjoram species (Origanum majorana L.) gave total number of 73 components in the bee, and it is products (honey, royal jelly and bee breed), of which 23 components were found in the bee, 24 components were found in the honey, 23 components in the royal jelly and 3 components in the marjoram bee breed, while the analyzed (Trifolium alexandrium L) gave total number of 104 components in the bee and its three products, of which 38 components were present in the bee, 14 components present in its honey, 22 components in its royal jelly and 30 components in its bee bread. The third species (Murcott tangerine L. and Jaffa orange L.) gave a total number of 85 components in the citrus bee and its three products, of which 37 components were present in the bee itself, 25 components present in citrus honey, 20 components in the royal jelly and 3 components in citrus bee bread.

Obviously, there are similar components between the bee products from the same species. As in marjoram, some volatile compounds appear in the bee and its product as royal jelly such as Acetic acid, 2-Propanone, 1-hydroxy and 2,3-Butanediol. While some compounds are similar in bee and bee bread as l-Alanine ethyl amide.

Also, some compounds appear in honey and royal jelly of marjoram: methane tetranitro, furfural, and 2-furancarboxaldehyde, 5-(hydroxymethyl).

We can see compounds in all bee products of Trifolium species as 2,3-dihydro-3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl-4H-pyran-4-one and furfural, 2-furancarboxaldehyde in honey and royal jelly, acetic acid, furfural alcohol and ammonium carbamate in royal jelly and bee bread of Trifolium, also we can see decanal, 2,4-decadienal and nonadecane in bee bread and Trifolium bee.

For citrus bee products, some volatile compounds were present in the bee and its products as a citrus royal jelly that are acetic acid, octanoic acid, 2,3-butanediol, methane tetranitro, methyl N-methyl anthranilate, and 2,4-decadienal, trans-beta-ionon-5,6-epoxide present in citrus bee and its honey.

At the end of our study, we recognize that: the chemical composition and floral source of the bees and its bee product such as honey, royal jelly and bee bread all effect by their floral, geographic, and climatic characteristics of the place and all have a significant impact on their polyphenolic content.

It is quite interesting to identify the polyphenols in bee products. Additionally, polyphenols like phenolic acids supply them with an important antioxidant potential. These antioxidants have been found to improve human health. Consuming these bee products has been noted to aid in the treatment of stomach ulcers, sore throats, wounds, and burns. Their diverse pharmacological actions, including antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, anti-inflammatory, hepatoprotective, antioxidant, and anticancer effects, have been demonstrated in several investigations [37]; as a result, a variety of analytical techniques have been used to determine the full phenolic profile of honeybee products such as GC-MS [16].

5 Conclusion

Honeybees are a source of numerous valuable natural products with health-promoting bioactive compounds, such as honey, bee bread, bee venom, bee pollen, propolis, and royal jelly. Using the headspace GC-MS analysis, we analyzed the chemical composition of four honeybee products (bees, honey, royal jelly, and bee bread) produced from three medicinal plants (marjoram, trifolium, and citrus).

Detailed metabolomic analysis of the 4 groups of honey products revealed an intriguing chemical diversity, with each strain exhibiting a distinct chemical fingerprint.

Availability of data and material

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.



Gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry


Multivariate analysis


Principal component analysis


Supplementary data




Retention time




  1. Abeshu MA, Geleta B (2016) Medicinal uses of honey. Biol Med 8:1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Alissandrakis E, Daferera D, Tarantilis PA, Polissiou M, Harizanis PC (2003) Ultrasound-assisted extraction of volatile compounds from citrus flowers and citrus honey. Food Chem 82:575–582.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Alissandrakis E, Tarantilis PA, Harizanis PC, Polissiou M (2005) Evaluation of four isolation techniques for honey aroma compounds. J Sci Food Agric 85:91–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Alvarez-Suarez JM (2017) Bee products—chemical and biological properties. Bee Prod Chem Biol Prop.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Auguistine Awasum C (2015) Gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy analysis and chemical composition of ngaoundere, cameroon honey. Am J Biosci Bioeng 3:33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ball DW (2007) The chemical composition of honey. J Chem Educ 84:1643–1646.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Blank I, Fischer KH, Grosch W (1989) Intensive neutral odourants of linden honey Differences from honeys of other botanical origin. Z Lebensm Unters Forsch 189:426–433.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bonaga G, Giumanini AG, Gliozzi G (1986) Chemical composition of chesnut honey: analysis of the hydrocarbon fraction. J Agric Food Chem 34:319–326.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Café D, Os S, Petri D, José O, Pereira R, Marcos J (2015) Estudo Comparativo da Ação Bactericida do Mel sobre Staphylococcus aureus comparative study of the honey antimicrobial activity on staphylococcus aureus. Rev Ciencias em Saude 5:117–121

    Google Scholar 

  10. Castro-Vázquez L, Díaz-Maroto MC, González-Viñas MA, Pérez-Coello MS (2009) Differentiation of monofloral citrus, rosemary, eucalyptus, lavender, thyme and heather honeys based on volatile composition and sensory descriptive analysis. Food Chem 112:1022–1030.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Castro-Vázquez L, Díaz-Maroto MC, Pérez-Coello MS (2007) Aroma composition and new chemical markers of Spanish citrus honeys. Food Chem 103:601–606.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. D’Arcy BR, Rintoul GB, Rowland CY, Blackman AJ (1997) Composition of Australian honey extractives. 1. Norisoprenoids, Monoterpenes, and other natural volatiles from blue gum (Eucalyptus leucoxylon) and yellow box (Eucalyptus melliodora) honeys. J Agric Food Chem 45:1834–1843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Da Silva PM, Gauche C, Gonzaga LV, Costa ACO, Fett R (2016) Honey: chemical composition, stability and authenticity. Food Chem 196:309–323.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. De Almeida-Muradian LB, Stramm KM, Horita A, Barth OM, Silva Da, de Freitas A, Estevinho LM (2013) Comparative study of the physicochemical and palynological characteristics of honey from Melipona subnitida and Apis mellifera. Int J Food Sci Technol 48:1698–1706.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. El-Seedi HR, Khalifa SAM, El-Wahed AA, Gao R, Guo Z, Tahir HE, Zhao C, Du M, Farag MA, Musharraf SG, Abbas G (2020) Honeybee products: an updated review of neurological actions. Trends Food Sci Technol 101:17–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gómez-Caravaca AM, Gómez-Romero M, Arráez-Román D, Segura-Carretero A, Fernández-Gutiérrez A (2006) Advances in the analysis of phenolic compounds in products derived from bees. J Pharm Biomed Anal 41:1220–1234.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Karabagias IK, Karabagias VK, Badeka AV (2019) The Honey volatile code: a collective study and extended version. Foods.

  18. Karaoglu Ö, Eroglu N, Kaplan M, Silici S (2016) Kemijski sastav i udjeli masnih kiselina u mednoj pogači. Food Technol Biotechnol 54:497–504.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Kocot J, Kiełczykowska M, Luchowska-Kocot D, Kurzepa J, Musik I (2018) Antioxidant potential of propolis, bee pollen, and royal jelly: possible medical application. Oxid Med Cell Longev.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Miguel MG, Antunes MD, Faleiro ML (2017) Honey as a complementary medicine. Integr Med Insights 12:1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Moreira RFA, De Maria CAB (2005) Investigation of the aroma compounds from headspace and aqueous solution from the cambará (Gochnatia Velutina) honey. Flavour Fragr J 20:13–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Olawode EO, Tandlich R, Cambray G (2018) 1H-NMR profiling and chemometric analysis of selected honeys from South Africa, Zambia, and Slovakia. Molecules.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Oliveira PS, Müller RCS, Dantas KD, Alves CN, De Vasconcelos MAM, Venturieri GC (2012) Ácidos fenólicos, flavonoides e atividade antioxidante em méis de Melipona fasciculata, M. flavolineata (Apidae, Meliponini) E Apis mellifera (Apidae, Apini) da Amazônia. Quim. Nova 35:1728–1732.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pasca C, Marghitas LA, Bobis O, Dezmirean DS, Margaoan R, Muresan C (2014) Total content of polyphenols and antioxidant activity of different melliferous plants. Bull UASVM Anim Sci Biotechnol 71:250–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pasupuleti VR, Sammugam L, Ramesh N, Gan SH (2017) Honey, propolis, and royal jelly: a comprehensive review of their biological actions and health benefits. Oxid Med Cell Longev.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Pavel CI, Mărghitaş LA, Bobiş O, Dezmirean DS, Şapcaliu A, Radoi I, Mădaş MN (2011) Biological activities of royal jelly—review. Sci Pap Anim Sci Biotechnol 44:108–118

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ramadan MF, Al-Ghamdi A (2012) Bioactive compounds and health-promoting properties of royal jelly: a review. J Funct Foods 4:39–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rand EED, Smit S, Beukes M, Apostolides Z, Pirk CWW, Nicolson SW (2015) Detoxification mechanisms of honey bees (Apis mellifera) resulting in tolerance of dietary nicotine. Sci Rep 5:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rosana MCP, Sinevaldo GD, Francisco DC, Aline MM, Lucio FP, Maria CAL, Romulo OB, Maria MGP, Maria CSM (2015) Evaluation of hygienic-sanitary quality of honey from Apis mellifera L. obtained in semi-arid region of Piau, Brazil. African J Microbiol Res 9:1806–1813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rowland CY, Blackman AJ, Arcy BRD, Rintoule GB (1995) Comparison of organic extractives found in leatherwood (Eucryphia lucida) honey and leatherwood flowers and leaves. J Agric Food Chem 43:753–763

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Santos-Buelga C, González-Paramás AM (2017) Chemical composition of honey. Bee Prod Chem Biol Prop 84:43–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Serra Bonvehi J (1988) Determinacion de antranilato de metilo en la miel de citricos (Citrus sp.) del Levante Español, y su influencia en la actividad diastasica de la miel. Alimentaria 197:39–40

    Google Scholar 

  33. Silva TMS, dos Santos FP, Evangelista-Rodrigues A, da Silva EMS, da Silva GS, de Novais JS, dos Santos FD, Camara CA (2013) Phenolic compounds, melissopalynological, physicochemical analysis and antioxidant activity of jandaíra (Melipona subnitida) honey. J Food Compos Anal 29:10–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Soria AC, González M, De Lorenzo C, Martínez-Castro I, Sanz J (2005) Estimation of the honeydew ratio in honey samples from their physicochemical data and from their volatile composition obtained by SPME and GC-MS. J Sci Food Agric 85:817–824.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Soria AC, Martínez-Castro I, Sanz J (2003) Analysis of volatile composition of honey by solid phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Sep Sci 26:793–801.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Teixeira RR, de Souza AV, Peixoto LG, Machado HL, Caixeta DC, Vilela DD, Baptista NB, Franci CR, Espindola FS (2017) Royal jelly decreases corticosterone levels and improves the brain antioxidant system in restraint and cold stressed rats. Neurosci Lett 655:179–185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Viuda-Martos M, Ruiz-Navajas Y, Fernández-López J, Pérez-Álvarez JA (2008) Functional properties of honey, propolis, and royal jelly. J Food Sci 73:117–124.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Xia J, Psychogios N, Young N, Wishart DS (2009) MetaboAnalyst: a web server for metabolomic data analysis and interpretation. Nucleic Acids Res 37:W652–W660

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to thank Nahda University for its support. Also, Dr. Mokhtar Mohamed Bishr for his help in GC-MS analysis. We declare that there are no issues relating to journal policies


This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



MM was involved in data curation, formal analysis, investigation, funding acquisition, resources, and writing—original draft. AMS was responsible for metabolomic analysis. MMB contributed to GC-MS analysis. EWZ was responsible for samples collection. MAZ was a supervision. HMH was involved in data curation, resources, writing—review & editing and in supervision. RM was a supervision. MSH was a conceptualization and a supervision. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hossam M. Hassan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1

. Supplementary file showing GC-MS tables and figures of the different honeys' products.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Montaser, M., Sayed, A.M., Bishr, M.M. et al. GC-MS analysis of honeybee products derived from medicinal plants. Beni-Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci 12, 63 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: