Skip to main content
Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences
Download PDF

Morphological and molecular identification of Sarcocystis sp. from the little grebe, Tachybaptus ruficollis (Aves: Podicipediformes), for the first time in Egypt

Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences volume 11, Article number: 21 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

In Egypt, studies of sarcocystosis in migratory and wading birds specially Podicipediformes are scarce. Therefore, the occurrence of Sarcocystis spp. in the little grebe, Tachybaptus ruficollis (Podicipediformes: Podicipdidae) was investigated in Qena province, Upper Egypt. During the period from September 2017 to March 2018, muscle specimens of esophagus from 25 little grebes were examined for the occurrence of Sarcocystis spp. using light microscopy, transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and molecular tools including conventional PCR and phylogenetic analysis with both 18S rRNA and 28S rRNA genetic loci.

Results

Sarcocystis spp. were identified in 84.0% (21/25) of the T. ruficollis esophageal muscle samples by morphological analysis; each was long, ribbonlike and extended along the muscle fibers. TEM revealed a characteristic thin and wavy cyst wall and an undulating vacuolar membrane with villar protrusions of slightly variant sulci and gyri, as well as several septated compartments filled with bradyzoites. The applied 18S rRNA and 28S rRNA were not enough variable for the identification of Sarcocystis species.

Conclusion

This study is the first to report the occurrence of Sarcocystis sp. in little grebes in Egypt. Further studies are required to identify Sarcocystis spp. in various wild birds by ITS1 region in Egypt.

Graphical abstract

1 Background

Sarcocystis (Eucoccidiorida: Sarcocystidae) species are protozoan parasites of mammals, birds and reptiles that are distributed worldwide [1]. They are characterized by an obligatory two-host life cycle, consisting of prey as an intermediate host and a carnivore/omnivore as a definitive host [2]. The intermediate host becomes infected through the ingestion of oocysts/sporocysts in water or food contaminated with feces and the definitive host is infected via ingestion of muscles containing sarcocysts [3].

Birds may act as intermediate or definitive hosts for various Sarcocystis species [3,4,5,6,7]. More than 25 Sarcocystis species have been identified in birds acting as intermediate hosts; however, details about the life cycle of Sarcocystis have been reported in only a few species [3, 8]. Historically, Sarcocystis species have been described based on morphological analysis of sarcocysts by light microscopy (LM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and through the detection of their definitive hosts. However, in recent decades, the majority of Sarcocystis species have been characterized with a combination of morphological and molecular analysis [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21].

Few studies have reported Sarcocystis spp. infections in birds in Egypt. To date, only two Sarcocystis species, Sarcocystis chloropusae from the common moorhen, Gallinula chloropus (Gruiformes: Rallida), and S. atraii from the common coot, Fulica atra (Gruiformes: Rallidae) have been recorded [16, 17]. The aim of the present study was to detect and characterize Sarcocystis spp. in the little grebe, Tachybaptus ruficollis (Podicipediformes: Podicipedidae), in Egypt using LM, TEM and molecular analysis.

2 Methods

2.1 Sampling

Twenty five little grebes, 11 males (one aged 6 months and ten adults aged 1 year) and 14 females (two birds aged 6 months and twelve adults aged 1 year), were sporadically found dead, probably due to unintentional catching, or died shortly on approaching, probably due to certain infections, and collected from different regions alongside the Nile River, Qena (26° 10′ 12″ N 32° 43′ 38″ E), Upper Egypt, during the period from September 2017 to March 2018.

2.2 Light microscopy

Birds were necropsied; then, small specimens with dimensions approximately 0.5 cm3 of the esophageal muscles were obtained, compressed between two glass slides, fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, stained with potassium alum carmine and then photographed [22]. In addition, approximately 1 cm3 of the same specimens was fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, cut into 5-μm-thick sections, stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE), and then photographed using a digital microscope (Leica Microsystems, CH-9435 Heerbrugg, Ec3, Singapore) [23].

2.3 Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

One sample (approximately 3 mm3) of the esophageal muscle from each infected bird was fixed in 4% cold glutaraldehyde, washed in cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2), postfixed in 2% osmium tetroxide, dehydrated with ethanol and then embedded in resin. Semithin sections were obtained using an ultramicrotome. Ultrathin sections (thickness of 500–700 A) were produced, contrasted in uranyl acetate and lead citrate, examined under a JEM 100 CXII electron microscope at 80 kV and photographed using a CCD digital camera (model XR- 41) [24].

2.4 Molecular analysis

2.4.1 DNA extraction and amplification

Genomic DNA was extracted from 5 specimens of T. ruficollis muscle tissues specimens containing sarcocysts. In addition, DNA of three identified macroscopic S. fusiformis isolated from an infected buffalo was extracted individually from each cyst to be used as positive control in the amplification. The extraction was carried out using a DNA extraction kit [Pure Link™ Genomic DNA Mini Kit (cat. no. K1820-01), Invitrogen, Thermo Scientific, USA] according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted DNA was stored at − 20 °C until use.

The genetic characteristics of Sarcocystis spp. were evaluated using partial 18S rRNA and 28S rRNA gene sequences. Both 18S rRNA and 28S rRNA gene fragments were amplified using two primer pairs (Table 1). A new primer targeting a long amplicon (812 bp) was designed using the oligoanalyzer tool (https://eu.idtdna.com/calc/analyzer) from the AF044252 GenBank deposition. For amplification, each 25 µL reaction contained 12.5 µL of 2X master mix (Geneaid Biotech Ltd., New Taipei City, Taiwan), 1 µL of pF (10 pmol/µL), 1 µL of pR (10 pmol/µL), µL of DNA sample and 7.5 µL of nuclease-free water. The PCR cycling conditions consisted of an initial activation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 37 cycles of 95 °C denaturation for 30 s, and 52 °C annealing and 72 °C extension for 1 min each. A final extension was completed at 72 °C for 7 min. PCR amplicons were electrophoresed through a 1% agarose gel in trisacetate EDTA buffer.

Table 1 Primers used for amplification of DNA extracted from the identified sarcocysts using 18S and 28S rRNA regions, with expected amplicon size and melting temperature (MT)
Full size table

2.4.2 Nucleotide sequencing

PCR products were purified with a Thermo Scientific GeneJET PCR Purification Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Baltics, Vilnius (#K0701), Lithuania) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The purified PCR products were sequenced on an Applied Biosystems 310 automated DNA sequencer using cycle sequencing ABI Prism Big Dye terminator chemistry (PerkinElmer/Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Forward and reverse PCR amplicon reads were used for sequence assembly, editing and correcting the ambiguously placed nucleotides using GeneStudio ™ Professional Edition V.2.2.0.0, and then comparison with related sequences in GenBank using the Nucleotide BLAST program [28]. The 18S rRNA and 28S rRNA region sequences of the recovered isolates were aligned using MUSCLE implemented in MEGA7 [29]; the alignments were then examined to detect intraspecific variation [30]. The start and the terminal ends of some sequences were manually truncated so that all sequences began with and terminated at the same nucleotide positions. The alignment was also manually checked to correct ambiguously placed nucleotides. The 18S rRNA and 28S rRNA region sequences were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers MH898961 and MH898981, respectively.

2.4.3 Phylogenetic analyses

Two sets of data were obtained and were phylogenetically analyzed with Bayesian inference (BI) using MrBayes V.-3.2.6 123 [31], and a best nucleotide substitution fit model was determined using MrModeltest 2.3, where the Akaike information criterion (AIC) indicated that SYM + G was the best estimator for BI settings in all datasets. Four simultaneous Markov chain Monte Carlo chains were sampled every 1000 generations for 1,000,000 generations; the first 3000 samples were discarded as burn. The average standard deviation of split frequencies was less than/equal to 0.01.

3 Results

3.1 Light and transmission electron microscopy

Of 25 examined little grebes, 21 (84.0%) birds (ten adult males and eleven adult females) were infected with the same Sarcocystis sp. by morphological analysis. There were no macroscopic lesions in the examined birds. Through LM analysis, sarcocysts in 21 specimens were observed to be long (5–12 × 0.05–0.07 mm), ribbonlike and extended along the muscle fibers (Fig. 1a). In HE-stained sections, the sarcocysts measured 40–62 µm in diameter (Fig. 1b). TEM analysis revealed a characteristic thin (0.6–0.8 µm) and wavy cyst wall. The outer cyst wall was smooth and thin with several bleb-like protrusions. The cyst contained numerous rounded to oval fragments of bradyzoites, which were appeared rounded toward the periphery (Fig. 1c, d). Beneath the cyst wall, a dense ground substance (0.6–0.7 µm thick) was found. The ground substance continued into the interior of the sarcocyst as septa which divided the cyst into several compartments.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Sarcocystis sp. obtained from the little grebe, Tachybaptus ruficollis. a A wet mount from esophageal muscles infected with sarcocysts stained with potassium alum carmine. Note the heavy infection with numerous ribbonlike sarcocysts (arrowheads). Scale bar = 1 mm. b Cross section of a thin-walled Sarcocystis sp. sarcocyst in a hematoxylin and eosin (HE)-stained histological section. Scale bar = 20 µm. c Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of Sarcocystis sp. showing zigzag-like or undulating vacuolar membrane with villar protrusions (VP) of slightly variant sulci and gyri. Scale bar = 1 µm. d A higher magnification of the TEM image reveals a cyst wall (CW) with several bleb-like protrusions (arrowhead), ground substances (GS), fragments of bradyzoites (B) with dense granules (DG) and septa (S). Scale bar = 0.5 µm

Full size image

3.2 Molecular identification

Amplification of extracted DNA from five esophagus muscle samples of five different birds using Sarcocystis-specific primers targeting the 18S rRNA gene revealed the presence of specific diagnostic bands at 1023 bp for specimens from T. ruficollis and the positive control S. fusiformis. Furthermore, PCR analysis using the same specimens with another Sarcocystis-specific primer and a designed primer targeting the 28S rRNA gene revealed specific band at 840 bp.

3.3 Phylogenetic analyses

Partial regions of the 18S rRNA and 28S rRNA genes from the present identified Sarcocystis sp. were sequenced, compared to those of other Sarcocystis taxa and aligned with two sets of data representing all appropriate species for which sequence data were available. In the first dataset, the present 18S rRNA isolate was compared to those from other Sarcocystis taxa infecting birds only: 30 sequences were obtained with 24 sequences representing 18 different known Sarcocystis taxa and 6 sequences that were isolated from avian hosts and identified as Sarcocystis spp. (Fig. 2). The second dataset included all 28S rRNA avian Sarcocystis. Eleven sequences were obtained containing six known and five unidentified avian Sarcocystis taxa (Fig. 3). For an out-group comparison, two sequences from a mammalian Sarcocystis species, S. lutrae and S. speeri (accession numbers KM657769 and KT205759, respectively) in the first data (18S rRNA) while the out-group in the second datasets (28S rRNA) included S. capracanis and S. tenella (accession numbers, KU820979 and MH413037, respectively).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Phylogenetic tree of the identified Sarcocystis sp., compared to other Sarcocystis taxa, using 18S rRNA fragment

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Phylogenetic tree of the identified Sarcocystis sp., compared to other Sarcocystis taxa, using 28S rRNA fragment

Full size image

In the present study which identified Sarcocystis sp.18S rRNA isolates at the highest query coverage (99%), 99.2% identity was shared with known S. halieti isolates (MH130211 and MF946587) and Sarcocystis wobeseri isolate (GQ922885) as well as some unidentified avian Sarcocystis spp. under accession numbers: JQ733511, GQ245670, KY348753 and EU502869. Furthermore, at the same query coverage, shared identity ranged from 99.1% to 97.9% with several avian GenBank isolates. The highest identity (99.4%) was observed in the least query coverage (92%) with S. ramphastosi (EU263366.1). In contrast, at 99% query coverage, shared identity with S. chloropusae (KJ810604) was lowest at only 97.9%.

In the identified 28S rRNA isolate, the highest query coverage was 96%. Shared identity percentage varied from 98.3% in S. rileyi (GU188426) to 99.4% in Sarcocystis calchasi (FJ232949) (Fig. 3). The highest shared identity was 99.4% (EU514792 and EU553480) at 79% query coverage, while the lowest was 98% (EU553479) at 79% query coverage (Fig. 3). The highest cover (96%) and their corresponding identity values (97.9–99.4%) were refluxed in the 18S rRNA phylogenetic tree (Fig. 2), the identified isolate was clustered with those isolates as a part of polytomy and most closely related to S. halieti specimens while lesser query covers were separated from our isolate. The avian 28S rRNA phylogenetic tree (Fig. 3) revealed the identified isolate as a distinct clade, more closely related to avian Sarcocystis spp. than to mammalian Sarcocystis spp.

Based on the morphological characteristics of the Sarcocystis spp. obtained by direct microscopy and TEM, it was found that the revealed Sarcocystis sp. was closely related to Sarcocystis halieti, but unfortunately the used markers showed limited ability to confirm the precise Sarcocystis spp.

4 Discussion

Sarcocystis spp. have previously been found at considerably high levels in adult wading birds compared to other avian intermediate hosts [32]. The little grebe has not previously been examined for the presence of sarcocysts. Herein, LM and TEM coupled with molecular analysis showed that the respective Sarcocystis sp. was found in the little grebes in Egypt.

The recovered sarcocysts were microscopic, ribbonlike and parallel to the longitudinal axis of muscle fibers. They measured 5–12 mm × 0.05–0.07 mm with a smooth and thin cyst wall measuring 0.6–0.8 µm in thickness. These morphometric features coincided with those reported by Gjerde et al. [7] (who identified S. halieti as a new Sarcocystis species, based on morphological characteristics) in S. halieti sampled from the cardiac muscles of the white-tailed sea eagle, Haliaeetus albicilla, in Norway. They were also in agreement with findings of Prakas et al. [21], who identified S. halieti in the leg, neck and breast muscles of the great cormorant, Phalacrocorax carbo, in Lithuania. The previous literature has reported the existence of several villar protrusions in the cyst wall that appear to have knob-like blebs. [7, 21]. The TEM results for Sarcocystis sp. from the current study support these previous findings. On the other hand, Lindsay et al. [33] found that S. falculata has a thick wall with fingerlike projections containing microtubules. In addition, S. lindsayi from budgerigars were found to be microscopic, long, up to 50 μm in width, and it had a cyst wall more than/equal to 2 μm thick with stylet-like protrusions [34]. In other studies, Kutkiene et al. [35] detected very long ribbon-shaped sarcocysts with a thin cyst wall and irregular villar protrusions that differed in size and shape; Prakas et al. [18] identified wavy wall sarcocysts in the jackdaw, Corvus monedula, and named the species S. corvusi; and El-Morsey et al. [24] reported that the wall of sarcocysts in G. chloropus contained fingerlike projections with a broader base and narrower tips. It is worth noting that in LM and TEM analysis, S. halieti appeared to be similar to several Sarcocystis species with birds as intermediate host, like S. calchasi, S. columbae, S. corvusi, S. lari and S. wobeseri [10, 14, 15, 18, 19, 21, 36]. Therefore, S. halieti is uniquely characterized by low intermediate host specificity [21, 37]. It must also be noted, however, that hosts are not definitively known for all Sarcocystis species included in the present phylogenetic analyses [19].

Accordingly, the development of phylogenetic analyses is critical to the delimitation of Sarcocystis species. Previous studies have shown that the use of nuclear ribosomal DNA unit loci (18S rRNA and 28S rRNA genes) can help accurately identify Sarcocystis spp., particularly those with avian intermediate hosts [19, 38]. These studies also showed that S. halieti is undistinguishable from some avian Sarcocystis spp. and almost identical when using the 28S rRNA gene (D2/D3 domain), with a higher degree of variable identity among Sarcocystis species than when using the 18S rRNA. In phylogenetic analysis conducted here, the GenBank-deposited isolates of Sarcocystis sp. (MH898961) based on the 18S rRNA locus showed 99.2% shared identity with S. halieti isolate Dkorm16 in the great cormorant in Lithuania (MH130211) [21] and S. halieti isolate Hal. 1.6 in the white-tailed sea eagle in Norway (MF946587) [7]. Interestingly, Sarcocystis sp. identified here were typically similar to other Sarcocystis spp. in various avian intermediate hosts, e.g., Sarcocystis sp. cyst type I ex Anseralbifrons isolate from the white-fronted goose, Anser albifrons, in Lithuania (EU502869) [39]; S. wobeseri isolate from the mallard duck, A. platyrhinchos (GQ922886) [10]; S. calchasi from domestic pigeons, Columba livia f. domestica, in Germany (GQ245670) [14], S. columbae isolate from the wood pigeon, Columba palumbus, in Lithuania (HM125054) [36]; and Sarcocystis sp. ex A. cooperii from a naturally infected Cooper's hawk, A. cooperii, in the USA (KY348753) [38]. In addition, our Sarcocystis sp. isolates showed 99.1% shared identity with S. corvusi isolate kuos1 from jackdaws in Lithuania (JN256117) [18] as well as 98.8% shared identity with S. lutrae isolate Ll1.11 found in the musculature of two Eurasian otters, Lutralutra, in Norway (KM657769) [40].

For the 28S rRNA locus, Sarcocystis sp. isolated in the current study (MH898981) was nearly identical (98.7%) to the recorded Sarcocystis calchasi from racing pigeons (FJ232949) [41]. However, based on the 28S rRNA locus, no S. halieti was previously recorded in GenBank sequences. Authors plan to identify Sarcocystis spp. in various wild birds by ITS1 target gene in Egypt.

Little grebes live in colonies in vegetated areas near the edge of freshwater resources; they often move into more open water, occasionally even appearing on the coast in small water ponds. Grebes are excellent swimmers that predate fish and other aquatic vertebrates; however, as they do not walk well [42], other predatory birds often consume little grebes. Currently, the regions that near from the Nile River in Qena, Upper Egypt is an excellent environment for the breeding and colonization of little grebes, which are predicted to have a high prevalence of bird–bird transmission of Sarcocystis spp. In Egypt, sarcocystosis in wild birds are scarce, so authors intended to extremely examine wild birds for Sarcocystis species in order to explain the life cycle between those birds and mammals, therefore, accurately determine the possible routs of infection in terms of control.

5 Conclusion

This study denoted the occurrence of Sarcocystis sp. in the little grebe, Tachybaptus ruficollis, for the first time in Egypt. Findings based on morphological characteristics of the identified Sarcocystis spp., by light microscopy and TEM, as well as the molecular and phylogenetic analyses. Further study based on ITS1 marker will be considered to in future studies to overcome limitations of the used markers.

Availability of data and materials

All data analyzed during this study are included in this article.

References

  1. Mehlhorn H, Heydorn AO (1978) Sarcosporidia (Protozoa, Sporozoa): life cycle and fine structure. Adv Parasitol 16:43–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-308X(08)60572-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Prakas P, Butkauskas D (2012) Protozoan parasites from genus Sarcocystis and their investigations in Lithuania. Ekologija 58:45–58. https://doi.org/10.6001/ekologija.v58i1.2349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dubey JP, Calero-Bernal R, Rosenthal BM, Speer CA, Fayer R (2016) Sarcocystosis of animals and humans, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  4. Drouin TE, Mahrt JL (1979) The prevalence of Sarcocystis Lankester, 1882, in some bird species in western Canada, with notes on its life cycle. Can J Zool 57:1915–1921. https://doi.org/10.1139/z79-254

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Munday BL, Hartley WJ, Harrigan KE, Presidente PJA, Obendorf DL (1979) Sarcocystis and related organisms in Australian wildlife: II. Survey of findings in birds, reptiles, amphibians and fish. J Wildl Dis 15:57–73. https://doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-15.1.57

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Černá Ž (1984) The role of birds as definitive hosts and intermediate hosts of Heteroxenous coccidians. J Protozool 31:579–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.1984.tb05508.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gjerde B, Vikøren T, Hammes IS (2018) Molecular identification of Sarcocystis halieti n. sp., Sarcocystis lari and Sarcocystis truncata in the intestine of a white-tailed sea eagle (Haliaeetus albicilla) in Norway. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl 7:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2017.12.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Odening K (1998) The present state of species-systematics in Sarcocystis Lankester, 1882 (Protista, Sporozoa, Coccidia). Syst Parasitol 41:209–233. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006090232343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kutkiene L, Prakas P, Sruoga A, Butkauskas D (2009) Sarcocystis in the birds family Corvidae with description of Sarcocystis cornixi sp. nov. from the hooded crow (Corvus cornix). Parasitol Res 104:329–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-008-1196-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kutkiene L, Prakas P, Sruoga A, Butkauskas D (2010) The mallard duck (Anas platyrhynchos) as intermediate host for Sarcocystis wobeseri sp. nov. from the barnacle goose (Branta leucopsis). Parasitol Res 107:879–888. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-010-1945-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kutkienė L, Prakas P, Sruoga A, Butkauskas D (2011) Identification of Sarcocystis rileyi from the mallard duck (Anas platyrhynchos) in Europe: cyst morphology and results of DNA analysis. Parasitol Res 108:709–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-010-2117-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kutkienė L, PrakasP BD, Sruoga A (2012) a) Description of Sarcocystis turdusi sp. nov. From the common blackbird (Turdus merula). Parasitology 139:1438–1443. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182012000819

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kutkienė L, Prakas P, Sruoga A, Butkauskas D (2012) Description of Sarcocystis anasi sp. nov. and Sarcocystis albifronsi sp. nov. in birds of the order Anseriformes. Parasitol Res 110:1043–1046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-011-2588-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Olias P, Gruber AD, Hafez HM, Heydorn AO, Mehlhorn H, Lierz M (2010) a) Sarcocystis calchasi sp. nov. of the domestic pigeon (Columba livia f. domestica) and the Northern goshawk (Accipiter gentilis): light and electron microscopical characteristics. Parasitol Res 106:577–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-009-1701-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Olias P, Olias L, Lierz M, Mehlhorn H, Gruber AD (2010) b) Sarcocystis calchasi is distinct to Sarcocystis columbae sp. nov. from the wood pigeon (Columba palumbus) and Sarcocystis sp. from the sparrow hawk (Accipiter nisus). Vet Parasitol 171:7–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.03.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. El-Morsey A, El-Seify M, Desouky AY, Abdel-Aziz MM, El-Dakhly KhM, Kasem S, Abdo W, Haridy M, Sakai H, Yanai T (2015) a) Morphologic and molecular characteristics of Sarcocystis atraii n. sp. (Apicomplexa: Sarcocystidae) infecting the common coot (Fulica atra) from Egypt. Acta Parasitol 60:691–699. https://doi.org/10.1515/ap-2015-0098

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. El-Morsey A, EL-Seify M, Desouky AY, Abdel-Aziz MM, Sakai H, Yanai T (2015) Sarcocystis chloropusae (protozoa: Sarcocystidae) n. sp. from the common moorhen (Gallinula chloropus) from Egypt. Parasitology 142:1063–1065. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182015000293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Prakas P, Kutkienė L, Butkauskas D, Sruoga A, Žalakevičius M (2013) Molecular and morphological investigations of Sarcocystis corvusi sp. nov. from the jackdaw (Corvus monedula). Parasitol Res 112:1163–1167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-012-3247-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Prakas P, Kutkienė L, Butkauskas D, Sruoga A, Zalakevicius M (2014) a) Description of Sarcocystis lari sp. n. (Apicomplexa: Sarcocystidae) from the great black-backed gull, Larusmarinus (Charadriiformes: Laridae), on the basis of cyst morphology and molecular data. Folia Parasitol 61:11–17 (PMID: 24684048)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Prakas P, Butkauskas D, Švažas S, Juozaitytė-Ngugu E, Stanevičius V (2018) a) Morphologic and genetic identification of Sarcocystis fulicae n. sp. (Apicomplexa: Sarcocystidae) from the Eurasian Coot (Fulica atra). J Wildl Dis 54:765–771. https://doi.org/10.7589/2017-11-279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Prakas P, Butkauskas D, Švažas S, Stanevičius V (2018) Morphological and genetic characterisation of Sarcocystis halieti from the great cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo). Parasitol Res 117:3663–3667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-018-6083-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Latif BM, Al-Delim JK, Mohamed BS, Al-Bayati SM, Al-Amiry AM (1999) Prevalence of Sarcocystis spp. in meat producing animals in Iraq. Vet Parasitol 84:85–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4017(99)00046-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. El-Dakhly KhM, El-Nesr KhA, El-Nahass E, HirataA SH, Yanai T (2011) Prevalence and distribution patterns of Sarcocystis spp. in buffaloes in Beni-Suef, Egypt. Trop Anim Health Prod 43:1549–1554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-011-9840-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. El-Morsey A, El-Seify M, Desouky AY, Abdel-Aziz MM, Sakai H, Yanai T (2014) Morphologic identification of a new Sarcocystis sp. in the common moorhen (Gallinula chloropus) (Aves: Gruiformes: Rallidae) from Brolos Lake, Egypt. Parasitol Res 113:391–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-013-3667-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang ZQ, Zuo YX, Ding B, Chen XW, Luo J, Zhang YP (2001) Identification of Sarcocystis hominis-like (Protozoa: Sarcocystidae) cyst in water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) based on 18S rRNA gene sequences. J Parasitol 87:934–937. https://doi.org/10.1645/0022-3395(2001)087[0934:IOSHLP]2.0.CO;2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rosenthal BM, Dunams DB, Pritt B (2008) Restricted genetic diversity in the ubiquitous cattle parasite, Sarcocystis cruzi. Infect Genet Evol 8(5):588–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2008.04.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mugridge NB, Morrison DA, Johnson AM, Luton K, Dubey JP, Votypka J, Tenter AM (1999) Phylogenetic relationships of the genus Frenkelia : a review of its history and new knowledge gained from comparison of large subunit ribosomal ribonucleic acid gene sequences. Int J Parasitol 29:957–972. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7519(99)00062-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gjerde B (2013) Phylogenetic relationships among Sarcocystis species in cervids, cattle and sheep inferred from the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene. Int J Parasitol 43:579–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2013.02.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33:1870–1874. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol 61:539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Spalding MG, Atkinson CT, Carleton RE (1994) Sarcocystis sp. in wading birds (Ciconiformes) from Florida. J Wildl Dis 30:29–35. https://doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-30.1.29

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lindsay DS, Blagburn BL, Braund KG (1995) Sarcocystis spp and sarcocystosis. BAM 5:249–254

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dubey JP, Saville WJ, Stanek JF, Lindsay DS (2001) Sarcocystis neurona infections in raccoons (Procyon lotor): evidence for natural infection with sarcocysts, transmission of infection to opossums (Didelphis virginiana), and experimental induction of neurologic disease in raccoons. Vet Parasitol 100:117–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4017(01)00500-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kutkiene L, Sruoga A, Butkauskas D (2008) Sarcocystis sp. from the goldeneye (Bucephala clangula) and the mallard (Anas platyrhynchos): cyst morphology and ribosomal DNA analysis. Parasitol Res 102:691–696. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-007-0813-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Prakas P, Butkauskas D, Sruoga A, Svazas S, Kutkiene L (2011) Identification of Sarcocystis columbae in wood pigeon (Columba palumbus) in Lithuania. Vet Med Zoot 55:33–39

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gjerde B, Giacomelli S, Bianchi A, Bertoletti I, Mondani H, Gibelli LR (2017) Morphological and molecular characterization of four Sarcocystis spp., including Sarcocystis linearis n. sp., from roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in Italy. Parasitol Res 116:1317–1338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-017-5410-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lindsay DS, Verma SK, Scott D, Dubey JP, von Dohlen AR (2017) Isolation, molecular characterization, and in vitro schizogonic development of Sarcocystis sp. ex Accipiter cooperii from a naturally infected Cooper’s hawk (Accipiter cooperii). Parasitol Int 66:106–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2016.12.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Butkauskas D, Sruoga A, Kutkiene L, Prakas P (2007) Investigation of the phylogenetic relationships of Sarcocystis spp. from greylag (Anser anser) and white-fronted (Anser albifrons) geese to other cyst forming coccidia using 18S and 28S rRNA gene sequences. Acta Zool Litu 17:124–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Gjerde B, Josefsen TD (2015) Molecular characterisation of Sarcocystis lutrae n. sp. and Toxoplasma gondii from the musculature of two Eurasian otters (Lutra lutra) in Norway. Parasitol Res 114:873–886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-014-4251-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Olias P, Gruber AD, Heydorn AO, Kohls A, Mehlhorn H, Hafez HM, Lierz M (2009) A novel Sarcocystis-associated encephalitis and myositis in racing pigeons. Avian Pathol 38:121–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079450902737847

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Prokop P, Trnka A (2011) Why do grebes cover their nests? Laboratory and field tests of two hypotheses. J Ethol 29:17–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-010-0214-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the veterinarians and colleagues who participated in the collection of examined birds.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef, 62511, Egypt

    Khaled Mohamed El-Dakhly & Waleed M. Arafa

  2. Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt

    Nermean M. Hussein

Authors
  1. Khaled Mohamed El-Dakhly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Waleed M. Arafa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nermean M. Hussein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

KME was involved in data collection, sample preparing, microscopy, molecular analysis, photograph editing, manuscript writing and formatting and final editing. WMA was involved in molecular analyses, manuscript editing and microscopic examination. NMH was involved in sampling, data collection, microscopy, molecular analysis and drafting. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khaled Mohamed El-Dakhly.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El-Dakhly, K.M., Arafa, W.M. & Hussein, N.M. Morphological and molecular identification of Sarcocystis sp. from the little grebe, Tachybaptus ruficollis (Aves: Podicipediformes), for the first time in Egypt. Beni-Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci 11, 21 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43088-022-00205-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43088-022-00205-3

Keywords

  • Sarcocystis sp.
  • Tachybaptus ruficollis
  • 18S rRNA
  • 28S rRNA
  • Egypt