Skip to main content
Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences
Download PDF

Perspectives on plant flavonoid quercetin-based drugs for novel SARS-CoV-2

Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences volume 10, Article number: 21 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The world pandemic COVID-19 caused by SARS-CoV-2 is currently claiming thousands of lives. Flavonoids abundantly present in the fruits and vegetables, especially quercetin, are shown to have antiviral activities.

Main text

This paper reviews the capability of the plant flavonoid quercetin to fight the novel coronavirus and the possibility for drug development based on this. The mode of action explaining the known pathways through which this molecule succeeds in the antiviral activity, action of quercetin on SARS-CoV-2 main protease 3CLpro, antiviral activities of its derivatives on human viruses, effect of combination of zinc co-factor along with quercetin in the COVID-19 treatment, and the regulation of miRNA genes involved in the viral pathogenesis are discussed. Proof for this concept is provided following the virtual screening using ten key enzymes of SARS-CoV-2 and assessing their interactions. Active residues in the 3D structures have been predicted using CASTp and were docked against quercetin. Key proteins 3CLpro, spike glycoprotein/ human ACE2-BOAT1 complex, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, main peptidase, spike glycoprotein, RNA replicase, RNA binding protein, papain-like protease, SARS papain-like protease/ deubiquitinase, and complex of main peptidase with an additional Ala at the N-terminus of each protomer, have shown the binding energies ranging between − 6.71 and − 3.37 kcal/ Mol, showing that quercetin is a potential drug candidate inhibiting multiple SARS-CoV-2 enzymes.

Conclusion

The antiviral properties of flavonoid and the molecular mechanisms involved are reviewed. Further, proof for this concept is given by docking of key proteins from SARS-CoV-2 with quercetin.

Graphical abstract

Background

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a highly contagious disease caused by novel severe acute respiratory syndrome-related Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) which has not been reported earlier in humans. During December 2019, this disease was first reported from Wuhan, China. Considering the widespread across the globe, crossing international borders and affecting a large percentage of the population, the World Health Organization has declared COVID-19 as a pandemic. The development of vaccines by institutions such as AstraZeneca/University of Oxford (UK), Institut Pasteur/Merck/Themis (France/USA/Austria), University of Hong Kong (China), CureVac (Germany), Moderna (USA), Inovio (USA), Clover Biopharmaceuticals (China), Novavax (USA), University of Queensland/CSL (Australia), and Sechenov University (Russia, Sputnik V), is in different phases and few are being administered, but no specific treatment protocol has so far been developed. It is indeed the need of the hour to develop rapid diagnostic kits, vaccines, novel therapeutics, and drug-repurposing for COVID-19. Questions on viral transmission, mode of action, immunity, and other critical points need to be answered urgently.

Coronaviruses (CoVs) are comparatively large enveloped viruses with single-stranded positive-sense RNA genome (29,903 bp) [1] packed within a membrane. The membrane is covered with glycoprotein spikes, offering crown-like appearance to the coronaviruses [2]. CoVs are the largest group of viruses which are the members of Nidovirales order that includes Coronaviridae, Arteriviridae, and Roniviridae families. The Coronaviridae is subdivided into alpha, beta, gamma, and delta groups. Its genome possesses a 5′ cap and a 3′ poly-A tail, permitting it to act as an mRNA for translation of the replicase polyproteins. The nonstructural proteins (Nsps) are encoded by a replicase gene that comprises ~ 20 kb, and the structural and accessory proteins are coded by about 10 kb of the viral genome [3].

To treat COVID-19, researchers are aggressively struggling to develop the vaccines and efficient drugs, which are all still in clinical trials and may take some time to reach public. Initially, hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin have been repurposed to reduce viral load in COVID-19 patients [4], but these drugs were shown less effective subsequently. In addition, molecular docking studies are also undergoing to predict suitable drugs to inhibit the virus. Sequence analysis, molecular docking, and in vitro studies have suggested that antiviral drugs such as Sofosbuvir, Ribavirin (used to treat hepatitis C), and Remdisivir (a nucleotide analog, for treating Ebola virus disease and Marburg virus infections) can be used against the new strain of coronavirus and came up with promising data [5]. Anti-parasite drug ivermectin was also reported to inhibit the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro [6]. Even with all these independent reports, it has not been easy to ascertain if the outcome is complete viral inhibition or minimal benefit at heavier adverse effects. For instance, hydroxychloroquine is widely used to treat malaria, lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis. But this drug has adverse effects such as nausea, heart problems, headache, and occasional stomach cramps with mild diarrhea.

Competency of many plant extracts to counteract various viral infections has elevated the expectations about them being the future antiviral agents. Antimicrobial effects of plant extracts are mainly due to the secondary metabolites such as tannins, alkaloids, and flavonoids. Among the secondary metabolites, flavonoids are found to have the maximum antiviral activity [7, 8]. Flavonoids are characterized as the largest group of natural polyphenols and the most widespread class of compounds in vegetables, fruits, and plant-based beverages. At least 8000 compounds with flavonoid structure have been known, among which many are responsible for the beautiful colors of flowers, fruits, and leaves [9].

Flavonoids positively impact the variables associated with atherosclerosis, including vascular reactivity, increase in platelet count and lipoprotein oxidation [10]. Antioxidant, antithrombotic, anti-inflammatory, and hypolipidemic conditions developed with the consumption of flavonoid-rich diet, lowers the cardiovascular mortality [11]. Flavonoids also have antibacterial and anti-inflammatory effects. Thus, recently, therapeutic and nutritional research focus a lot on the flavonoids. Quercetin is one of the essential natural flavonoids present in most of the fruits, vegetables, and in few plant leaves. It prevents cardiovascular diseases and is used for treating the neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases [12]. This molecule additionally offers protection against cancer, apoptosis, arthritis, ulcer, gastritis, diabetes, bladder infections and possesses antibacterial and anti-viral activities [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. The broad spectrum antiviral activity of quercetin has been well demonstrated by various scientific investigations and found as a very effective compound against many human viral diseases. In this review we discuss the mode of action and antiviral properties of quercetin. We also focus on predicting its biological actions including the inhibition of key enzymes of SARS-CoV-2 and speculated the possibility of a combinatorial drug approach by combining quercetin with zinc ions.

Prospects of quercetin as drug for nCoV

Quercetin and its modes of action

Quercetin is abundantly found in fruits such as apple and citrus and in vegetables such as onion, broccoli, kale, and tomato [20, 21]. Also, papaya leaves, green and black tea leaves, buckwheat, seeds, and grains contain considerable amounts of quercetin. Quercetin comprises two benzene rings (A and B) attached by a distinctive carbon ring C (C6–C3–C6) with a benzopyrone skeletal structure [22]. This plant flavanol is an antioxidant with multiple OH groups around the periphery, and it neutralizes the potentially damaging free radicals through the donation of hydrogen atoms. This way, quercetin justifies its antioxidant property. Quercetin acts as a strong reducing agent and protects body tissue against oxidative stress, and its antioxidant activity increases cell survival rate [23]. Its prooxidant activity promotes apoptosis in cancerous cells whereby preventing the tumor proliferation. The tumor growth inhibition assays have reported that proliferation of K562 human chronic myelogenous leukemia, HT-29 human colon adenocarcinoma, and human breast adenocarcinoma cell lines have been inhibited by quercetin [24]. Quercetin is a potential scavenger of reactive oxygen species and a strong antioxidant which chelates metal ions [25].

Another possible mode of action proposed is its interaction with various enzymes by targeting the key amino acid residues in the active sites. The anti-inflammatory activity of quercetin is attributed to the inhibition of cyclooxygenase enzyme that is responsible for the synthesis of prostanoids, including thromboxane and prostaglandins [26]. In addition, quercetin along with quercetin monoglucosides reduces the development of atherosclerosis, by inhibiting the enzyme 15-lipoxygenase which modifies low-density lipoprotein through oxidation [25]. Homology modeling, molecular docking and in vivo studies have shown that the antiviral properties of quercetin are through the inhibition of key enzymes of viral replication and packaging, reducing the viral load in the host cells. Mice receiving quercetin oral treatment were found protected against MengoM, Col. SK, MM, intraperitoneal encephalomyocarditis, and MengoM,L viral infections. This study had shown that the action of macrophages is necessary for quercetin to be effective rather than thymus [27].

Antiviral activities of quercetin and its derivatives

Quercetin interferes with the viral replication at several stages. Through inhibition of PI-3 kinase, quercetin blocks endocytosis in viruses. The transcription of viral genome is stopped by the inhibition of RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, and by promoting the cleavage of eIF4G, translation of viral proteins is disrupted. In addition, through enhanced mitochondria-associated antiviral responses, quercetin is found to increase the viral clearance [28]. All these reduce the pro-inflammatory responses.

In rauscher murine leukemia virus (RLV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), it was shown that the quercetin was competent to inhibit the viral reverse transcriptases [29]. Suppressive action of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) against encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) and vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) was significantly enhanced by quercetin. TNF induces the expression of 2',5'-oligo-adenylatesynthetase (RNase L system is an innate immunity pathway responding to a pathogen-associated molecular pattern) in combination with quercetin [30].

Quercetin also inhibits common cold-causing Rhinoviruses (RV) by reducing the replication of negative and positive strand RNA, and translation of capsid proteins [28]. Furthermore, quercetin inhibits the infection by various strains of influenza viruses, by interacting with the HA2 subunit of glycoprotein hemagglutinin of the viruses which plays an important role in the early stages of infection [31]. This flavonoid has significantly lowered the herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) infection in cell lines (Raw 264.7) by inhibiting the expression of HSV proteins such as glycoprotein D and infected cell protein (ICP0) and genes such as ICP0, UL13, and UL52 [32]. Similarly, cell line studies have proven the antiviral properties of quercetin against equid herpesvirus 1 [33] and Japanese encephalitis virus [34].

Often quercetin and its derivatives are found to complement each other in their antiviral activities. Quercetin in combination with quercitrin exhibits good anti-Dengue virus type-2 activity and reduced cytotoxicity [35]. Substituted forms of quercetin are found to have enhanced antiviral activity [36]. Quercetin and its derivative quercetin 3-O-glycosides (Q3G) show good anti-Mayaro virus [37] and anti-influenza A virus activities [38]. In addition, this glucoside derivative has antiviral efficiency against Ebola virus, both in vitro and in vivo. Q3G affects viral entry more specifically at glycoprotein-mediated step in the viral life cycle [39]. The ELISA results revealed that Q3G inhibits the replication of Zikavirus in a dose-dependent manner, as evidenced by the reduction in the expression of nonstructural protein 1 [40].

Quercetin 7-rhamnoside (Q7R) and other structural analogues, quercetin, apigenin, luteolin and catechin, were demonstrated to have suppressive activity against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus [41]. The antiviral property was through their interference in the early stage replication of the virus. Similarly, quercetin 3-rhamnoside was also found to suppress the influenza A virus replication [42]. The target proteins of quercetin in common human viruses, leading to its antiviral properties, are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Target proteins for quercetin in human viruses and their functions
Full size table

Quercetin targets SARS-CoV-2 main protease 3CLpro

The 3C-like protease (3CLpro) is a cysteine protein known as main protease in coronaviruses. This enzyme is essential for the cleavage and processing of viral polyproteins into effector proteins, facilitating virus replication and packaging within the host cells [2]. The genomes of SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 have only moderate sequence similarity (79.0%) yet 3CLpro gene is >95.0% similar and hence the inhibitors of SARS-CoV 3CLpro would be promising drugs for nCoV. Quercetin had >80.0% in vitro inhibition activity, with IC50 value of 73 μM, on the recombinant 3CLpro protein expressed in Pichia pastoris [43].

Molecular docking, SPR/FRET (Surface Plasmon Resonance/ Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer) based bioassays, and mutagenesis studies have revealed that the quercetin derivative Q3G acts as a potential inhibitor of the 3CLpro of SARS-CoV [46]. Molecular modeling and mutation studies have shown that Gln189 is one of the determining amino acid residues in catalytic pocket of SARS-CoV 3CLpro where Q3G mainly interacts, leading to enzyme inhibition.

Recent molecular docking studies and in silico screening of herbal medicines had also suggested that quercetin is one of the potential inhibitors for 3CLpro of SARS-CoV-2 [47,48,49]. A traditional Chinese medicine study reported that quercetin from Toona sinensis extract has a potent anti-SARS-CoV property which inhibits the viral cellular entry, adsorption, and penetration into the target cells [50]. Quercetin also potentially inhibits the activity of enterovirus EV71 protease 3CLpro, decelerating the viral replication. Molecular modeling and docking studies have predicted that quercetin gets inserted into the substrate-binding pocket of EV71 3CLpro, blocking substrate recognition, protein activity, and thus the virus replication [44]. These investigations point that the quercetin effective for suppressing SARS-CoV 3CLpro can target SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro also. Currently, other SARS viral proteins such as PLpro, nonstructural proteins (NSPs), and RNA-directed RNA polymerase are targeted in molecular docking with quercetin and in in vitro studies. Quercetin is reported to potentially dock with the NS2B-NS3 protease complex of dengue 2 virus (DENV-2) [45].

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had approved quercetin as safe for human consumption, as its cytotoxicity is very low (the national drug code numbers 65448-3085 and 65448-3005 [51]. The research and clinical trials are in progress to establish quercetin as a potential drug against SARS-CoV-2. So far, there are two registered clinical trials of quercetin for COVID-19, registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. The study “The possible effect of quercetin on prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19” (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04377789), started on 20 March, 2020 with 50 enrolled participants and considers the antioxidant and antiviral properties of quercetin and the possibility of developing drugs with no adverse effects.

Combination of quercetin with zinc ions

Even though zinc is an essential cofactor for many cellular enzymes, it is found to block the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) of several viruses [52, 53]. Higher levels of intracellular zinc increases the intracellular pH, affecting the RdRp activity and decreasing the viral replication. In vitro studies have shown that Zn2+ ions can inhibit SARS-CoV RdRp (nsp12) at template binding and at elongation step. Further, zinc ions can block the initiation step of RNA synthesis of equine arteritis virus (EAV) [52]. Moreover, the same study has reported that the combination of zinc ions and the zinc ionophore pyrithione efficiently inhibited coronavirus and arterivirus replication in cell cultures. In another investigation, both in vitro and in vivo experiments had shown that zinc ions can block hepatitis E virus replication by inhibiting the activity of viral RdRp [53]. The charged zinc ions require a transporter for the influx into the cell, and quercetin acts as an ionophore that mediates zinc influx into the cells through plasma membrane [54]. While correlating these results, it is evident that the combination of quercetin and zinc is a potential strategy against SARS-CoV-2, imparting greater antiviral efficacy at a lower cytotoxicity. Quercetin possibly plays a dual role by directly inhibiting the viral 3CLpro and indirectly supporting the blocking of RdRp by acting as ionophore for zinc influx.

Considering the lower side effects, many researchers have attempted the possibility of developing nCoV drugs from natural products [55,56,57]. A second study on zinc and quercetin complex in COVID-19 treatment, registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, “The study of quadruple therapy zinc, quercetin, bromelain, and vitamin C on the clinical outcomes of patients infected with COVID-19” (Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT04468139), started on 20 June, 2020, uses a quadruple therapy of zinc, quercetin, bromelain, and vitamin C on COVID-19 patients. The formulation works on the interplay between quercetin and zinc to block the SARS-CoV-2 RdRp with the assistance from the anti-inflammatory agent bromelain and antioxidant and immune booster vitamin C.

Quercetin regulates microRNA genes

The small noncoding RNAs named miRNAs perform critical roles in developmental biology and are shown to silence the viral replication in a sequence-specific manner. Few studies correlating quercetin and miRNAs have placed miRNAs directly in the defensive effect. The available data suggests that quercetin regulates the expression of miRNAs which are responding to specific diseases particularly for cancers. For instance, differential expression of multiple miRNAs was observed in lung tumor tissues when feeding with quercetin-rich diet was done. Interestingly, more frequent consumption of quercetin-rich foods was strongly associated with the expression of miRNAs belonging to the let-7 miRNA family [58]. Quercetin treatment has resulted in the upregulation of miRNA let-7c which inhibits pancreatic cancer progression by post-transcriptional activation of Numb-like (NumbL) gene [59]. In another investigation, quercetin and quercetin-3-O-galactoside, when applied in equal proportion, has downregulated the oncogenic miRNA-27a in 786-O renal cancer cells [60]. These studies showed that quercetin can also induce the expression of miRNA genes, especially in cancer cells.

In recent times, miRNA-based therapies have gripped the attention of researchers and a few precise in silico investigations are being initiated to link the genome of SARS-CoV2 with human miRNome, to understand the role of miRNAs in SARS-CoV-2 infections. An investigation based on computational studies has speculated that miR-27b plays an important regulatory role in SARS-CoV-2 infection, and it has a strong correlation with ACE2. Among the miRNAs analyzed, miR-27b was unique with a target gene in the Indian SARS-CoV2 genome which was missing in the strains from other countries [61]. Computational analyses have predicted that the genes Envelope, ORF6, and ORF1ab are targeted by different human mature miRNAs [62]. An in silico hybridization-based analysis has predicted that 22 potential miRNAs from five genomes of SARS-CoV2 are connected with 12 human miRNAs. Hsa-mir-1267, hsa-mir-1-3p, and hsa-mir-5683 are human candidate miRNAs reported to share between all the five viral SARS-CoV2 miRNAs [63]. Regrettably, there are lacking evidences suggesting that quercetin can regulate the expression of candidate miRNAs that are involved in neutralizing the viral infection. In this session, we are hypothesizing and correlating that quercetin might be regulating human candidate miRNAs which are possibly target SARS-CoV-2 genomes. The possible multiple paths through which quercetin effects its antiviral properties are presented in Fig. 1. Detailed in vitro and in vivo studies are necessary to validate the candidate miRNAs involved in SARS-CoV-2 gene expression and to demonstrate the participation of quercetin in their regulating.

Fig. 1
figure1

Multiple paths through which quercetin effects its antiviral properties

Full size image

Proof of concept

Methods

In 2020, we accessed the Google Scholar, Web of Science, and PubMed to identify publications with the search string: “quercetin*”, “flavonoid*”, “COVID-19*”, “key proteins*”, “nCoV*”, “phytomedicine*”, “drug design*”, “antiviral*”, “phytocompound*”, “virtual screening*”, “miRNA*”, “zinc*”, etc.

To give the proof for our concept that quercetin could be a potential drug against novel coronavirus, we have followed the molecular docking methodology. Three-dimensional structures of ten key proteins of coronavirus were retrieved from PDB. 2019-nCoV main protease (PDB IDs: 6LU7, 6Y84, 6YB7), 2019-nCoV receptor-binding domain of surface spike glycoprotein (S protein, PDB ID: 6M17), 2019-nCoV spike glycoprotein (PDB ID: 6VXX), 2019-nCoV RNA replicase enzyme (PDB ID: 6W9Q), 2019-nCoV RNA-binding protein (PDB ID: 6W4B), 2019-nCoV papain-like protease (PDB ID: 6W9C), SARS coronavirus papain-like protease/ deubiquitinase (PDB ID: 3E9S), 2019-nCoV RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (PDB IDs: 7BTF, 6M71, 6NUR), SARS coronavirus main peptidase (PDB ID: 2A5I), and SARS coronavirus main peptidase with an additional Ala at the N-terminus of each protomer (PDB ID: 2GTB) were the proteins used in the study. The chains of each protein/ protein complex were identified as described in PDB. The active sites of the proteins were identified using CASTp3.0 webpage. The 3D structures of the proteins and the ligand were loaded into molecular docking software AutoDock 4.2. The active sites identified were provided in AutoDock, and the docking grid was set accordingly and the docking was performed.

Results

The binding energies of few key target protein conformations with the quercetin were recorded (Table 2). The main protease or 3CLPro of novel coronavirus is a key enzyme that mediates the viral replication mediates the viral replication and transcription [64] and has been identified as a potential drug target by many researchers [72]. Three confirmations available at PDB have been independently docked with quercetin and found that all the confirmations dock with the ligand. The residues interacted were LYS88, TYR101, LYS137, GLY138, ASP289, GLY143, and CYS145 with the docking energy − 6.71 kcal/Mol (Fig. 2a–c).

Table 2 Molecular docking of various proteins of coronavirus with quercetin ligand
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure2

Molecular docking of key proteins with quercetin. a 2019-nCoV main protease (PDB ID: 6LU7). b 2019-nCoV main protease (PDB ID: 6Y84). c 2019-nCoV main protease (PDB ID: 6YB7). d 2019-nCoV receptor-binding domain of the surface spike glycoprotein (PDB ID: 6M17). e 2019-nCoV spike glycoprotein (PDB ID: 6VXX). f 2019-nCoV RNA replicase enzyme (PDB ID: 6W9Q). g 2019-nCoV RNA-binding protein (PDB ID: 6W4B). h 2019-nCoV papain-like protease (PDB ID: 6W9C). i SARS coronavirus papain-like protease/ deubiquitinase (PDB ID: 3E9S). j 2019-nCoV RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (PDB ID: 7BTF). k SARS coronavirus main peptidase (PDB ID: 2A5I). l SARS coronavirus main peptidase with an additional Ala at the N-terminus of each protomer (PDB ID: 2GTB)

Full size image

Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2)-B°AT1 complex on human cell surface recognizes SARS-CoV by interaction with the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the surface spike glycoprotein [65], and hence RBD is also a potential drug target [73]. Docking RBD with quercetin had shown good interaction at SER349, LEU441, and ASN450 with the binding energy of − 5.56 kcal/Mol (Fig. 2d). Similarly, spike glycoprotein of novel coronavirus is a promising drug target [74], and this protein was also docked with the quercetin. Residues ASP88, ASP198, ILE233, and ILE235 were found to interact with the quercetin with a good binding energy of − 5.19 kcal/Mol (Fig. 2e). ACE2 is a transmembrane protein localized at the lung alveolar epithelial cells. It acts as a monocarboxypeptidase that cleaves a single C-terminal residue from angiotensin II, producing angiotensin [75]. ACE2 was identified as a receptor for spike proteins (S protein) of SARS-CoV-2 to penetrate into host cells. It is predicted that SARS-CoV-2 infection can be introverted by inhibiting the interaction between S protein and the host ACE2. Therefore, quercetin may prevent the entry of SARS-CoV-2 into cells by impairing the binding of viral S protein to ACE2 receptor. An in vitro study showed that quercetin and its derivatives inhibit 42–48% recombinant human ACE2 activity. Their results inferred that quercetin with an IC50 of 4.48 μM found as the most potent inhibitor of recombinant human ACE2 among the other polyphenols tested [76]. Our docking studies assist in vitro and in vivo studies by predicting the target residues that bind quercetin.

According to Liu et al. [76], inhibition of ACE2 may be undesirable because functional ACE2 inhibits inflammation by reducing activation of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor pathway. SARS-CoV-2 uses ACE2 as a receptor to enter cells, and the resulting proteolysis of ACE2 contributes to lung damage. Disrupting S protein and ACE2 interactions might prevent SARS-CoV-2 entry to cells but inhibiting ACE2 activity could be detrimental to infection recovery. Molecular docking analysis also showed that quercetin has high binding affinity to the viral spike protein. Quercetin is listed as one of the top-scoring ligands for S protein-ACE2 receptor interface, and this has undergone regulatory review in the USA [77].

Key enzyme of novel coronavirus RNA replicase was also docked with quercetin. The protein interacted with the quercetin at LEU45 and THR109 residues with a binding energy of − 3.89 kcal/Mol (Fig. 2f). Replicase enzyme machinery in coronoviruses is a heavy protein complex, and any modification to this complex could deactivate the virus multiplication and transcription [78].

In RNA viruses, RNA-binding proteins play an important role in the control of many cell processes from replication to translation. The docking of RNA-binding protein 6W4B from novel coronavirus with quercetin has shown the active interaction at PRO58 and THR68 residues with a good binding energy of − 5.44 kcal/Mol (Fig. 2g).

In coronaviruses, replicase polyprotein complex has to be initially proteolytically processed to gain its functionality. This is done by two cysteine proteases, a chymotrypsin-like protease or main protease (3CLpro) and a papain-like protease (PLpro) [67, 68]. Additionally, PLpro inhibits the type I interferon signalling pathway through interaction with the STING-TRAF3-TBK1 complex leading to the reduced immunity [79]. Thus, this protein complex can be a potential drug target. Docking of 2019-nCoV papain-like protease with quercetin has shown good interaction at GLN30 with a binding energy of − 2.18 kcal/Mol (Fig. 2h). In AutoDock, the binding energies shall be lower when the docking is performed with smaller ligands such as quercetin. Similarly, docking with the SARS coronavirus papain-like protease/ deubiquitinase enzyme was also attempted. This interaction also had shown good interaction at LYS158, ASP165, and THR169 residues with a binding energy of − 3.37 kcal/Mol (Fig. 2i).

RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) is a very important protein complex for replication of coronavirus in host cell, and it is accepted as a potential drug target [80]. Chemical structures from traditional Chinese medicinal compounds which had good docking scores with RdRp of SARS CoV-19 were found to have good antiviral activity [81]. Xu et al. [82] reported that ASP760 and ASP761 are the key amino acid residues constituting the RdRp catalytic domain. In this study, three confirmations of this enzyme have separately docked with quercetin and TYR619, CYS622, ASP623, ASP761, and SER841 were found to offer good interaction with a binding energy of − 5.41 kcal/Mol (Fig. 2j). Thus, to change the confirmation of target viral proteins and to inhibit them, binding of quercetin can be at any active site of the virus protein and not necessarily at the sites which interact with the human proteins. These results show that quercetin is a strong inhibitor of viral RdRp, and further in vitro and in vivo studies can prove the potential of this wonder molecule. Targeting the RdRp active site ASP761 by quercetin could be a potential therapeutic choice for inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 replication. Aftab et al. [83] also used computational approach and predicted that ASP761 also strongly bind antiviral drug Galidesivir (a nucleotide analog, for treating Ebola virus disease, Marburg virus disease, and Zika virus) which shows that quercetin honor a similar potential as Galidesivir. Galidesivir is also under phase 1 human trial in Brazil for COVID-19 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03891420).

The SARS coronavirus main peptidase plays an essential role in the life cycle of the virus [70] and is a primary target for the development of anti-SARS agents [71]. SARS coronavirus main peptidase interacted with quercetin at TYR54, GLU55, and ASP187 residues with a binding energy of − 5.12 kcal/Mol (Fig. 2k). Confirmation of the SARS coronavirus main peptidase with an additional Ala at the N-terminus of each protomer was additionally docked with quercetin, and this also has shown interaction at THR111 and ASP153 residues with a binding energy of − 5.20 kcal/Mol (Fig. 2l).

Thus, it is shown that quercetin is a potential drug molecule for the treatment of COVID-19 in humans. All the ten key proteins we have experimented have shown good interaction at multiple amino acid residues with satisfactory binding energies. Further steps in drug formulation starting from in vitro and in vivo animal model experiments have to be initiated urgently.

Conclusion

COVID-19 is currently the world’s worst pandemic, instantly demanding the therapeutic molecules and vaccines. The quercetin has many health benefits including protection against various viral diseases, cardiovascular diseases, osteoporosis, and multiple cancers. This pleiotropic compound has functional groups which interact with different cellular targets and interrupt various cellar pathways. Earlier studies which have established the antiviral activities of quercetin shall pave way to develop effective, safe, and affordable natural formulations for the treatment and prophylaxis of novel coronavirus. This review has mainly focused on the perspective of developing quercetin-based SARS-CoV2 drugs, based on its ability to inhibit the key enzymes of the virus. The proven role of zinc in the suppression of RdRp, leading to the inhibition of viral replication, suggests its therapeutic value against SARS-CoV-2 infection. Mechanisms underlying the expression of candidate miRNA genes in the infection process, and the roles of quercetin in their regulation need to be assessed using in vitro and in vivo systems. A couple of clinical trials on using quercetin for COVID-19 treatment are in pipeline, yet extensive works have to be urgently taken up to formulate quercetin-based drugs. Further, this paper provides proof of concept by showing the docking of key proteins from SARS-CoV-2 with quercetin. All the key proteins experimented through molecular docking have docked at multiple residues with satisfactory binding energies, showing that quercetin is a potential drug molecule; further research has to be urgently diverted to in vitro and in vivo model systems to enable the use of quercetin-based drugs at the earliest.

Availability of data and materials

There are no additional data associated with this study.

Abbreviations

COVID-19:

Coronavirus disease 2019

SARS-CoV-2:

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

CASTp:

Computed Atlas of Surface Topography of proteins

3CLpro :

3C-like protease

RdRp:

RNA-dependent RNA polymerase

References

  1. 1.

    Wu F, Zhao S, Yu B, Chen YM, Wang W, Song ZG et al (2020) A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature 579(7798):265–269. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2008-3

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Liu C, Zhou Q, Li Y, Garner LV, Watkins SP, Carter LJ et al (2020) Research and development on therapeutic agents and vaccines for COVID-19 and related human Coronavirus diseases. ACS Central Sci 6(3):315–331. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.0c00272

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Nakagawa K, Lokugamage KG, Makino S (2016) Viral and cellular mRNA translation in coronavirus-infected cells. Adv Virus Res 96:165–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aivir.2016.08.001

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Gautret P, Lagier JC, Parola P, Meddeb L, Mailhe M, Doudier B et al (2020) Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial. Int J Antimicrob Agents 20(1):e105949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105949

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Elfiky AA (2020) Anti-HCV, nucleotide inhibitors, repurposing against COVID-19. Life Sci 248:e117477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117477

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Caly L, Druce JD, Catton MG, Jans DA, Wagstaff KM (2020) The FDA-approved drug ivermectin inhibits the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in vitro. Antiviral Res 178:104787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2020.104787

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kaul TN, Middleton E Jr, Ogra PL (1985) Antiviral effect of flavonoids on human viruses. J Med Virol 15(1):71–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.1890150110

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Vrijsen R, Everaert L, Boeyé A (1988) Antiviral activity of flavones and potentiation by ascorbate. J Gen Virol 69(7):1749–1751. https://doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-69-7-1749

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Iwashina T (2015) Contribution to flower colors of flavonoids including anthocyanins: a review. Nat Prod Commun 10(3):529–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/1934578X1501000335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Panche AN, Diwan AD, Chandra SR (2016) Flavonoids: an overview. J Nutr Sci 5:e47. https://doi.org/10.1017/jns.2016.41

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kumar S, Pandey AK (2013) Chemistry and biological activities of flavonoids: an overview. Sci World J 2013:e162750. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/162750

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    David AVA, Arulmoli R, Parasuraman S (2016) Overviews of biological importance of quercetin: a bioactive flavonoid. Pharmacogn Rev 10(20):84–89. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-7847.194044

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Mahmoud MF, Hassan NA, El Bassossy HM, Fahmy A (2013) Quercetin protects against diabetes-induced exaggerated vasoconstriction in rats: effect on low grade inflammation. PLoS One 8(5):e63784. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063784

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Vafadar A, Shabaninejad Z, Movahedpour A, Fallahi F, Taghavipour M, Ghasemi Y (2020) Quercetin and cancer: new insights into its therapeutic effects on ovarian cancer cells. Cell Biosci 10(1):32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13578-020-00397-0

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Haleagrahara N, Miranda-Hernandez S, Alim MA, Hayes L, Bird G, Ketheesan N (2017) Therapeutic effect of quercetin in collagen-induced arthritis. Biomed Pharmacother 90:38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2017.03.026

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Jaisinghani RN (2017) Antibacterial properties of quercetin. Microbiol Res 8(1):6877. https://doi.org/10.4081/mr.2017.6877

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Sabogal-Guáqueta AM, Munoz-Manco JI, Ramírez-Pineda JR, Lamprea-Rodriguez M, Osorio E, Cardona-Gómez GP (2015) The flavonoid quercetin ameliorates Alzheimer’s disease pathology and protects cognitive and emotional function in aged triple transgenic Alzheimer’s disease model mice. Neuropharmacology 93:134–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2015.01.027

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Sriraksa N, Wattanathorn J, Muchimapura S, Tiamkao S, Brown K, Chaisiwamongkol K (2012) Cognitive-enhancing effect of quercetin in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease induced by 6-hydroxydopamine. Evid Based Complement Altern Med 2012:823206. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/823206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Shoskes DA, Nickel JC (2011) Quercetin for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Urol Clin 38(3):279–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2011.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ferreres F, Taveira M, Pereira M, Valentao P, Andrade PB (2010) Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) seeds: new flavonols and cytotoxic effect. J Agric Food Chem 58(5):2854–2861. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf904015f

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Zhang Y, Li Y, Cao C, Cao J, Chen W, Zhang Y et al (2010) Dietary flavonol and flavone intakes and their major food sources in Chinese adults. Nutr Cancer 62(8):1120–1127. https://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2010.513800

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Wang D, Sun-Waterhouse D, Li F, Xin L, Li D (2019) MicroRNAs as molecular targets of quercetin and its derivatives underlying their biological effects: a preclinical strategy. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 59(14):2189–2201. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2018.1441123

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Xu D, Hu MJ, Wang YQ, Cui YL (2019) Antioxidant activities of quercetin and its complexes for medicinal application. Molecules 24(6):e1123. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24061123

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Chae HS, Xu R, Won JY, Chin YW, Yim H (2019) Molecular targets of genistein and its related flavonoids to exert anticancer effects. Int J Mol Sci 20(10):e2420. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20102420

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Jan AT, Kamli MR, Murtaza I, Singh JB, Ali A, Haq QMR (2010) Dietary flavonoid quercetin and associated health benefits - an overview. Food Rev Int 26(3):302–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2010.484285

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Nijveldt RJ, van Nood E, van Hoorn DEC, Boelens PG, van Norren K, van Leeuwen PAM (2001) Flavonoids: a review of probable mechanisms of action and potential applications. Am J Clin Nutr 74(4):418–425. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/74.4.418

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Veckenstedt A, Pusztai R (1981) Mechanism of antiviral action of quercetin against cardiovirus infection in mice. Antiviral Res 1(4):249–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-3542(81)90015-2

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Ganesan S, Faris AN, Comstock AT, Wang Q, Nanua S, Hershenson MB et al (2012) Quercetin inhibits rhinovirus replication in vitro and in vivo. Antiviral Res 94(3):258–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2012.03.005

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Ono K, Nakane H, Fukushima M, Chermann JC, Barré-Sinoussi F (1990) Differential inhibitory effects of various flavonoids on the activities of reverse transcriptase and cellular DNA and RNA polymerase. Eur J Biochem 190(3):469–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1990.tb15597.x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Ohnishi E, Bannai H (1993) Quercetin potentiates TNF-induced antiviral activity. Antiviral Res 22(4):327–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-3542(93)90041-G

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Wu W, Li R, Li X, He J, Jiang S, Liu S, Yang J (2016) Quercetin as an antiviral agent inhibits influenza A virus (IAV) entry. Viruses 8(1):6. https://doi.org/10.3390/v8010006

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Lee S, Lee HH, Shin YS, Kang H, Cho H (2017) The anti-HSV-1 effect of quercetin is dependent on the suppression of TLR-3 in Raw 264.7 cells. Arch Pharm Res 40(5):623–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12272-017-0898-x

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Gravina HD, Tafuri NF, Júnior AS, Fietto JLR, Oliveira TT, Diaz MAN et al (2011) In vitro assessment of the antiviral potential of trans-cinnamic acid, quercetin and morin against equid herpesvirus 1. Res Vet Sci 91(3):e158–e162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.11.010

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Johari J, Kianmehr A, Mustafa MR, Abubakar S, Zandi K (2012) Antiviral activity of baicalein and quercetin against the Japanese encephalitis virus. Int J Mol Sci 13(12):16785–16795. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms131216785

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Chiow KH, Phoon MC, Putti T, Tan BK, Chow VT (2016) Evaluation of antiviral activities of Houttuynia cordata Thunb. extract, quercetin, quercetrin and cinanserin on murine coronavirus and dengue virus infection. Asian Pacific J Tropic Med 9(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apjtm.2015.12.002

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Thapa M, Kim Y, Desper J, Chang KO, Hua DH (2012) Synthesis and antiviral activity of substituted quercetins. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 22(1):353–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2011.10.119

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    dos Santos AE, Kuster RM, Yamamoto KA, Salles TS, Campos R, de Meneses MD et al (2014) Quercetin and quercetin 3-O-glycosides from Bauhinia longifolia (Bong.) Steud. show anti-Mayaro virus activity. Parasit Vectors 7(1):130. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-130

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Fan D, Zhou X, Zhao C, Chen H, Zhao Y, Gong X (2011) Anti-inflammatory, antiviral and quantitative study of quercetin-3-O-β-D-glucuronide in Polygonum perfoliatum L. Fitoterapia 82(6):805–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2011.04.007

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Qiu X, Kroeker A, He S, Kozak R, Audet J, Mbikay M et al (2016) Prophylactic efficacy of quercetin 3-β-O-d-Glucoside against Ebola virus infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60(9):5182–5188. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.00307-16

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Wong G, He S, Siragam V, Bi Y, Mbikay M, Chretien M et al (2017) Antiviral activity of quercetin-3-β-O-D-glucoside against Zikavirus infection. Virol Sin 32(6):545–547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12250-017-4057-9

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Choi HJ, Kim JH, Lee CH, Ahn YJ, Song JH, Baek SH et al (2009) Antiviral activity of quercetin 7-rhamnoside against porcine epidemic diarrhea virus. Antiviral Res 81(1):77–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.antiviral.2008.10.002

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Choi HJ, Song JH, Park KS, Kwon DH (2009) Inhibitory effects of quercetin 3-rhamnoside on influenza A virus replication. Eur J Pharm Sci 37(3-4):329–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2009.03.002

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Nguyen TTH, Woo HJ, Kang HK, Kim YM, Kim DW, Ahn SA et al (2012) Flavonoid-mediated inhibition of SARS coronavirus 3C-like protease expressed in Pichia pastoris. Biotechnol Lett 34(5):831–838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-011-0845-8

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Yao C, Xi C, Hu K, Gao W, Cai X, Qin J et al (2018) Inhibition of enterovirus 71 replication and viral 3C protease by quercetin. Virol J 15(1):116. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-018-1023-6

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Senthilvel P, Lavanya P, Kumar KM, Swetha R, Anitha P, Bag S et al (2013) Flavonoid from Carica papaya inhibits NS2B-NS3 protease and prevents Dengue 2 viral assembly. Bioinformation 9(18):889–895. https://doi.org/10.6026/97320630009889

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Chen L, Li J, Luo C, Liu H, Xu W, Chen G et al (2006) Binding interaction of quercetin-3-β-galactoside and its synthetic derivatives with SARS-CoV 3CLpro: structure-activity relationship studies reveal salient pharmacophore features. Bioorg Med Chem 14(24):8295–8306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2006.09.014

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Khaerunnisa S, Kurniawan H, Awaluddin R, Suhartati S, Soetjipto S (2020) Potential inhibitor of COVID-19 Main Protease (Mpro) from several medicinal plant compounds by molecular docking study. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202003.0226.v1

  48. 48.

    Sampangi-Ramaiah MH, Vishwakarma R, Uma Shaanker R (2020) Molecular docking analysis of selected natural products from plants for inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 main protease. Curr Sci 118:1087–1092. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v118/i7/1087-1092

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Zhang DH, Wu KL, Zhang X, Deng SQ, Peng B (2020) In silico screening of Chinese herbal medicines with the potential to directly inhibit 2019 novel Coronavirus. J Integr Med 18(2):152–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joim.2020.02.005

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Yang Y, Islam MS, Wang J, Li Y, Chen X (2020) Traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of patients infected with 2019-new coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2): a review and perspective. Int J Biol Sci 16(10):1708–1717. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.45538

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Yi L, Li Z, Yuan K, Qu X, Chen J, Wang G et al (2004) Small molecules blocking the entry of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus into host cells. J Virol 78(20):11334–11339. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.78.20.11334-11339.2004

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Te Velthuis AJW, van den Worm SHE, Sims AC, Baric RS, Snijder EJ, van Hemert MJ Zn2+ inhibits coronavirus and arterivirus RNA polymerase activity in vitro and zinc ionophores block the replication of these viruses in cell culture. PLoS Pathog 11:e1001176. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1001176

  53. 53.

    Kaushik N, Subramani C, Anang S, Muthumohan R, Nayak B, Ranjith-Kumar CT et al (2017) Zinc salts block hepatitis e virus replication by inhibiting the activity of viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. J Virol 91(21):e00754–e00717. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00754-17

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Dabbagh-Bazarbachi H, Clergeaud G, Quesada M, Ortiz M, O’Sullivan CK, Fernández-Larrea JB et al (2014) Zinc ionophore activity of quercetin and epigallocatechin-gallate: from Hepa 1-6 cells to a liposome model. J Agric Food Chem 13:8085–8093. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf5014633

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    ul Qamar MT, Alqahtani SM, Alamri MA, Chen LL (2020) Structural basis of SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro and anti-COVID-19 drug discovery from medicinal plants. J Pharm Anal 10(4):313–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpha.2020.03.009

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Wahedi HM, Ahmad S, Abbasi SW (2020) Stilbene-based natural compounds as promising drug candidates against COVID-19. J Biomol Struct Dyn:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2020.1762743

  57. 57.

    Williamson G, Kerimi A (2020) Testing of natural products in clinical trials targeting the SARS-CoV-2 (Covid-19) viral spike protein-angiotensin converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) interaction. Biochem Pharmacol 178:114123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2020.114123

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Lam TK, Shao S, Zhao Y, Marincola F, Pesatori A, Bertazzi PA et al (2012) Influence of quercetin-rich food intake on microRNA expression in lung cancer tissues. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21(12):2176–2184. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0745

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Nwaeburu C, Bauer N, Zhao Z, Abukiwan A, Gladkich J, Benner A et al (2016) Up-regulation of microRNA let-7c by quercetin inhibits pancreatic cancer progression by activation of Numbl. Oncotarget 7(36):58367–58380. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.11122

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Li W, Liu M, Xu F, Feng Y, Che JP, Wang GC et al (2014) Combination of quercetin and hyperoside has anticancer effects on renal cancer cells through inhibition of oncogenic microRNA-27a. Oncol Rep 31(1):117–124. https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2013.2811

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Sardar R, Satish D, Birla S, Gupta D (2020) Comparative analyses of SAR-CoV2 genomes from different geographical locations and other coronavirus family genomes reveals unique features potentially consequential to host-virus interaction and pathogenesis. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.21.001586

  62. 62.

    Saçar Demirci MD, Adan A (2020) Computational analysis of microRNA-mediated interactions in SARS-CoV-2 infection. Peer J 8:e9369. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Sarma A, Phukan H, Halder N, Madanan MG (2020) An in-silico approach to study the possible interactions of miRNA between human and SARS-CoV2. Comput Biol Chem 88:107352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2020.107352

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Jin Z, Du X, Xu Y, Deng Y, Liu M, Zhao Y et al (2020) Structure of Mpro from COVID-19 virus and discovery of its inhibitors. Nature 582(7811):289–293. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2223-y

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Yan R, Zhang Y, Li Y, Xia L, Guo Y, Zhou Q (2020) Structural basis for the recognition of SARS-CoV-2 by full-length human ACE2. Science 367(6485):1444–1448. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb2762

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Walls AC, Park YJ, Tortorici MA, Wall A, McGuire AT, Veesler D (2020) Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. Cell 181(2):281–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.058

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Ratia K, Saikatendu KS, Santarsiero BD, Barretto N, Baker SC, Stevens RC et al (2006) Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus papain-like protease: structure of a viral deubiquitinating enzyme. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(15):5717–5722. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0510851103

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Ratia K, Pegan S, Takayama J, Sleeman K, Coughlin M, Baliji S et al (2008) A noncovalent class of papain-like protease/ deubiquitinase inhibitors blocks SARS virus replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(42):16119–16124. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0805240105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Derosa G, Maffioli P, D’Angelo A, Di Pierro F (2020) A role for quercetin in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Phytother Res. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.6887

  70. 70.

    Lee T-W, Cherney MM, Liu J, James KE, Powers JC, Eltis LD et al (2007) Crystal structures reveal an induced-fit binding of a substrate-like Aza-peptide epoxide to SARS coronavirus main peptidase. J Mol Biol 366(3):916–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2006.11.078

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Lee T-W, Cherney MM, Huitema C, Liu J, James KE, Powers JC et al (2005) Crystal structures of the main peptidase from the SARS coronavirus inhibited by a substrate-like aza-peptide epoxide. J Mol Biol 353(5):1137–1151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2005.09.004

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Chen YW, Yiu CPB, Wong KY (2020) Prediction of the SARS-CoV-2 (2019-nCoV) 3C-like protease (3CLpro) structure: virtual screening reveals velpatasvir, ledipasvir, and other drug repurposing candidates. F1000Res 9:129. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.22457.2

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Hoffmann M, Kleine-Weber H, Schroeder S, Krüger N, Herrler T, Erichsen S et al (2020) SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell 181(2):271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.052

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Li G, De Clercq E (2020) Therapeutic options for the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Nat Rev Drug Discov 19(3):149–150. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41573-020-00016-0

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Rice GI, Thomas DA, Grant PJ, Turner AJ, Hooper NM (2004) Evaluation of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), its homologue ACE2 and neprilysin in angiotensin peptide metabolism. Biochem J 383:45–51. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20040634

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Liu X, Raghuvanshi R, Ceylan FD, Bolling BW (2020) Quercetin and its metabolites inhibit recombinant human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) activity. J Agric Food Chem 68(47):13982–13989. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.0c05064

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Smith M, Smith JC (2020) Repurposing therapeutics for COVID-19: supercomputer-based docking to the SARS-CoV-2 viral spike protein and viral spike protein-human ACE2 interface. https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.11871402.v4

  78. 78.

    Ziebuhr J (2006) The coronavirus replicase: insights into a sophisticated enzyme machinery. In: Perlman S, Holmes KV (eds) The Nidoviruses. Advances in experimental medicine and biology Vol 581 (ISBN 978-0-387-26202-4). Springer, Boston, pp 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-33012-9_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Chen X, Yang X, Zheng Y, Yang Y, Xing Y, Chen Z (2014) SARS coronavirus papain-like protease inhibits the type I interferon signaling pathway through interaction with the STING-TRAF3-TBK1 complex. Protein Cell 5(5):369–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13238-014-0026-3

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Gao Y, Yan L, Huang Y, Liu F, Zhao Y, Cao L et al (2020) Structure of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase from COVID-19 virus. Science:eabb7498. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb7498

  81. 81.

    Lung J, Lin Y-S, Yang Y-H, Chou Y-L, Shu L-H, Cheng Y-C et al (2020) The potential chemical structure of anti-SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. J Med Virol 92(6):693–697. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25761

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Xu X, Liu Y, Weiss S, Arnold E, Sarafianos SG, Ding J (2003) Molecular model of SARS coronavirus polymerase: implications for biochemical functions and drug design. Nucleic Acids Res 31(24):7117–7130. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg916

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Aftab SO, Ghouri MZ, Masood MU, Haider Z, Khan Z, Ahmad A et al (2020) Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase as a potential therapeutic drug target using a computational approach. J Transl Med 18(1):275. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02439-0

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Disclaimer

This review is based on a perspective and projected for a professional audience; the motto of this review is to stimulate new thoughts and to assist the global efforts to develop effective therapeutic molecules for COVID-19 disease. This article does not represent medical advice or recommendations to patients. The media should exercise caution and seek expert medical advice for interpretation, when referring to this article.

Funding

None.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Pusa, New Delhi, 110 012, India

    Manjesh Saakre

  2. Bioinformatics Centre, Kerala Agricultural University, Thrissur, 680 656, India

    Deepu Mathew & V. Ravisankar

Authors
  1. Manjesh Saakre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Deepu Mathew
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. V. Ravisankar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MS conducted the review of literature, consolidated the findings, and wrote part of the manuscript; DM and RV performed molecular docking, analyzed the data, and wrote part of the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deepu Mathew.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. All the authors consent to participate in the publication.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Authors declare that there are no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saakre, M., Mathew, D. & Ravisankar, V. Perspectives on plant flavonoid quercetin-based drugs for novel SARS-CoV-2. Beni-Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci 10, 21 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43088-021-00107-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • Drug design
  • Antiviral
  • Phytomedicine
  • 3CLpro
  • Zinc
  • miRNA