Skip to main content
Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences
Download PDF

Marine macroalgae polysaccharides-based nanomaterials: an overview with respect to nanoscience applications

Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences volume 11, Article number: 156 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Exploration of marine macroalgae poly-saccharide-based nanomaterials is emerging in the nanotechnology field, such as wound dressing, water treatment, environmental engineering, biosensor, and food technology.

Main body

In this article, the current innovation and encroachments of marine macroalgae polysaccharide-based nanoparticles (NPs), and their promising opportunities, for future prospect in different industries are briefly reviewed. The extraction and advancement of various natural sources from marine polysaccharides, including carrageenan, agarose, fucoidan, and ulvan, are highlighted in order to provide a wide range of impacts on the nanofood technology. Further, seaweed or marine macroalgae is an unexploited natural source of polysaccharides, which involves numerous different phytonutrients in the outermost layer of the cell and is rich in sulphated polysaccharides (SP), SP-based nanomaterial which has an enhanced potential value in the nanotechnology field.

Conclusion

At the end of this article, the promising prospect of SP-based NPs and their applications in the food sector is briefly addressed.

1 Background

Over the last few years, there has been increasing attentiveness in the pursuit of new functional and bioactive compounds, especially polysaccharides, from marine genesis for wide application in various medical and food industries [1, 2]. The earth is occupied with approximately 70% of water (aqua) bulks consisting of diversified aquatic species (spp.), for instance, benthos, planktons, and nektons. The aqua covered nearly one-half of the overall existing worldwide diversity [3]. Marine plants such as seaweeds called macroalgae are abundant geneses of sulphate-containing polysaccharides mostly, which people consumed as their regular daily diet [2, 4]. The marine species persist in free-floating in the water or bound with the rock forms furthermore in the sands or lands. Some aquatic plants are grown below the littoral zone which is not exposed to sunlight and air but present in dark photosynthesis reactions to prepare their foods [5,6,7]. In traditional experts, marine plants were used to control various diseases, especially in agriculture pesticides [7].

Seaweed or marine SP-based nanomaterials have an excessive promise for application in nano-biotechnology, biomedical engineering, and modern medicine mainly used as wound dressing, tissue engineering, gene delivery, and drug delivery [8, 9]. Now a day, marine SP-based nanomaterials have fascinated consideration as one of the most essential examinations, mainly in, chemical and biomedical research because of their low cost, abundance, nontoxicity, biodegradability, and biocompatibility [10]. In recent years, marine bio-nano-particles of polymers, metal oxides, or metals, liposomes, dendrimers, or micelles are keenly being used for various diseases such as bacteriological infection and tumour side [11]. Marine poly-sugars are easily converted into nanomaterials, nanotubes, nanofibres, micro-particles, membranes, gel, sponge forms, scaffolds, and beads, which are used for food application, nano-biotechnology, and biomedical applications [12, 13].

Marine seaweed or macroalgae is an unfathomed natural source of polysaccharides, which consists of numerous different phytonutrients whose cells are enriched with sulphate poly-sugar. In seaweed algae, cells consist of specific macromolecules or carbohydrates called sulphated polysaccharides (SP) condensing sulphate moieties in their structural poly-sugar backbone [14, 15]. The outermost layer of marine macroalgae is consists of a negative charge due to the presence of cross-linkage sulphate ion groups with multifaceted molecules of polysaccharide. The cell wall constituted of seaweed algae is mostly hemicellulose and cellulose with high contents of carbohydrate macromolecules [15, 16]. The high constituents of sulphate poly-sugar present in marine macroalgae, but also commonly in some mammals such as fish's outermost layers and a few saline condition plants, while it is absent in terrestrial plants [15, 17].

The current review is focused on the brief descriptions of sulphate polysaccharide, and SP-based nanomaterials with a side of biological and commercial applications.

2 Main body

2.1 Marine macroalgae source of sulphated polysaccharide

In the base of pigments that assist in photosynthesis reactions, aquatic macroalgae are classified into three main groups, such as red, green, and brown, which are mentioned as Phaeophyceae, Chlorophyceae, and Rediophyceae. Some sulphate poly-sugar is carrageenan from red algae, ulvans from green algae, and fucoidans in brown algae. The classified marine algae red, brown, and green species' total poly-sugar contents range from 4 to 76%, whereas green macroalgae lonely yields almost 65% of dry weight [18,19,20]. The extraction of marine macroalgae was classified into two main categories; these algae are further divided into subcategories, which are shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

a Whole diagram illustration of the origin of polysaccharides from algae, b synthesis of nanoparticles, c characterization of polysaccharides-based NPs, d and its application in different fields

Full size image

However, nowadays food scientists are pursuing better-quality approaches for manufacturing, packing, stuffing, and distributing or dispensing safe, healthy (in a good physical shape), tasty, and delicious food products for a varied group of consumers [21, 22]. Novel processing techniques, containing antioxidants or aroma, encapsulation, controlled collections of products, such as dynamic, preserving, well stuffing, or packing yields and enhanced utilizing properties of health benefits which is improved food quality and self-life of items [23, 24].

Recently, sulphate polysaccharides-based nanomaterial of marine macroalgae have been extensively studied due to their enormous nano-technological, biomedical, and food industrial functions having use in oceanic food contents, such as beneficial use in biopolymers Khedri et al. [25], biorefineries, Balina et al. [26], bioremediation Wu et al. [27], pollution controls Son et al. [28], manure Kiraci [29], weather forecasts, Piñeiro-Corbeira et al. [30], medicine, anti-tumour, anti-viral, anti-coagulant, anti-inflammatory, Mouritsen et al. [31], the industrial sector it’s used to edible, cheap, nontoxic, food packing or biodegradable packing, and easy culturing properties [32].

3 Constituent of macroalgae

Marine seaweeds consist of various contents of biomolecules in their cell and are classified based on pigments such as red algae, green algae, brown algae, and their subspecies. In marine algae, carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, and dry matter of the cell composition are mostly present [33, 34], as given in Table 1.

Table 1 Different constituents of marine algae (Kim et al. [33])
Full size table

4 Marine polysaccharide-based nanomaterials

Seaweeds or aquatic macroalgae SP-based nanomaterials have received significant attention from nanoscience researchers currently, due to their exclusive physicochemical properties as well as simple, inexpensive, stable, nontoxic, safe, hydrophilic, highly biodegradable, and good biocompatibility [35, 36]. These features are of distinctive attention in the field of nano-biotechnology and have an exclusive prospect as biomaterials. Currently, numerous scientists have studied polysaccharides SP-based nanomaterials for biomedical applications, for instance, wound dressing, cancer treatment, tissue engineering, drug delivery, gene delivery, and antimicrobial activities [35, 37, 38].

4.1 Rediophyceae: sulphate polysaccharides carrageenan and agar of red algae

The outermost layer of red macroalgae consists of micro-fibrils (β-1, 3-xylans and cellulose) and a thin matrix, these matrices are comprises 38% of sulphate poly-sugar in the form of carrageen [39]. The higher level refined yield of carrageenan was extracted from Kappalvarzii sp., whose refined production ranges from 20.4 to 28.4% [40]. The average relative molecular weight of carrageenan exists of 100 kDa or more, carrageenan is contained approximately 15–40% of ester sulphate contents, and other units such as d-galactose and 3,6-anhydrous-galactose are cross-linked by a- 1,3 and b- 1,4-glycosidic linkage from red algae carrageenan. Carrageenan is classified into subgroups based on the solubility level in potassium chloride (Kcl), such as, λ, ĸ, ɩ, ɛ, and µ where sulphate groups consist of 22–35% [39,40,41].

The ester sulphate contains in subgroups of carrageenan such as Kappa carrageenan 25–30% and 28–35% of 3,6-AG contents, Iota carrageenan containing 28–30% ester sulphate and 25–30% of 3,6-AG contents, and Lambda λ carrageenan contains 32–39% of ester sulphate range and 3,6-AG contents is not presents in lambda λ carrageenan [40]. The sums of ester sulphate are inverse proportion to the temperature stability, gel strength, and solubility such as enhanced ester sulphate level than less mechanical properties of sulphate polysaccharides [42]. The carrageenan and agarose NPs obtain from marine macroalgae, synthesis, characterization, and applied in the food industry as shown in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

a Complete diagram sketch of the derivation of polysaccharide from Rediophyceae/red algae, synthesis of agarose and carrageenan NPs, b characterization of carrageenan and agarose NPs with different parameters, c and its application in food industries

Full size image

4.2 Carrageenan Nanoparticles

The carrageenan and tri-polyphosphate nanoparticles (NPs) with nano range size, strong positive (+ ive) surface, and stable mostly used in mucosal delivery of macromolecules Rodrigues, Torres et al. [43]. Maciel et al. [44] and Saluri et al. [45] stated the effect of metallic nanomaterials on gastrointestinal (GI) release from altered ĸ-carrageenan hydrogels; they have also find out the effect of genipin cross-linkage and loaded nanoparticles on drug delivery; Fig. 2 shows carrageenan nanoparticles preparation and use in different fields. The novel synthesis of carrageenan and CS nanoparticles is more suitable for biomedical fields, especially drug delivery systems [46, 47]. The production of such nanomaterials of carrageenan in hydrophilic conditions, performing of experiment with very mild technique, to avoid the usage of organic solvents and another aggressive environment. The carrageenan-based NPs were stated as suitable carriers that can offer continuous control for drug delivery. The carrageenan NPs showed high safety, good biocompatibility, low toxicity, and against fibroblast cell lines [44, 47, 48].

4.3 Agarose Nanoparticles

Rediophyceae or red marine algae's outermost layer (cell wall) presents in a compound called agar which is responsible for constructing their cell structure [12]. Agar is a combination of two polysaccharides, namely agaropectin the non-gelling part resides in sulphated galactan, containing sulphuric esters, D-glucuronic acid, and agarose is the gelling portion which is involved in D galactose and 3,6-anhydro-l-galactose sugar; they are bonded with each other by α and β bonds [49]. The main source of agar is Gracilaria and Gelidium spp. which are commonly present on the rocks beside shorelines, agar is obtained at 100–130 °C temperature and pressure with a pH range of 5.0–6.0 [12, 49].

Furthermore, agarose is normally used for its gel-forming features to synthesize semiconductor and metal NPs. Agarose nanomaterials have shown antibacterial activity besides E. coli. Moreover, the agarose compound films can be rapidly rehabilitated to carbon–metal complex composites by carbonizing the films in the nitrogen atmosphere [50, 51]. Manivasagan and Oh [52] and Sun et al. [53] described the usage of agarose-stabilized gold nanoparticles for the detection of micromolar nucleosides concentration of DNA, the agarose-stabilized gold NPs yield detection by spectroscopic. The agarose nanoparticles are used in industrial nano-biotechnology and biomedical especially chip biosensing applications.

4.4 Phaeophyceae: sulphate polysaccharide fucoidan NPs

The fucoidan was produced by sea cucumbers and sea urchins, the more bioactive property and higher yield of fucoidan were obtained by brown algae. The molecular weight range of fucoidan is from 20 to 200 kDa and sulphate polysaccharide present in the cell wall at approximately 40% w/v dry weight. Fucoidan was obtained by various species such as Turbinaria ornate, T. ornate, T. decurrens, Sargassum ilicifolium, S. wightii, S. myriocystum, S. marginatum, Padina boergesenii, P. gymnospora, and Dictyota dichotoma. The brown seaweeds cell wall is compressed of cellulose, sulphate fucan, and align in the ratio of 1:1:3… [54, 55]. Jang et al. [56] and Lira et al. [57] described the synthesis and characterization of fucoidan coated poly-(isobutyl cynoacrylate) NPs.

Nanomaterials were synthesized by anionic emulsion polymerization and by redox radical emulsion polymerization with fucoidan as a novel coating biomaterial; fucoidan nanoparticles were synthesized on a nanoscale, as shown in Fig. 3. Leung et al. [58] and Rao et al. [59] stated the biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) by carboxy-methylated curdlan or fucoidan as stabilizing and reducing agents. Fucoidan bioactive molecule was extracted from marine brown algae Cladosiphon okamuranus which is coated or loaded by NPs using liposomes as nano-carriers. The fucoidan NPs are used against osteosarcoma and anti-cancer activity which have effective results [60, 61].

Fig. 3
figure 3

a Extraction of sulphate poly-sugar from marine macroalgae to make SP-based fucoidan NPs, b characterization of fucoidan NPs with various aspects, c and its application with different fields

Full size image

The synthesis of fucoidan nanoparticles by acetylation of fucoidan which is slightly modified by hydrophobic region, it’s mostly used in cancer treatment, especially for chemotherapeutic agent-loaded nanoparticles. Doxorubicin was used as a model chemotherapeutic agent, and the biomedical application acetylated fucoidan nanoparticles were used for drug delivery purposes (Fig. 2). The characterization of fucoidan nanoparticles used by various techniques such as SEM, EDX, XRD, TEM, NMR, UV, by their morphology and drug release properties [62, 63].

4.5 Chlorophyceae: sulphate polysaccharides ulvan nanofibres

Ulvan or green seaweed is the family of sulphate polysaccharide (SP), sulphate poly-sugar contents existing in the cell wall of green macroalgae as 9–36% in the form of Ulvan. Ulvan is a polyanionic heteropolysaccharide involved in enormous quantities of rhamnose and glucuronic acid. In the green algae, the cell wall consists of various quantities of monosaccharides for instance iduronic acid 5%, xylose 9.6%, glucuronic acid 22.5%, and rhamnose 45% these monosaccharides are linked to gathering a form of α- and β- (1, 4) glycosidic linkage to make disaccharides units. Different kinds of di-sugar, ulvan are classified into four main types, for instance, A3s, B3s, U3s, and U2s, 3 s. The outermost layer of marine algae has various functions and biological properties and is classified into different subgroups of species [64, 65], which are illustrated in Table 2 in detail. Currently, ulvan extraction from marine macro-green algae, Ulv rigida, has been used for the synthesis of nanofibres as shown in Fig. 4; these nanofibres present a unique character in such a way that they are highly used in different fields such as wound dressing, gene delivery, tissue engineering, and drug delivery purpose.

Table 2 Sulphate polysaccharide (SP)-based nanomaterial and their functions and biological properties
Full size table
Fig. 4
figure 4

a Extraction of ulvan from chlorophyceae marine green algae to make ulvan nanofibres, b characterization of ulvan nanofibres with different techniques, c and its application with various sectors

Full size image

Ulvan is an interesting candidate for nanofibres synthesis and has been magnificently introduced into industrial nano-biotechnology (Toskas et al. [66] and Weiner et al. [67]) for the isolation of polysaccharide from marine green algae which is rich in ulvan bioactive molecules that examine the spinnability property; this ulvan was fabricated to make nanofibres, which have exclusive application in physiochemical, biological, and biomedical fields, for instance, cancer treatment, wound dressing, gene delivery, tissue engineering, and drug delivery.

5 Features and industrial usages of marine macroalgae polysaccharide degrading enzyme

The trickiest thing in the processing step with the extraction of valuable components of intercellular polysaccharide from seaweed, because all compounds are compacted and filled in the cell it is so challenging to do, and even if those substances are extracted, it needs a lot of costs [77, 78]. Now a day, food scientists are interested to find out new functional components derived from high-value seaweed algae. The optimization steps are must need for conceivable extraction methods and low molecular weight of marine macroalgae poly-sugar. Hence, an analysis of the procedure of attracting the functionality of marine macroalgae polysaccharides has been actively conducted. The various components obtained, such as polymannuronate, alginic, and low molecular weight polyguluronate, which are responsible for different biological control functions are remarkable [79, 80], as presented in Table 3.

Table 3 Major sources of macroalgae that are responsible for degrading enzyme
Full size table

6 Application of sulphate polysaccharides in food industries

Sulphate poly-sugar is significantly exploited in the food industries due to its viscosity-enhancing assets, stabilizing, emulsifying, and gelling. Considering it enhances and stabilizes the food structure, they are widely active in food preparations for instance jams, jellies, and ice creams, further use in milk products as a flavour. Red algae, carrageenan sulphated galactans is the prominent commercially beneficial, sulphate poly-sugar used in fermentation industries for the preparation of various products. In food industries, SP is used for different purposes like adjustment of colloids, declining fate contents, an increase in shelf life, and so on [15, 85, 86]. The important and most preferable uses of macro marine algae are hydrocolloids, nutraceuticals, and food packaging which are briefly discussed below.

6.1 Hydrocolloids properties

The term hydrocolloid has come from the Greek words hydro means aqua and kola means gum. They are mostly presented in hydrophilic poly-sugar long chains having OH groups responsible for operative water binding and help to gel formations. The constituents which form viscous dispersions and gelatinous, as soon as they are dispersed in aqua are terms as hydrocolloids. The marine macroalgae extraction of sulphate polysaccharides such as brown and red species like agar, and carrageenan are commercially available hydrocolloids. They assist as stabilizers, thickeners, emulsifiers, and fillers in cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, foods, and numerous other industries, with unbelievably distinctive physicochemical properties [87,88,89]. Their main functions and properties are enlisted in Table 2.

The oldest demoralized commercial hydrocolloid has been used as agar since the sixteenth century. Agar is the first hydrocolloid endorsed by the Drug Administration as generally recognized as safe (GRAS) and food that utilized it as nutrition supplements additives. The red macroalgae species such as Gracilaria and Gelidium production of admirable quality agar, because they have the best gelling feature with a resistance to high temperatures. Agar has inclusive application in the processing (fermentation) of food items for instance milkshakes, nutritional milk drinks, jellies, dry food powder, jams, pastry fillings, soups, spreads, chocolate milk, organic products, brew, creams, flavours, sauces mixes, beverages, puddings, garnishes, poultry products, canned food, pet nourishment, tofu, frozen yogurt, and ice cream. The seaweed algae agar utilized in the food industries (baking) has more dominant properties than other hydrocolloid macroalgae. Besides all these food properties, agar is used in microbial and biotechnological laboratories for large-scale preparation for culture media for microorganism growth [90,91,92].

6.2 Food packing and nutraceutical properties

Sulphated polysaccharide (SP) such as ulvan, carrageenan, fucoidan, and agar are biopolymers they have reasonable significance in pharmaceutical, biomedical, microbiology, nourishment, and biotechnological fields somewhere it is utilized as exemplifying specialists, balancing out, and gelling. SP biopolymers molecules can create both non-edible as well as edible wraps or film, covers, and bags with improved restriction properties by avoiding the exchange of oxygen (O2), enhancer, moisture, and lipid content existent in food products, the different substances exist in mixed nutrition and microbial culture mediums [93,94,95]. They could be combined with commercial biopolymers for instance butyrate, polyhydroxy, polyolefins, polylactic acid with nanomaterials (nanocrystals and nanoparticles) resulting in the creation of biocomposite nanofood packing, they also have other properties of biodegradable ability and toxic free nature. The sulphated polysaccharide together with nano-formulations such as various metal nanomaterials silver, iron oxide, and magnesium oxide which is enhanced antimicrobial activity even at small ppm. Sulphated poly-sugar is used to confine the function of foodborne pathogens, for instance, Escherichia coli, Salmonella enterica, Enterococcus faecalis, and Listeria monocytogenes. Now a day highly appreciated biodegradable packing is due to reducing the daily usage of pollution and plastics, in such a way sulphated poly-sugar SP biopolymers have preferred in biofood packing [96,97,98]. Overall sketch of extraction of SP and its usage in food industries is shown in Fig. 5.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Marine macroalgae polysaccharides extraction and its application in food industries

Full size image

Nutraceuticals are the deliquesced form of the words food and pharmaceutical highly significant nutrition and its additives with benefits for food, industrial microbial, or biotechnological and biomedical fields. Nowadays, nutraceutical properties of food are attracted significant desire in the suitable application of health benefits, recently numerous research has disclosed the pharmacological assistances of sulphate polysaccharide achieved from seaweed macroalgae spp. [99, 100]. The brown- and red-coloured seaweed sp. have augmented nutrient content and well quality employed as nutritious supplements beside the regular diet because they are a rich source of soluble fibbers comprising more supplements of a biomolecule. The major constituents of sulphate are demonstrated in Table 1, while minor constituents include vitamins, fatty acids, terpenoids, minerals, polyphenols, lipoproteins, polyether, carotenoids, etc. The sulphate sugar (SP) is enriched with omega 3 fatty acids (unsaturated omega), e.g. palmitic myristic acid, arachidonic acid, and linoleic, which are saturated fatty acids. The red macroalgae contain negative charge sulphate polysaccharide which is used for different purposes in daily life for instance anti-viral, anticoagulation, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anti-cancer, and anti-tumours applications [101,102,103].

7 Emerging application of marine macroalgae polysaccharides

Explorations on marine macroalgae polysaccharide-based bio-products are responsible for a foundation for evolving new strategies and advanced processes for developing sustainable products. Studies have been innovative from the addition of new methods for investigating glycan structure and envisaging how it interacts with various microbiomes of the human gut. Currently, advanced scientific technologies should provide a virtuous understanding of how bacteria selectively consume glycan in complex bacteriological communities [104, 105]. Furthermore, glycomics, chemical probes, unravel sequence database, associating CAZyme, and computational analysis will be important to unlock next-generation compositional approaches and make a sensational innovative frontier for microbiome function [104, 106]. Several enzymes like 1, 3-β glucanase, chitinase, peroxidase, and phenylalanine ammonia-lyase were definitely improved by polysaccharides treatment from algae in tomato leaves through P. tricornutum polysaccharides have revealed admirable improvement (i.e. 238.26) amid confirmed marine macroalgae polysaccharides. The extraction of polysaccharides from marine sources is currently tested for AgO NPs fabrication as well as plant growth stimulations. AgO NPs positively trialled for antibacterial effects. Yet, as far as we know, there are recently no examines on recombinant technology of marine macroalgae to increase polysaccharide production [104, 107].

8 Market prospective and scope

Marine macroalgae-based market perspective falls in numerous food classifications such as polysaccharides, natural pigments, carotenoids, fatty acid derivatives, and single-cell proteins. Further, the small scale non-centralized manufacturing of microalgae products, consistent with established supplies, might be confining market invasion [104, 108]. Marine macroalgae-based bio-products have industrialized over the years, more substantial value to the market. Marine macroalgae biomass is recently being sold for approximately € 1000 t−1. Additionally, techno-economic exploration on the selling price of marine macroalgae polysaccharides applications assessed for moisturizers, immune stimulants, plant growth stimulants, and biofuel production, respectively. According to Eurostat data, the market for biopolymers bioactive compounds, of which marine algae-based merchandise are part, contains nearly €16.71 Billiton, and by this 2023, the global algae final products is estimated to be worth US $44.6 billion [109, 110]. A large number of aspects are finding out the structure of polysaccharides with macroalgae spp, via geographical location, harvest season, extraction, and purification approaches, difficult to commercialize. One of the potential aspects, the enzyme is used to modify the compound's structure important to accomplish bioactive compounds for the human being. So, it is significant to appreciate the structure and enzyme activity as well as marine macroalgae polysaccharides for their superior commercial prospects [111, 112].

9 Future aspects

In the future research can be attentive to the fabrication of NPs from marine macroalgae poly-sugar-based biomaterials, such as chitosan, carrageenan, fucoidan, agarose, and ulvan. Different seaweed/marine macroalgae sulphated polysaccharide have their application and intrinsic worth. The marine source algae, i.e. radiophyceae, phaeophyceae, and chlorophyceae, are anionic polysaccharides and so easily synthesize NPs with cationic polymers such as ulvan, chitosan, and agarose, which indicates its perspective as food quality, processing, coating, and biocompatible drug delivery [113, 114]. The marine macroalgae polysaccharide NPs’ fabrications in this review were mostly based on radiophyceae, chlorophyceae, and phaeophyceae, (e.g. carrageenan, fucoidan, ulvan, and agarose). The main intention of the ulvan, fucoidan, agarose, and carrageenan is to produce stable polymeric NPs, which can be attained by the opposed charge interaction of polysaccharide. Synthesized NPs have been revealed to protect food items, coating, encapsulation, biocompatibility, and sustainably. Furthermore, the benefits of marine macroalgae polysaccharides include biodegradability, nontoxic, emulsification, and encapsulation [115, 116].

10 Conclusion

The marine environment consists of numerous species where oceanic phytoplanktons, for instance seaweeds, have their metabolic and structural alteration to withstand the precarious environment for existence purposes. Marine seaweed has extensive applications in different industries, especially on the food side to boost the nutrition, food quality, and retaining characteristics of supplements and biomedical applications. The sulphate polysaccharide-based nanoparticles’ extraction from macroalgae is an extensive application in various fields of daily life, such as a synthetic polymer, by-products in nutrition, cosmetics, medicine, gene delivery, drug delivery, cancer treatment, tissue engineering, wound dressing, water treatment, and biosensor. Hence, moreover nowadays, food scientists and researchers fully focused on SP sugar conventional synthetic and animal’s derived nutritional substances in food industries, enhancing health products and eco-friendly. The isolated marine poly-sugar is inexpensive, nontoxic, abundant, biodegradable, biocompatible, and safe and has high stability. Seaweed polysaccharides-based nanomaterials have great potential in the fabric, biomedicine, pharmaceutical, and food industries for the future. For the enhancement of marine macroalgae polysaccharide-based bio-economy, it is highly domineering to study the function-structural activities and their particular mechanisms for the advanced application of marine macroalgae polysaccharides. However, cost-effective and efficient extraction and purification approaches pay the manner for viable growth of marine macroalgae poly-sugar-based industrial applications such as pharmaceutical, functional food, and food safety, also nano-cellulose, biofuels, biostimulation as well as other innovative incipient applications. This article compiles the newest advances in marine macroalgae polysaccharides, which are used in industrial applications. It also scrutinized the growing market scope for marine macroalgae polysaccharides-based nanomaterial products together with advanced products after defined health attributes.

Availability of data and materials

Data will be available upon request.

Abbreviations

NPs:

Nanoparticles

SP:

Sulphated polysaccharide

C-NPs:

Carrageenan nanoparticles

A-NPs:

Agar nanoparticles

U-NPs:

Ulvan nanoparticles

F-NPs:

Fucoidan nanoparticles

SEM:

Scanning electron microscopy

EDX:

Energy-dispersive X-ray

XRD:

X-ray diffraction

TEM:

Transmission electron microscopy

NMR:

Nuclear magnetic resonance

FTIR:

Fourier transform infrared

CD:

Circular dichroism

MS/MS:

Tandem mass spectrometry

References

  1. Mikkonen KS, Parikka K, Ghafar A, Tenkanen M (2013) Prospects of polysaccharide aerogels as modern advanced food materials. Trends Food Sci Technol 34(2):124–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2013.10.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nešić A, Cabrera-Barjas G, Dimitrijević-Branković S, Davidović S, Radovanović N, Delattre C (2020) Prospect of polysaccharide-based materials as advanced food packaging. Molecules 25(1):135. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25010135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Suplicy FM (2020) A review of the multiple benefits of mussel farming. Rev Aquac 12(1):204–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/raq.12313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Steinthorsdottir M, Coxall HK, de Boer AM, Huber M, Barbolini N, Bradshaw CD, Burls NJ, Feakins SJ, Gasson E, Henderiks J, Holbourn AE, Kiel S, Kohn MJ, Knorr G, Kürschner WM, Lear CH, Liebrand D, Lunt DJ, Mörs T, Pearson PN, Pound MJ, Stoll H, Strömberg CAE (2021) The Miocene: the future of the past. Paleoceanogr Paleoclim 36(4):e2020PA004037. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020PA004037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dittami SM, Corre E, Brillet-Guéguen L, Lipinska AP, Pontoizeau N, Aite M, Avia K, Caron C, Cho CH, Collén J, Cormier A, Delage L, Doubleau S, Frioux C, Gobet A, González-Navarrete I, Groisillier A, Hervé C, Jollivet D, KleinJan H, Leblanc C, Liu X, Marie D, Markov GV, Minoche AE, Monsoor M, Pericard P, Perrineau M-M, Peters AF, Siegel A, Siméon A, Trottier C, Yoon HS, Himmelbauer H, Boyen C, Tonon T (2020) The genome of Ectocarpus subulatus–a highly stress-tolerant brown alga. Mar Genomics 52:100740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.margen.2020.100740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Camacho F, Macedo A, Malcata F (2019) Potential industrial applications and commercialization of microalgae in the functional food and feed industries: a short review. Mar Drugs 17(6):312. https://doi.org/10.3390/md17060312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Athapaththu AMAIK, Thushari GGN, Dias PCB, Abeygunawardena AP, Egodauyana KPUT, Liyanage NPP, Pitawala HMJC, Senevirathna JDM (2020) Plastics in surface water of southern coastal belt of Sri Lanka (Northern Indian Ocean): distribution and characterization by FTIR. Mar Pollut Bull 161:111750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111750

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Saratale RG, Karuppusamy I, Saratale GD, Pugazhendhi A, Kumar G, Park Y, Ghodake GS, Bharagava RN, Banu JR, Shin HS (2018) A comprehensive review on green nanomaterials using biological systems: recent perception and their future applications. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 170:20–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.05.045

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Pandey G, Jain P (2020) Assessing the nanotechnology on the grounds of costs, benefits, and risks. Beni-Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci 9(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43088-020-00085-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mahmoodi M, Ferdowsi S, Ebrahimi-Barough S, Kamian S, Ai J (2020) Tissue engineering applications in breast cancer. J Med Eng Technol 44(4):162–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/03091902.2020.1757771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mohandas A, Deepthi S, Biswas R, Jayakumar R (2018) Chitosan based metallic nanocomposite scaffolds as antimicrobial wound dressings. Bioact Mater 3(3):267–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tao F, Cheng Y, Shi X, Zheng H, Du Y, Xiang W, Deng H (2020) Applications of chitin and chitosan nanofibers in bone regenerative engineering. Carbohydr Polym 230:115658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.115658

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zarei F, Soleimaninejad M (2018) Role of growth factors and biomaterials in wound healing. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol 46(suppl 1):906–911. https://doi.org/10.1080/21691401.2018.1439836

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Michael OS, Adetunji CO, Ayeni AE, Akram M, Adetunji JB, Olaniyan M, Muhibi MA (2021) Marine polysaccharides: properties and applications. Polysacch Prop Appl. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119711414.ch20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Muthukumar J, Chidambaram R, Sukumaran S (2021) Sulfated polysaccharides and its commercial applications in food industries—a review. J Food Sci Technol 58(7):2453–2466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-020-04837-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hassaan MA, Hosny S (2018) Green synthesis of Ag and Au nanoparticles from micro and macro algae-review. Int J Atmos Ocean Sci 2(1):10–22. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaos.20180201.12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hernández-Garibay E, Zertuche-González JA, Pacheco-Ruiz I (2019) Sulfated polysaccharides (fucoidan) from the brown seaweed Silvetia compressa (J. Agardh) E. Serrão, TO Cho, SM Boo & Brawley. J Appl Phycol 31(6):3841–3847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-019-01870-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Biris-Dorhoi E-S, Michiu D, Pop CR, Rotar AM, Tofana M, Pop OL, Socaci SA, Farcas AC (2020) Macroalgae—a sustainable source of chemical compounds with biological activities. Nutrients 12(10):3085. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12103085

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pereira L (2018) Biological and therapeutic properties of the seaweed polysaccharides. Int Biol Rev. https://doi.org/10.18103/ibr.v2i2.1762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ahmad K, Khan S, Yasin MT, Hussain S, Ahmad R, Ahmad N, Bokhari SAI (2021) Enhanced starch hydrolysis by α-amylase using copper oxide nanowires. Appl Nanosci 11(7):2059–2071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-021-01931-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mancuso I, Natalicchio A, Panniello U, Roma P (2021) Understanding the purchasing behavior of consumers in response to sustainable marketing practices: an empirical analysis in the food domain. Sustainability 13(11):6169. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Magano N, du Rand G, de Kock H (2022) Perception of gluten-free bread as influenced by information and health and taste attitudes of millennials. Foods 11(4):491. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11040491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Vasile C, Baican M (2021) Progresses in food packaging, food quality, and safety—controlled-release antioxidant and/or antimicrobial packaging. Molecules 26(5):1263. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26051263

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sahoo M, Vishwakarma S, Panigrahi C, Kumar J (2021) Nanotechnology: current applications and future scope in food. Food Front 2(1):3–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/fft2.58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Khedri S, Sadeghi E, Rouhi M, Delshadian Z, Mortazavian AM, de Toledo Guimarães J, Mohammadi R (2021) Bioactive edible films: development and characterization of gelatin edible films incorporated with casein phosphopeptides. LWT 138:110649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110649

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Balina K, Romagnoli F, Blumberga D (2017) Seaweed biorefinery concept for sustainable use of marine resources. Energy Procedia 128:504–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wu H, Zhang J, Yarish C, He P, Kim JK (2018) Bioremediation and nutrient migration during blooms of Ulva in the Yellow Sea, China. Phycologia 57(2):223–231. https://doi.org/10.2216/17-32.1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Son EB, Poo KM, Chang JS, Chae KJ (2018) Heavy metal removal from aqueous solutions using engineered magnetic biochars derived from waste marine macro-algal biomass. Sci Total Environ 615:161–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kiraci S (2018) Effects of seaweed and different farm manures on growth and yield of organic carrots. J Plant Nutr 41(6):716–721. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2018.1425435

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Piñeiro-Corbeira C, Barreiro R, Cremades J, Arenas F (2018) Seaweed assemblages under a climate change scenario: functional responses to temperature of eight intertidal seaweeds match recent abundance shifts. Sci Rep 8(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31357-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Mouritsen OG, Rhatigan P, Pérez-Lloréns JL (2019) The rise of seaweed gastronomy: phycogastronomy. Bot Mar 62(3):195–209. https://doi.org/10.1515/bot-2018-0041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cazón P, Velazquez G, Ramírez JA, Vázquez M (2017) Polysaccharide-based films and coatings for food packaging: a review. Food Hydrocoll 68:136–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.09.009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim JH, Kim YH, Kim SK, Kim BW, Nam SW (2011) Properties and industrial applications of seaweed polysaccharides-degrading enzymes from the marine microorganisms. Microbiol Biotechnol Lett 39(3):189–199

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Tang T, Cao S, Zhu B, Li Q (2021) Ulvan polysaccharide-degrading enzymes: an updated and comprehensive review of sources category, property, structure, and applications of ulvan lyases. Algal Res 60:102477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2021.102477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yosri N, Khalifa SA, Guo Z, Xu B, Zou X, El-Seedi HR (2021) Marine organisms: pioneer natural sources of polysaccharides/proteins for green synthesis of nanoparticles and their potential applications. Int J Biol Macromol 193:1767–1798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.10.229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Rahmati M, Alipanahi Z, Mozafari M (2019) Emerging biomedical applications of algal polysaccharides. Curr Pharm Des 25(11):1335–1344. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612825666190423160357

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Koyande AK, Chew KW, Manickam S, Chang JS, Show PL (2021) Emerging algal nanotechnology for high-value compounds: a direction to future food production. Trends Food Sci Technol 116:290–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.07.026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Luo Y, Wang Q, Zhang Y (2020) Biopolymer-based nanotechnology approaches to deliver bioactive compounds for food applications: a perspective on the past, present, and future. J Agri Food Chem 68(46):12993–13000. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.0c00277

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Dubashynskaya N, Poshina D, Raik S, Urtti A, Skorik YA (2020) Polysaccharides in ocular drug delivery. Pharmaceutics 12(1):22. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics12010022

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Bhowmicka B, Sarkara G, Ranab D, Roya I, Sahaa NR, Ghoshc S, Bhowmik M, Chattopadhyay D (2015) Effect of carrageenan and potassium chloride on an in situ gelling ophthalmic drug delivery system based on methylcellulose. RSC Adv 5(74):60386–60391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Cunha L, Grenha A (2016) Sulfated seaweed polysaccharides as multifunctional materials in drug delivery applications. Mar Drugs 14(3):42. https://doi.org/10.3390/md14030042

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Øverland M, Mydland LT, Skrede A (2019) Marine macroalgae as sources of protein and bioactive compounds in feed for monogastric animals. J Sci Food Agri 99(1):13–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.9143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Torres MD, Chenlo F, Moreira R (2018) Structural features and water sorption isotherms of carrageenans: a prediction model for hybrid carrageenans. Carbohydr Polym 180:72–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.10.010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Maciel DJ, de Mello Ferreira IL, da Costa GM, da Silva MR (2016) Nanocomposite hydrogels based on iota-carrageenan and maghemite: morphological, thermal and magnetic properties. Eur Polym J 76:147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.01.043

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Saluri M, Robal M, Tuvikene R (2019) Hybrid carrageenans as beer wort fining agents. Food Hydrocoll 86:26–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2017.12.020

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Beaumont M, Tran R, Vera G, Niedrist D, Rousset A, Pierre R, Shastri VP, Forget A (2021) Hydrogel-forming algae polysaccharides: from seaweed to biomedical applications. Biomacromolecules 22(3):1027–1052. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.0c01406

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Grenha A, Gomes ME, Rodrigues M, Santo VE, Mano JF, Neves NM, Reis RL (2010) Development of new chitosan/carrageenan nanoparticles for drug delivery applications. J Biomed Mater Res Part A 92(4):1265–1272. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32466

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Sharma G, Thakur B, Naushad M, Kumar A, Stadler FJ, Alfadul SM, Mola GT (2018) Applications of nanocomposite hydrogels for biomedical engineering and environmental protection. Environ Chem Lett 16(1):113–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-017-0671-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Abraham A, Afewerki B, Tsegay B, Ghebremedhin H, Teklehaimanot B, Reddy KS (2018) Extraction of agar and alginate from marine seaweeds in red sea region. Int J Mar Biol Res 3(2):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Onofre-Cordeiro NA, Silva YE, Solidônio EG, de Sena KX, Silva WE, Santos BS, Aquino KAS, Lima CSA, Yara R (2018) Agarose-silver particles films: effect of calcium ascorbate in nanoparticles synthesis and film properties. Int J Biol Macromol 119:701–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.07.115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Datta KKR, Srinivasan B, Balaram H, Eswaramoorthy M (2008) Synthesis of agarose-metal/semiconductor nanoparticles having superior bacteriocidal activity and their simple conversion to metal-carbon composites. J Chem Sci 120(6):579–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12039-008-0088-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Manivasagan P, Oh J (2016) Marine polysaccharide-based nanomaterials as a novel source of nanobiotechnological applications. Int J Biol Macromol 82:315–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.10.081

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Sun Y, Ma X, Hu H (2021) Marine polysaccharides as a versatile biomass for the construction of nano drug delivery systems. Mar Drugs 19(6):345. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19060345

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Wang D, Kim DH, Kim KH (2016) Effective production of fermentable sugars from brown macroalgae biomass. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100(22):9439–9450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7857-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Mustafa S, Mobashir M (2020) LC–MS and docking profiling reveals potential difference between the pure and crude fucoidan metabolites. Int J Biol Macromol 143:11–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.11.232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Jang B, Moorthy MS, Manivasagan P, Xu L, Song K, Lee KD, Kwak M, Oh J, Jin J-O (2018) Fucoidan-coated CuS nanoparticles for chemo-and photothermal therapy against cancer. Oncotarget 9(16):12649. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.23898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Lira MCB, Santos-Magalhães NS, Nicolas V, Marsaud V, Silva MPC, Ponchel G, Vauthier C (2011) Cytotoxicity and cellular uptake of newly synthesized fucoidan-coated nanoparticles. Eur J Pharma Biopharma 79(1):162–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2011.02.013

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Leung TCY, Wong CK, Xie Y (2010) Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles using biopolymers, carboxymethylated-curdlan and fucoidan. Mater Chem Phys 121(3):402–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2010.02.026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Rao SS, Saptami K, Venkatesan J, Rekha PD (2020) Microwave-assisted rapid synthesis of silver nanoparticles using fucoidan: Characterization with assessment of biocompatibility and antimicrobial activity. Int J Biol Macromol 163:745–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.06.230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Gupta D, Silva M, Radziun K, Martinez DC, Hill CJ, Marshall J, Hearnden V, Puertas-Mejia MA, Reilly GC (2020) Fucoidan inhibition of osteosarcoma cells is species and molecular weight dependent. Mar Drugs 18(2):104. https://doi.org/10.3390/md18020104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Oliveira C, Neves NM, Reis RL, Martins A, Silva TH (2020) A review on fucoidan antitumor strategies: from a biological active agent to a structural component of fucoidan-based systems. Carbohydr Polym 239:116131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116131

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Etman SM, Abdallah OY, Elnaggar YS (2020) Novel fucoidan based bioactive targeted nanoparticles from Undaria pinnatifida for treatment of pancreatic cancer. Int J Biol Macromol 145:390–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Lee KW, Jeong D, Na K (2013) Doxorubicin loading fucoidan acetate nanoparticles for immune and chemotherapy in cancer treatment. Carbohydr Polym 94(2):850–856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.02.018

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Yaich H, Garna H, Besbes S, Barthélemy JP, Paquot M, Blecker C, Attia H (2014) Impact of extraction procedures on the chemical, rheological and textural properties of ulvan from Ulva lactuca of Tunisia coast. Food Hydrocoll 40:53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.02.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Kidgell JT, Magnusson M, de Nys R, Glasson CR (2019) Ulvan: a systematic review of extraction, composition and function. Algal Res 39:101422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2019.101422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Weiner ML (2014) Food additive carrageenan: Part II: a critical review of carrageenan in vivo safety studies. Crit Rev Toxicol 44(3):244–269. https://doi.org/10.3109/10408444.2013.861798

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Weiner ML, McKim JM (2019) Comment on “Revisiting the carrageenan controversy: do we really understand the digestive fate and safety of carrageenan in our foods?” by S. David, CS Levi, L. Fahoum, Y. Ungar, EG Meyron-Holtz, A. Shpigelman and U. Lesmes. Food Funct 10(3):1760–1762. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8FO01282B

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. McKim JM, Willoughby JA Sr, Blakemore WR, Weiner ML (2019) Clarifying the confusion between poligeenan, degraded carrageenan, and carrageenan: a review of the chemistry, nomenclature, and in vivo toxicology by the oral route. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 59(19):3054–3073. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2018.1481822

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Frediansyah A (2021) The antiviral activity of iota-, kappa-, and lambda-carrageenan against COVID-19: a critical review. Clin Epidemiol Glob Health 12:100826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2021.100826

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Jiang JL, Zhang WZ, Ni WX, Shao JW (2021) Insight on structure-property relationships of carrageenan from marine red algal: a review. Carbohydr Polym 257:117642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.117642

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Lim YY, Lee WK, Lim PE, Phang SM, Leow ATC, Namasivayam P, Abdullah JO, Ho CL (2019) Expression analysis of potential transcript and protein markers that are related to agar yield and gel strength in Gracilaria changii (Rhodophyta). Algal Res 41:101532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2019.101532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Bui VT, Nguyen BT, Renou F, Nicolai T (2019) Structure and rheological properties of carrageenans extracted from different red algae species cultivated in Cam Ranh Bay, Vietnam. J Appl Phycol 31(3):1947–1953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-018-1665-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Massironi A, Morelli A, Grassi L, Puppi D, Braccini S, Maisetta G, Esin S, Batoni G, Pina CD, Chiellini F (2019) Ulvan as novel reducing and stabilizing agent from renewable algal biomass: application to green synthesis of silver nanoparticles. Carbohydr Polym 203:310–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.09.066

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Cassani L, Marcovich NE, Gomez-Zavaglia A (2021) Seaweed bioactive compounds: promising and safe inputs for the green synthesis of metal nanoparticles in the food industry. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2021.1965537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Wang Y, Xing M, Cao Q, Ji A, Liang H, Song S (2019) Biological activities of fucoidan and the factors mediating its therapeutic effects: a review of recent studies. Mar Drugs 17(3):183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Sanjeewa KK, Jeon YJ (2021) Fucoidans as scientifically and commercially important algal polysaccharides. Mar Drugs 19(6):284. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19060284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Mohammed ASA, Naveed M, Jost N (2021) Polysaccharides; classification, chemical properties, and future perspective applications in fields of pharmacology and biological medicine (a review of current applications and upcoming potentialities). J Polym Environ 29(8):2359–2371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-021-02052-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Bilal M, Gul I, Basharat A, Qamar SA (2021) Polysaccharides-based bio-nanostructures and their potential food applications. Int J Biol Macromol 176:540–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.02.107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. de Borba GD, Cinelli LP, Simas NK, Pessoa A Jr, Sette LD (2019) Marine prebiotics: polysaccharides and oligosaccharides obtained by using microbial enzymes. Food Chem 280:175–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.12.023

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Tanna B, Mishra A (2019) Nutraceutical potential of seaweed polysaccharides: structure, bioactivity, safety, and toxicity. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 18(3):817–831. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Wargacki AJ, Leonard E, Win MN, Regitsky DD, Santos CNS, Kim PB, Cooper SR, Raisner RM, Herman A, Sivitz AB, Lakshmanaswamy A, Kashiyama Y, Baker D, Yoshikuni Y (2012) An engineered microbial platform for direct biofuel production from brown macroalgae. Science 335(6066):308–313. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1214547

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Sun H, Gao L, Xue C, Mao X (2020) Marine-polysaccharide degrading enzymes: Status and prospects. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 19(6):2767–2796. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12630

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Reisky L, Préchoux A, Zühlke M-K, Bäumgen M, Robb CS, Gerlach N, Roret T, Stanetty C, Larocque R, Michel G, Song T, Markert S, Unfried F, Mihovilovic MD, Trautwein-Schult A, Becher D, Schweder T, Bornscheuer UT, Hehemann J-H (2019) A marine bacterial enzymatic cascade degrades the algal polysaccharide ulvan. Nat Chem Biol 15(8):803–812. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-019-0311-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Schultz-Johansen M, Bech PK, Hennessy RC, Glaring MA, Barbeyron T, Czjzek M, Stougaard P (2018) A novel enzyme portfolio for red algal polysaccharide degradation in the marine bacterium Paraglaciecola hydrolytica S66T encoded in a sizeable polysaccharide utilization locus. Front Microbiol 9:839. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.00839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Ghanbarzadeh M, Golmoradizadeh A, Homaei A (2018) Carrageenans and carrageenases: versatile polysaccharides and promising marine enzymes. Phytochem Rev 17(3):535–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11101-018-9548-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Ruocco N, Costantini S, Guariniello S, Costantini M (2016) Polysaccharides from the marine environment with pharmacological, cosmeceutical and nutraceutical potential. Molecules 21(5):551. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21050551

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Li JM, Nie SP (2016) The functional and nutritional aspects of hydrocolloids in foods. Food Hydrocoll 53:46–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2015.01.035

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. López-Franco YL, Higuera-Ciapara I, Lizardi-Mendoza J, Wang W, Goycoolea FM (2021) Other exudates: tragacanth, karaya, mesquite gum, and larchwood arabinogalactan. Handb Hydrocoll. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-820104-6.00003-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. George B, Suchithra TV (2019) Plant-derived bioadhesives for wound dressing and drug delivery system. Fitoterapia 137:104241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fitote.2019.104241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Jindal N, Khattar JS (2018) Microbial polysaccharides in food industry. In: Grumezescu AM, Holban AM (eds) Biopolymers for food design. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 95–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811449-0.00004-9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  91. Lee WK, Lim YY, Ho CL (2019) pH affects growth, physiology and agar properties of agarophyte Gracilaria changii (Rhodophyta) under low light intensity from Morib, Malaysia. Reg Stud Mar Sci 30:100738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2019.100738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Nadar SS, Vaidya L, Maurya S, Rathod VK (2019) Polysaccharide based metal organic frameworks (polysaccharide–MOF): a review. Coord Chem Rev 396:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2019.05.011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Khavari F, Saidijam M, Taheri M, Nouri F (2021) Microalgae: therapeutic potentials and applications. Mol Biol Rep 48(5):4757–4765. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-021-06422-w

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Rosales-Mendoza S, García-Silva I, González-Ortega O, Sandoval-Vargas JM, Malla A, Vimolmangkang S (2020) The potential of algal biotechnology to produce antiviral compounds and biopharmaceuticals. Molecules 25(18):4049. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25184049

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Trincone A (2018) Update on marine carbohydrate hydrolyzing enzymes: biotechnological applications. Molecules 23(4):901. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules23040901

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Essa HL, Abdelfattah MS, Marzouk AS, Guirguis HA, El-Sayed MM (2020) Nano-formulations of copper species coated with sulfated polysaccharide extracts and assessment of their phytotoxicity on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings in seed germination, foliar and soil applications. Appl Sci 10(18):6302. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10186302

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Ashraf SA, Siddiqui AJ, Elkhalifa AEO, Khan MI, Patel M, Alreshidi M, Moin A, Singh R, Snoussi M, Adnan M (2021) Innovations in nanoscience for the sustainable development of food and agriculture with implications on health and environment. SciTotal Environ 768:144990. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.144990

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Mei J, Ma X, Xie J (2019) Review on natural preservatives for extending fish shelf life. Foods 8(10):490. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8100490

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Sudhakar MP, Kumar BR, Mathimani T, Arunkumar K (2019) A review on bioenergy and bioactive compounds from microalgae and macroalgae-sustainable energy perspective. J Clean Prod 228:1320–1333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Freitas AC, Rodrigues D, Rocha-Santos TA, Gomes AM, Duarte AC (2012) Marine biotechnology advances towards applications in new functional foods. Biotechnol Adv 30(6):1506–1515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2012.03.006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Cherry P, O’Hara C, Magee PJ, McSorley EM, Allsopp PJ (2019) Risks and benefits of consuming edible seaweeds. Nutr Rev 77(5):307–329. https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuy066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Gul K, Singh AK, Jabeen R (2016) Nutraceuticals and functional foods: the foods for the future world. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 56(16):2617–2627. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2014.903384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Toskas G, Hund RD, Laourine E, Cherif C, Smyrniotopoulos V, Roussis V (2011) Nanofibers based on polysaccharides from the green seaweed Ulva rigida. Carbohydr Polym 84(3):1093–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.12.075

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Patel AK, Vadrale AP, Singhania RR, Michaud P, Pandey A, Chen SJ, Chen CW, Dong CD (2022) Algal polysaccharides: current status and future prospects. Phytochem Rev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11101-021-09799-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Ahmad K, Mahideen A, Nasir AK, Azeem S (2021) Quality deterioration of postharvest fruits and vegetables in developing country Pakistan: a mini overview. Asian J Agric Food Sci 9(2):2321–1571. https://doi.org/10.24203/ajafs.v9i2.6615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Sayed AHI, Elsherif DE, El-Shanshory AR, Haider AS, Gaafar RM (2021) Silver nanoparticles and Chlorella treatments induced glucosinolates and kaempferol key biosynthetic genes in Eruca sativa. Beni-Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci 10(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43088-021-00139-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Mathiot C, Ponge P, Gallard B, Sassi JF, Delrue F, Le Moigne N (2019) Microalgae starch-based bioplastics: screening of ten strains and plasticization of unfractionated microalgae by extrusion. Carbohydr Polym 208:142–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.12.057

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Dutta B, Bandopadhyay R (2022) Biotechnological potentials of halophilic microorganisms and their impact on mankind. Beni-Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci 11(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43088-022-00252-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Barsanti L, Gualtieri P (2018) Is exploitation of microalgae economically and energetically sustainable? Algal Res 31:107–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2018.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Colusse GA, Carneiro J, Duarte MER, Carvalho JCD, Noseda MD (2022) Advances in microalgal cell wall polysaccharides: a review focused on structure, production, and biological application. Crit Rev Biotechnol 42(4):562–577

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. Yasin MT, Ali Y, Ahmad K, Ghani A, Amanat K, Basheir MM, Faheem M, Hussain S, Ahmad B, Hussain A, Bokhari SAI (2021) Alkaline lipase production by novel meso-tolerant psychrophilic Exiguobacterium sp. strain (AMBL-20) isolated from glacier of northeastern Pakistan. Archives Microbiol 203(4):1309–1320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-020-02133-1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  112. Shah MM, Ahmad K, Ahmad B, Shah SM, Masood H, Siddique MAR, Ahmad R (2022) Recent trends in green synthesis of silver, gold, and zinc oxide nanoparticles and their application in nanosciences and toxicity: a review. Nanotechnol Environ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41204-022-00287-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Shahrajabian MH, Sun W, Cheng Q (2022) Foliar application of nutrients on medicinal and aromatic plants, the sustainable approaches for higher and better production. Beni-Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci 11(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43088-022-00210-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Qi H, Sheng J (2015) The antihyperlipidemic mechanism of high sulfate content ulvan in rats. Mar Drugs 13(6):3407–3421. https://doi.org/10.3390/md13063407

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Graiff A, Ruth W, Kragl U, Karsten U (2016) Chemical characterization and quantification of the brown algal storage compound laminarin—a new methodological approach. J Appl Phycol 28(1):533–543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-015-0563-z

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. Douglas KL, Tabrizian M (2005) Effect of experimental parameters on the formation of alginate–chitosan nanoparticles and evaluation of their potential application as DNA carrier. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 16(1):43–56. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568562052843339

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Sayed Ali Imran Bokhari, Assistance Professor in Biological Science Department (IIUI), Islamabad, Pakistan, for valuable comments on the manuscripts.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Food Sciences and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266003, Shandong Province, People’s Republic of China

    Khurshid Ahmad & Hajar Ifqir

  2. Department of Physics, NFC Institute of Engineering and Technology, Multan, 60000, Pakistan

    Suleman Khan

  3. Department of Biology, College of Science, United Arab Emirates University, 15551, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates

    Mahideen Afridi

  4. Department of Physics, Allama Iqbal Open University, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan

    Ather Hassan

  5. Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, University of Sialkot, Sialkot, 51040, Pakistan

    Muhammad Musaddiq Shah

  6. Department of Biological Sciences, International Islamic University, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan

    Khurshid Ahmad & Hassam Rasheed

  7. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology (UET), Peshawar, 25120, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

    Rasheed Ahmad

Authors
  1. Khurshid Ahmad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Suleman Khan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mahideen Afridi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ather Hassan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Muhammad Musaddiq Shah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hassam Rasheed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Rasheed Ahmad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hajar Ifqir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

KA contributed to methodology, validation, writing investigation, research investigation, and writing—review and editing. HR, KA, MA, RA, and HI contributed to conceptualization and writing—review and editing. SA, AH, and MMS contributed to supervision, conceptualization, resources, investigation, and writing—review and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Khurshid Ahmad.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interest

The authors declared no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmad, K., Khan, S., Afridi, M. et al. Marine macroalgae polysaccharides-based nanomaterials: an overview with respect to nanoscience applications. Beni-Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci 11, 156 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43088-022-00335-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43088-022-00335-8

Keywords

  • Macroalgae
  • Polysaccharides
  • Nanotechnology
  • Nanoparticles
  • Food industry