Skip to main content
Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences
Download PDF

Factorial design approach to fabricate and optimize floating tablets based on combination of natural polymer and rice bran wax

Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences volume 11, Article number: 5 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The aim of the present research work was to fabricate a novel gastroretentive drug delivery system in the form of tablets using a combination of natural polymer and rice bran wax with an intention to control drug delivery and to enhance the gastric residence time of the model drug Famotidine in the gastrointestinal tract.

Results

The results of the preliminary trial batches prepared by using the hot melt granulation technique resulting in six different formulations showed good physicochemical characteristics and tablets conformed to the Pharmacopoeial specifications. Gastroretentive tablets containing natural polymer showed prolonged drug release comparable to Methocel. The optimized formulation (C3) using 32 factorial design showed FLT 27 ± 2.47 s, SI 92.68 ± 1.36% and % CDR 98.89 ± 0.39% at 12 h. The stability studies indicated the stability of the formulation during storage.

Conclusions

It was concluded that the release profile fitted best to zero-order equation with non-Fickian diffusion mechanism of drug release which demonstrates swelling-controlled drug release mechanism. Thus, the formulated tablets have the potential for improved release and gastroretentive properties.

Graphical Abstract

1 Background

The oral route is the most versatile, convenient and normally employed route of drug delivery for systemic action [1]. Controlled release drug delivery by oral route is widely used because of its easy administration, patient suitability and formulation changeability [2]. To achieve the suitable therapeutic activity, frequent dosing of drugs is necessary. Several attempts are being made to reduce dosing frequency of a drug delivery system providing therapeutically effective plasma drug concentration for a longer period of time in a controlled and reproducible manner [2, 3]. In the upper gastrointestinal tract (GIT), for achieving, local or systemic effects, gastroretentive drug delivery system (GRDDS) can be used to prolong the residence time of the drug and also to target the site-specific drug release. Prolonged gastric retention by these systems may improve bioavailability and dissolution for drugs that are less soluble in a high pH environment, provided that the drug is stable in gastric environment [4, 5].

Drug absorption in the GIT depends upon the factors such as gastric emptying process, the gastrointestinal transit time of dosage forms, drug release from the dosage form and site of drug absorption [6]. A drug must be in a solubilized and stable form to successfully cross the biological barrier. As the drug travels through the GIT, its pH ranges from 1 to 8 [7].

Famotidine was used as a model drug which is a potent histamine H2-receptor antagonist. It is widely used in the treatment and prevention of gastric ulcers, duodenal ulcers, Zollinger–Ellison syndrome and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Poor absorption, less bioavailability and short half life of Famotidine after oral administration helped the development of a controlled release formulation [8, 9].

Natural gums are polysaccharides consisting of numerous sugar units such as glucose, galactose, rhamnose, arabinose, xylose, mannose and uronic acids. Due to their availability, safety and biodegradability, they are preferred over synthetic polymers. The majority of the gums are safe enough to be consumed and are hence, widely used in the field of drug delivery and as food additives [10].

Guar gum is obtained from the seeds of the plant Cyamopsis tetragonoloba, family: Leguminosae [11,12,13]. Guar gum hydrates readily in aqueous media to produce a viscous pseudoplastic solution that has greater low shear viscosity than the other hydrocolloids [14, 15].

The polymer and wax are commonly used as matrix-forming components. The use of wax seems to have a particular advantage due to chemical inertness against other materials, good stability varying at pH and moisture levels and well-established safe application in humans being [16].

The source of rice bran wax (RBW) is Oryza sativa belonging to family Graminae which is available plentifully. It is an important by-product of the rice bran oil industry. RBW is used as binding agent, plasticizer, coating and gelling agent. It is also used in cosmetics and in foods as a thickener [16, 17].

The objective of the present work was to formulate floating tablets for increased residence time in the stomach and also for controlling drug delivery using natural polymer (bioadhesive) and RBW (release retardant).

2 Methods

2.1 Materials

Famotidine as a gift sample was supplied by Cipla, Goa. Crude RBWwas obtained from Maheshwari Solvent Extraction Plant, Gondia, Maharashtra, India. Guar gum was purchased from Merck Specialities Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, and all other excipients used were of analytical grade.

2.2 Purification and characterization of RBW

RBW was purified and characterized for further use in the study [16,17,18,19].

2.3 Compatibility study

Mixtures consisting of different ratios of drug/RBW, drug/polymer and either drug or RBW/polymer alone were subjected to FTIR analysis using a model IR Affinity-1S FTIR spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Corporation Kyoto, Japan).

2.4 Formulation of gastroretentive tablets containing natural polymer, methocel K4M and RBW (preliminary trial batches)

For the formulation of gastroretentive tablets, the six different preliminary trial batches were prepared (Table 1) each containing Famotidine as a model drug (40 mg) and by varying the concentration of polymer (20 mg, 25 mg, 30 mg) and RBW (15 mg, 20 mg, 25 mg). Melt granulation technique was used for the preparation of gastroretentive tablets [20]. The tablets (250 mg) were prepared by direct compression method using flat-faced 6-mm punch (Rimek Mini Press-I machine).

Table 1 Preliminary trial batch composition containing HPMC K4 M and RBW, guar gum and RBW
Full size table

2.5 Evaluation of gastroretentive tablets containing natural polymer, methocel K4M and RBW (preliminary trial batches)

The prepared tablets were evaluated for precompression and post-compression parameters [21,22,23].

2.6 In vitro buoyancy

Floating lag time (FLT) and total floating time (TFT) were considered as in vitro buoyancy. The tablets were placed in a 100-ml beaker containing 0.1 N HCl, which was maintained at 37 °C. The time required for the tablet to rise to the surface of the medium was determined as the buoyancy lag time or FLT. The total buoyancy time or total floating time was considered as the time duration for which the dosage form remained floating on the surface of medium [24, 25].

2.7 Swelling index (%)

The tablets were weighed individually and placed separately in Petri dish containing 5 ml of 0.1 N HCl and incubated at 37 °C ± 10 °C. At regular 2-h time intervals until 12 h, the tablets were removed from Petri dish, and the excess surface liquid was removed carefully using the tissue paper. After draining free water by blotting with tissue paper, these were weighed for weight gain on the analytical balance [26, 27]. The following formula was used for calculating swelling index (SI):

Swelling Index = (weight of tablet at time-weight of tablet before immersion)/ (weight of tablet before immersion) × 100.

2.8 In vitro dissolution studies

The in vitro dissolution of all the batches were carried out in 0.1 N hydrochloric acid (HCl) as the dissolution medium using USP Type II Apparatus at 50 rpm and maintaining the temperature at 37 ± 0.5 °C. The dissolution was carried out for 12 h [28, 29].

2.9 Formulation of gastroretentive tablets containing natural polymer and RBW using 32 full factorial design

An optimization for the prepared buccoadhesive tablets were carried out using 32 (two-factor; three-level) experimental design. The concentrations of Guar gum (X1) and the concentrations of RBW (X2) were selected as independent variables (factors), which were varied at three levels (low, intermediate and high). Based on the preliminary trial batches, the levels of the three factors were chosen prior to the application of the factorial design. The FLT (Y1), SI (Y2) and % CDR (Y3) were selected as dependent variables (responses).

2.10 Evaluation of gastroretentive tablets containing natural polymer and RBW using 32 full factorial design

The prepared tablets were evaluated for precompression and post-compression parameters [21,22,23].

2.11 Optimization of formulation using 32 factorial design

For optimization, effects of various independent variables upon measured responses and their interactions created by 32 factorial design were represented using the following mathematical model equation:

$$Y = b_{0} + b_{1} X_{1} + b_{2} X_{2} + b_{12} X_{1} X_{2} + b_{11} X_{12} + b_{22} X_{22}$$
(1)

where Y is represented as dependent variable, arithmetic mean response of the nine runs is indicated by b0, and the estimated coefficient for the factor X1 is b1. The main effects (X1 and X2) are the average result of change of one factor at a time from its low to high value. Change in response with the change in factors simultaneously is given by interaction terms X1X2. The polynomial terms (X12 and X22) are included to investigate nonlinearity [30]. The significance of the model (P < 0.05) and individual response parameters were estimated employing one-way ANOVA.

2.12 Statistical analysis and mathematical model fitting

Statistical optimization was performed using Design-Expert 6.0.8 software (Stat-Ease Inc., USA). Rest of the data were analyzed using simple statistics.

The in vitro dissolution data were fitted to various mathematical models like zero-order, first-order, Higuchi, and Korsmeyer–Peppas models [31,32,33,34] for analyzing the mechanism of drug release from the tablets.

2.13 Selection of optimized formulation and validation of mathematical models

To validate the selected experimental design and polynomial equations, three optimum check points (formulation compositions) were chosen by intensive search performed over the entire experimental domain, and final formulation optimization was performed using a graphical optimization. The resultant experimental values were then quantitatively compared with predicted values. Formulation having maximum desirability value of % CDR, SI and FLT was found in the experimental region of the overlay plot which were selected as the optimized formulations.

2.14 Stability study

The stability studies were carried out following ICH guidelines. The optimized formulation was filled into the container and sealed packed. The studies were performed at 40 ± 2 °C and 75 ± 5% relative humidity (RH) in the desiccators with saturated salt solution for up to 6 months [35].

3 Results

3.1 Characterization of RBW

The wax was characterized for various properties as per Pharmacopoeial guidelines (Table 2).

Table 2 Characterization of RBW
Full size table

3.2 Compatibility study

Spectroscopic studies (FTIR) showed that there was no chemical interaction between the Famotidine (model drug) and the polymer as well as RBW (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Overlay spectrum of physical mixture of drug, polymer and gum

Full size image

3.3 Evaluation of gastroretentive tablets containing natural polymer, methocel K4M and RBW (preliminary trial batches)

All the tablets passed test for weight variation, hardness, content uniformity and showed acceptable results with respect to drug content (99.6 ± 0.7) and % friability (Tables 3, 4).

Table 3 Evaluation of pre compression parameters (HF1-HF3 and GF1-GF3)
Full size table
Table 4 Evaluation of post-compression parameters (HF1-HF3 and GF1-GF3)
Full size table

3.4 In vitro buoyancy

The results for in vitro buoyancy, i.e., FLT and TFT are shown in Table 5. FLT for all the tablets was found less than one minute, and for all the tablets, TFT was found more than 12 h.

Table 5 In vitro buoyancy study (HF1- HF3 and GF1- GF3) and SI
Full size table

3.5 Swelling index (SI)

The results of SI are shown in Table 5. A swelling study was performed on all the batches for 12 h. SI was found to be in the range of 65% to 95%.

3.6 In vitro dissolution studies

Cumulative percentage drug release (% CDR) of batches (HF1-HF3 and GF1-GF3) is shown in Fig. 2. Drug release for HF1 to GF3 was found 94.32% to 99.71% for 12 h.

Fig. 2
figure 2

% CDR of batches (HF1-HF3 and GF1-GF3)

Full size image

3.7 A 32 full factorial design of experiment for gastroretentive tablets containing natural polymer and RBW

In the present investigation, to study the effect of independent variables, i.e., the concentration of guar gum (X1), the concentration of RBW (X2) on dependent variables such as FLT, SI and % CDR, a 32 full factorial design was used based on the results of the preliminary trial batches.

All the dependent variables were found dependent on the selected independent variables as the wide variation was observed among the nine batches (F1 to F9). The high values of correlation coefficient (R2) for the dependent variables indicate a good fit. The experimental runs and their factor combinations are shown in Table 6.

Table 6 A 32 factorial design experimental layout
Full size table

3.8 Evaluation of gastroretentive tablets containing natural polymer and RBW using 32 full factorial design

Gastroretentive tablets were evaluated for pre- and post-compression parameters and results are shown in Tables 7 and 8. All the tablets passed test for weight variation, hardness, content uniformity and showed acceptable results with respect to drug content (99.87 ± 0.5) and % friability.

Table 7 Pre-compression parameters of batches (F1 to F9) using factorial design
Full size table
Table 8 Post-compression parameters of batches (F1 to F9) using factorial design
Full size table

3.9 Evaluation of gastroretentive tablets containing natural polymer and RBW using 32 full factorial design for FLT, SI and %CDR

The FLT, SI and % CDR of F1 to F9 along with the three extra check point formulations are shown in Table 9 and Figs. 3, 4 and 5.

Table 9 Factorial design and their observed response values in gastroretentive tablets
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure 3

FLT of gastroretentive formulations

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

SI of gastroretentive formulations

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

In vitro drug release profile of gastroretentive formulations along with extra check point formulations

Full size image

The total FLT of all the formulations was within the limits (less than three minutes). The SI of the formulations F1 to F9 and extra check point formulations C1–C3 was evaluated where the highest and lowest swelling was observed with the formulation F7 and F1 after 12 h. The drug release was found to be retarded for 12 h.

Formulations containing low level of polymer showed higher drug release (94.21 ± 0.57 to 98.28 ± 0.48%) than the formulations containing high level of polymer that showed drug release 87.59 ± 0.39 to 89.68 ± 0.26% at 12 h which may be due to increased viscosity offered by gelling of hydrophilic polymer.

3.10 Kinetic analysis of the drug release data

To analyze the mechanism of drug release from the tablets, the in vitro dissolution data (Fig. 5) were fitted to various mathematical models like zero-order, first-order, Higuchi, and Korsmeyer–Peppas models (Table 10).

Table 10 Model fitting of gastroretentive tablets (F1–F9)
Full size table

3.11 Statistical analysis and mathematical model fitting

As per the 32 factorial design, different trial formulations of gastroretentive tablets were prepared by melt granulation method. Overview of the experimental trial and observed responses is shown in Table 8. The models were found significant for all response parameters as indicated by ANOVA. Table 11 shows the F and P value for the responses using factorial design along with the percentage predicted errors for the trial formulations.

Table 11 Statistical analysis of generated models
Full size table

The effects of the independent variables (factors) on each investigated response are shown in Fig. 6 (a-f) as three-dimensional response surface plots and contour plots. The three-dimensional response surface plots relating FLT, SI and % CDR indicated the lessen values of FLT and % CDR and increased values of SI with the rise of guar gum and RBW.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Three-dimensional response surface plots (a–c) and contour plots (d–f) relating FLT, SI and % CDR

Full size image

From the predicted and experimental values (Table 12), it was observed that the lower magnitude of error as well as the significant value of R2 (0.9977) in the current study indicated a high prognostic ability of formulation with the use of response surface methodology.

Table 12 Check point formulations and % Error
Full size table

3.12 Stability studies

From the stability studies of the optimized gastroretentive tablet formulation (C3), it was observed that there was no considerable change in FLT, SI and % CDR which proved the stability of the formulation.

4 Discussion

It was concluded from the study that swelling increased with time as the polymer gradually absorbs water due to its hydrophilicity. The hydrophilic polymer in the outermost layer hydrates and swells to form a gel barrier.

FLT was found to increase with the increase in the concentration of polymer and RBW. The SI was found to increase with the increase in the concentration of polymer and also due to hydrophilic nature of the polymer. In all the formulations, good matrix integrity was observed.

It was observed that formulations containing high level of polymer and RBW exhibited delayed drug release indicating better matrix characteristics.

It was observed that the release profile fitted best to zero-order equation with non-Fickian diffusion mechanism of drug release which demonstrates swelling-controlled drug release mechanism.

Design Expert software gave suitable polynomial model equations involving individual main factors and interaction factors after fitting these data. The model equations relating FLT, SI and % CDR as responses by eliminating nonsignificant terms (P > 0.05) are

$$\begin{aligned} & {\text{FLT}} = + 8.75 - 0.25*A + 1.25*B + 2.25*A*B \\ & [R^{2} = 0.8657;F{\text{-value}} = 5.44;P < 0.05] \\ \end{aligned}$$
(2)
$$\begin{aligned} & {\text{SI}} = + 86.25 + 0.25*A - 2.25*B + 3.75*A*B \\ & [R^{2} = 0.903;F{\text{-value}} = 6.53;P < 0.05] \\ \end{aligned}$$
(3)
$$\begin{aligned} & \% {\text{CDR}} = 83.00 + 0.50*A - 3.00*B + 4.50*A*B \\ & [R^{2} = 0.892;F{\text{-value}} = 8.26;P < 0.05] \\ \end{aligned}$$
(4)

Each response coefficient was studied for its statistical significance and the relationship between the variables was further elucidated by using the response surface plot and contour plot. Ratio of 3.849 (FLT), 0.114 (SI) and 0.840 (% CDR) indicated an adequate signal. All the variables had P value less than 0.05 (P < 0.05) which is considered as significant.

Three formulations having maximum desirability value of FLT, % SI and % CDR were found in the experimental region of the overlay plot which were selected for the optimization of formulations. Based on maximum desirability values of FLT, SI and % CDR, formulation C3 was selected as final optimized formulation from the three formulations.

5 Conclusions

The present investigation aimed at formulation and evaluation of gastroretentive tablets based on combination of natural polymer and RBW containing Famotidine as a model drug. The results of compatibility study indicated the compatibility of selected excipients with the drug. All the tablets passed test for weight variation, hardness, content uniformity and showed acceptable results with respect to drug content (99.6 ± 0.7) and % friability in the preliminary trial batches using various polymers like hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose (HPMC), ethyl cellulose, guar gum and RBW. FLT for all the tablets was found less than one minute and for all the tablets TFT was found more than 12 h. It was concluded from the SI study that, swelling increased with time as the polymer gradually absorbs water due to its hydrophilicity. Drug release for HF1 to GF3 was found 94.32% to 99.71% for 12 h. In the present investigation, to study the effect of independent variables, i.e., the concentrations of guar gum (X1), the concentrations of RBW (X2) on dependent variables such as FLT, SI and % CDR, a 32 full factorial design was used based on the results of the preliminary trial batches.

The high values of correlation coefficient (R2) for the dependent variables indicate a good fit. All the tablets passed test for weight variation, hardness, content uniformity and showed acceptable results with respect to drug content (99.87 ± 0.5) and % friability. The total FLT of all the formulations was within the limits (less than three minutes). FLT was found to increase with the increase in the concentration of polymer and RBW. In all the formulations, good matrix integrity was observed and drug release was found retarded for 12 h. Formulations containing low level of polymer showed higher drug release (94.21 ± 0.57 to 98.28 ± 0.48%) than the formulations containing high level of polymer that showed drug release 87.59 ± 0.39 to 89.68 ± 0.26% at 12 h which may be due to increased viscosity offered by gelling of hydrophilic polymer. It was concluded that the release profile fitted best to zero-order equation with non-Fickian diffusion mechanism of drug release which demonstrates swelling-controlled drug release mechanism. The models were found significant for all response parameters as indicated by ANOVA. The three-dimensional response surface plots relating FLT, SI and % CDR indicated the decreased values of FLT and % CDR and increased values of SI with the increment in guar gum and RBW. Out of the three check point formulations, C3 was selected as final optimized formulation based on maximum desirability values of FLT, SI and % CDR. Stability studies proved the stability of the formulation. Thus, gastroretentive tablets were formulated successfully to control the drug delivery with the help of natural polymer and RBW.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the article.

Abbreviations

GIT:

Gastrointestinal tract

GRDDS:

Gastroretentive drug delivery system

RBW:

Rice bran wax

FLT:

Floating lag time

TFT:

Total floating time

SI:

Swelling index

%CDR:

Cumulative percentage drug release

h:

Hour

R2 :

Correlation coefficient

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

HPMC:

Hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose

References

  1. Patel SS, Ray S, Thakur RS (2006) Formulation and evaluation of floating drug delivery system containing clarithromycin for Helicobacter pylori. Acta Pol Pharm 63:53–61

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Homayun B, Lin X, Choi HJ (2019) Challenges and recent progress in oral drug delivery systems for biopharmaceuticals. Pharmaceutics 11(3):129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Streubel A, Siepmann J, Bodmeier R (2006) Gastroretentive drug delivery system. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 3(2):217–233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brahma NS, Kwon HK (2000) Floating drug delivery systems: an approach to oral controlled drug delivery via gastric retention. J Control Release 63:235–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Khar RK, Vyas SP (2012) Controlled drug delivery-concepts and advances. CBS Publishers and Distributors, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shakya R, Thapa P, Saha RN (2013) In vitro and in vivo evaluation of gastroretentive floating drug delivery system of ofloxacin. Asian J Pharm Sci 8(3):191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bardonnet PL, Faivre V, Pugh WJ, Piffaretti JC (2006) Gastroretentive dosage forms: overview and special case of Helicobacter pylori. J Control Release 111:1–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Echizen H, Ishizaki T (1991) Clinical pharmacokinetics of Famotidine. Clin Pharmacokinet 21(3):178–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jaimini M, Rana AC, Tanwar YS (2007) Formulation and evaluation of famotidine floating tablets. Curr Drug Deliv 4:51–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rana V, Rai P, Tiwary AK, Singh RS (2011) Modified gums: approaches and applications in drug delivery. Carbohydr Polym 83:1031–1047

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Whistler RL, Hymowitz T (1979) Guar: agronomy, production, industrial use, and nutrition. Purdue University Press, West Lafayette

    Google Scholar 

  12. Casas JA, Mohedano AF, Garcı´a-Ochoa F, (2000) Viscosity of guar gum and xanthan/guar gum mixture solutions. J Sci Food Agric 80(12):1722–1727

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mudgil D, Barak S, Khatkar BS (2014) Guar gum: processing, properties and food applications-a review. J Food Sci Technol 51:409–418

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cheetham NWH, Mashimba ENM (1990) Conformational aspects of xanthan-galactomannan gelation. Further evidence from optical-rotation studies. Carbohydr Polym 14:17–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Brosio E, Dubado A, Verzegnassi B (1994) Pulsed field gradient spin-echo NMR measurement of water diffusion coefficient in thickening and gelling agents: guar galactomannan solutions and pectin gels. Cell Mol Biol 40:569–573

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Houston DF (1972) Rice chemistry and technology, 2nd edn. AACC, St Paul

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gunawan S, Vali SR, Ju YS (2006) Purification and identification of rice bran oil fatty acid steryl and wax esters. J Am Oil Chem Soc 83(5):449–456

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sabale VP, Sabale PM, Lakhotiya CL (2007) In vitro studies on rice bran wax as skin moisturizer. Indian J Pharm Sci 69(2):215–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pharmacopoeia of India (1966) Govt. of India, New Delhi.

  20. Prajapati PH, Nakum VV, Patel CN (2012) Formulation and evaluation of floating matrix tablet of stavudine. Int J Pharm Investig 2(2):83–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. British Pharmacopoeia (2000) Vol.2, 3rd edn. Her majesty's stationary office for the department of health, London

  22. Charyulu NR, Patil AB, Lakshmi Deepika CH, Prabhu P, Shastry CS (2011) Development of gastro retentive floating matrix tablets of Diltiazem Hydrochloride. NUJHS 1:38–45

    Google Scholar 

  23. Skoog DA, Holler F (2007) Principles of instrumental analysis, 6th edn. Thomson Asia Pvt Limited, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  24. Khan F, Shaikhul MIB, Khan ZR, Azam KR, Sadat SMA, Reza MS (2008) Preparation and in vitro evaluation of theophyline loaded gastroretentive floating tablets of Methocel K4M. Dhaka Univ J Pharm Sci 7(1):65–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Gharti KP, Thapa P, Budhathoki U, Bhargava A (2012) Formulation and in vitro evaluation of floating tablets of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and polyethylene oxide using ranitidine hydrochloride as a model drug. J Young Pharm 4(4):201–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Havaldar VD, Kulkarni AS, Dias RJ, Aloorkar NH, Mali KK (2009) Floating matrix tablets of atenolol: formulation and in vitro evaluation. Asian J Pharm 3(4):286–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pawar HA, Gharat PR, Dhavale RV, Joshi PR, Rakshit PP (2013) Development and evaluation of gastroretentive floating tablets of an antihypertensive drug using hydrogenated cottonseed oil. ISRN Pharm 2013:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  28. Nemade MS, Thorat SS, Chaudhari RY, Pati VR (2014) Formulation development of controlled release drug delivery system for tegaserod maleate. Res J Pharm and Tech 7(9):1046–1051

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mulye NV, Turco SJ (1996) An examination of assumptions underlying the first-order kinetic model for release of water soluble drugs from dicalcium phosphate dihydrate matrices. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 22(7):673–679

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Singh B, Kapil R, Nandi M, Ahuja N (2011) Developing oral drug delivery systems using formulation by design: vital precepts, retrospect and prospects. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 8(10):1341–1360

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Varelas CG, Dixon DG, Steiner CA (1995) Zero-order release from biphasic polymer hydrogels. J Control Release 34(3):185–192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Fu Y, Kao WJ (2010) Drug release kinetics and transport mechanisms of nondegradable and degradable polymeric delivery systems. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 7(4):429–444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Higuchi T (1961) Rate of release of medicaments from ointment bases containing drugs in suspension. J Pharm Sci 50:874–875

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Korsmeyer RW, Gurny R, Doelker E, Buri P, Peppas NA (1983) Mechanisms of solute release from porous hydrophilic polymers. Int J Pharm 15(1):25–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. ICH: Q1A (R2): Stability testing of new drug substances and drug products https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/ich-q-1-r2-stability-testing-new-drug-substances-products-step-5_en.pdf. Accessed 26 April 2018

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express their gratitude to the Principal and President of Dadasaheb Balpande College of Pharmacy, Besa for providing the facilities to carry out the research work.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dadasaheb Balpande College of Pharmacy, Besa, Nagpur, Maharashtra, 440037, India

    Vidya P. Sabale & Gunjan G. Gadge

Authors
  1. Vidya P. Sabale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gunjan G. Gadge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

VPS involved in conceptualization, supervision and writing–original draft preparation. GGG involved in methodology, investigation and analysis. All authors read and approved final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vidya P. Sabale.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sabale, V.P., Gadge, G.G. Factorial design approach to fabricate and optimize floating tablets based on combination of natural polymer and rice bran wax. Beni-Suef Univ J Basic Appl Sci 11, 5 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43088-021-00186-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43088-021-00186-9

Keywords